基于agent的学徒制仿真比较研究

A. Sedigh, M. Purvis, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Christopher K. Frantz, Maryam A. Purvis
{"title":"基于agent的学徒制仿真比较研究","authors":"A. Sedigh, M. Purvis, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Christopher K. Frantz, Maryam A. Purvis","doi":"10.18564/jasss.4733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In this paper, we investigate the effects of different characteristics of apprenticeship programmes both in historical and contemporary societies. Apprenticeship is one of the major means to transfer skills in a society. Weconsiderfivesocieties: theoldBritainsystem(AD 1300 s − 1600 s ), theBritishEastIndiaCompany(AD 1600 s − 1800 s ), Armenian merchants of New-Julfa (AD 1600 s − 1700 s ), contemporary German apprenticeship ( 1990 s ), and the “ Modern Apprenticeship ” in Britain ( 2001 ). In comparing these systems, using an agent-based simulationmodel,weidentifiedsixcharacteristicswhichimpactthesuccessofanapprenticeshipprogrammeinasociety,whichwemeasuredbyconsideringthreeparameters,namelythenumberofskilledagentsproducedbytheapprenticeships,programmecompletion,andthecontributionofprogrammestotheGrossDomesticIncome(GDI)ofthesociety.Weinvestigatedifferentdefinitionsforsuccessofanapprenticeshipandsomehy-potheticalsocietiestotestsomecommonbeliefsaboutapprenticeships’performance.Thesimulationssuggestthata)itisbettertoinvestinapubliceducationalsystemratherthansubsidisingprivatecontractorstotrainapprentices,b)havingahighercompletionratioforapprenticeshipprogrammedoesnotnecessarilyresultinahighercontributionintheGDI,andc)governors(e.g.mayorsorgovernment)thatfacesignificantemigrationshouldalsoconsideremployingpoliciesthatpersuadeapprenticestocompletetheirprogrammeandstayinthesocietyaftercompletiontoimproveapprenticeshipefficacy.","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Apprenticeship Systems Using Agent-Based Simulation\",\"authors\":\"A. Sedigh, M. Purvis, Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu, Christopher K. Frantz, Maryam A. Purvis\",\"doi\":\"10.18564/jasss.4733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In this paper, we investigate the effects of different characteristics of apprenticeship programmes both in historical and contemporary societies. Apprenticeship is one of the major means to transfer skills in a society. Weconsiderfivesocieties: theoldBritainsystem(AD 1300 s − 1600 s ), theBritishEastIndiaCompany(AD 1600 s − 1800 s ), Armenian merchants of New-Julfa (AD 1600 s − 1700 s ), contemporary German apprenticeship ( 1990 s ), and the “ Modern Apprenticeship ” in Britain ( 2001 ). In comparing these systems, using an agent-based simulationmodel,weidentifiedsixcharacteristicswhichimpactthesuccessofanapprenticeshipprogrammeinasociety,whichwemeasuredbyconsideringthreeparameters,namelythenumberofskilledagentsproducedbytheapprenticeships,programmecompletion,andthecontributionofprogrammestotheGrossDomesticIncome(GDI)ofthesociety.Weinvestigatedifferentdefinitionsforsuccessofanapprenticeshipandsomehy-potheticalsocietiestotestsomecommonbeliefsaboutapprenticeships’performance.Thesimulationssuggestthata)itisbettertoinvestinapubliceducationalsystemratherthansubsidisingprivatecontractorstotrainapprentices,b)havingahighercompletionratioforapprenticeshipprogrammedoesnotnecessarilyresultinahighercontributionintheGDI,andc)governors(e.g.mayorsorgovernment)thatfacesignificantemigrationshouldalsoconsideremployingpoliciesthatpersuadeapprenticestocompletetheirprogrammeandstayinthesocietyaftercompletiontoimproveapprenticeshipefficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们调查了不同特征的学徒计划在历史和当代社会的影响。学徒制是社会中技能转移的主要手段之一。我们考虑了五个社会:旧英国制度(公元1300 - 1600年),英国的印度公司(公元1600 - 1800年),新尤法的亚美尼亚商人(公元1600 - 1700年),当代德国学徒制(1990年),以及英国的“现代学徒制”(2001年)。在比较这些系统时,使用基于代理的simulationmodel、weidentifiedsixcharacteristicswhichimpactthesuccessofanapprenticeshipprogrammeinasociety whichwemeasuredbyconsideringthreeparameters、namelythenumberofskilledagentsproducedbytheapprenticeships programmecompletion, andthecontributionofprogrammestotheGrossDomesticIncome (GDI) ofthesociety.Weinvestigatedifferentdefinitionsforsuccessofanapprenticeshipandsomehy-potheticalsocietiestotestsomecommonbeliefsaboutapprenticeships itisbettertoinvestinapublic 'performance.Thesimulationssuggestthata)educationalsystemratherthansubsidisingprivatecontractorstotrainapprentices, b) havingahighercompletionratioforapprenticeshipprogrammedoesnotnecessarilyresultinahighercontributionintheGDI,并且)州长(e.g.mayorsorgovernment) thatfacesignificantemigrationshouldalsoconsideremployingpoliciesthatpersuadeapprenticestocompletetheirprogrammeandstayinthesocietyaftercompletiontoimproveapprenticeshipefficacy着。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study on Apprenticeship Systems Using Agent-Based Simulation
: In this paper, we investigate the effects of different characteristics of apprenticeship programmes both in historical and contemporary societies. Apprenticeship is one of the major means to transfer skills in a society. Weconsiderfivesocieties: theoldBritainsystem(AD 1300 s − 1600 s ), theBritishEastIndiaCompany(AD 1600 s − 1800 s ), Armenian merchants of New-Julfa (AD 1600 s − 1700 s ), contemporary German apprenticeship ( 1990 s ), and the “ Modern Apprenticeship ” in Britain ( 2001 ). In comparing these systems, using an agent-based simulationmodel,weidentifiedsixcharacteristicswhichimpactthesuccessofanapprenticeshipprogrammeinasociety,whichwemeasuredbyconsideringthreeparameters,namelythenumberofskilledagentsproducedbytheapprenticeships,programmecompletion,andthecontributionofprogrammestotheGrossDomesticIncome(GDI)ofthesociety.Weinvestigatedifferentdefinitionsforsuccessofanapprenticeshipandsomehy-potheticalsocietiestotestsomecommonbeliefsaboutapprenticeships’performance.Thesimulationssuggestthata)itisbettertoinvestinapubliceducationalsystemratherthansubsidisingprivatecontractorstotrainapprentices,b)havingahighercompletionratioforapprenticeshipprogrammedoesnotnecessarilyresultinahighercontributionintheGDI,andc)governors(e.g.mayorsorgovernment)thatfacesignificantemigrationshouldalsoconsideremployingpoliciesthatpersuadeapprenticestocompletetheirprogrammeandstayinthesocietyaftercompletiontoimproveapprenticeshipefficacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conflicting Information and Compliance with COVID-19 Behavioral Recommendations Particle Swarm Optimization for Calibration in Spatially Explicit Agent-Based Modeling The Role of Reinforcement Learning in the Emergence of Conventions: Simulation Experiments with the Repeated Volunteer's Dilemma Generation of Synthetic Populations in Social Simulations: A Review of Methods and Practices An Integrated Ecological-Social Simulation Model of Farmer Decisions and Cropping System Performance in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1