学生在小组讨论活动中询问三角比的能力

Umi Faizah, Subanji Subanji, Susiswo Susiswo
{"title":"学生在小组讨论活动中询问三角比的能力","authors":"Umi Faizah, Subanji Subanji, Susiswo Susiswo","doi":"10.25273/JIPM.V9I2.8064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Small group discussions (group work) are an important part of the learning process though students are rarely skilled at asking a question. The purpose of this study is to examine student interactions and questioning skills during group work. This research study uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The research subjects consist of eight students who were divided heterogeneously into two groups, with four members for each group. The research instrument consists of the researcher herself, a task in the form of a trigonometric ratio group worksheet, and three video cameras to observe discussion activities. One camera was focused on all class activities and two cameras were pointing at each group being observed. All conversation transcripts during the discussion are deciphered, coded, and then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study show the interaction of conveying opinion/rebuttals, asking questions, and providing answers, with the percentage of giving opinions/ objections were more dominant than other interactions. The ability to ask questions was obtained by 50% of the students having the medium questioning ability and 50% having the low questioning ability, with the level of questions asked at the LOTS level, namely C1 and C3 levels. None of the students had high questioning skills. Of the two groups observed, group A was more active in interacting both in terms of exchanging opinions/rebuttals, asking questions, and providing answers. Suggestions for further research need to be carried out an in-depth analysis of discussion activities both in terms of asking questions or providing feedback to see the emergence of collaborative reasoning.","PeriodicalId":31874,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kemampuan Bertanya Siswa dalam Kegiatan Diskusi Kelompok pada Materi Rasio Trigonometri\",\"authors\":\"Umi Faizah, Subanji Subanji, Susiswo Susiswo\",\"doi\":\"10.25273/JIPM.V9I2.8064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Small group discussions (group work) are an important part of the learning process though students are rarely skilled at asking a question. The purpose of this study is to examine student interactions and questioning skills during group work. This research study uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The research subjects consist of eight students who were divided heterogeneously into two groups, with four members for each group. The research instrument consists of the researcher herself, a task in the form of a trigonometric ratio group worksheet, and three video cameras to observe discussion activities. One camera was focused on all class activities and two cameras were pointing at each group being observed. All conversation transcripts during the discussion are deciphered, coded, and then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study show the interaction of conveying opinion/rebuttals, asking questions, and providing answers, with the percentage of giving opinions/ objections were more dominant than other interactions. The ability to ask questions was obtained by 50% of the students having the medium questioning ability and 50% having the low questioning ability, with the level of questions asked at the LOTS level, namely C1 and C3 levels. None of the students had high questioning skills. Of the two groups observed, group A was more active in interacting both in terms of exchanging opinions/rebuttals, asking questions, and providing answers. Suggestions for further research need to be carried out an in-depth analysis of discussion activities both in terms of asking questions or providing feedback to see the emergence of collaborative reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25273/JIPM.V9I2.8064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25273/JIPM.V9I2.8064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小组讨论(小组工作)是学习过程的重要组成部分,尽管学生很少善于提问。本研究的目的是考察学生在小组作业中的互动和提问技巧。本研究采用定性描述方法。研究对象包括8名学生,他们被分成两组,每组4人。研究工具包括研究人员本人,三角比小组工作表形式的任务,以及三个摄像机,以观察讨论活动。一个摄像头对准所有的课堂活动,两个摄像头对准每个被观察的小组。讨论过程中的所有谈话记录都被破译、编码,然后进行定性分析。本研究结果显示,在表达意见/反驳、提问和提供答案的互动中,给出意见/反对的比例比其他互动更占主导地位。50%的中等提问能力学生获得提问能力,50%的低提问能力学生获得提问能力,提问水平为LOTS水平,即C1和C3水平。没有一个学生有很高的提问技巧。在观察到的两组中,A组在交换意见/反驳、提问和提供答案方面的互动更为活跃。对于进一步的研究建议,需要对讨论活动进行深入的分析,无论是从提问还是提供反馈的角度来看,协作推理的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kemampuan Bertanya Siswa dalam Kegiatan Diskusi Kelompok pada Materi Rasio Trigonometri
Small group discussions (group work) are an important part of the learning process though students are rarely skilled at asking a question. The purpose of this study is to examine student interactions and questioning skills during group work. This research study uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The research subjects consist of eight students who were divided heterogeneously into two groups, with four members for each group. The research instrument consists of the researcher herself, a task in the form of a trigonometric ratio group worksheet, and three video cameras to observe discussion activities. One camera was focused on all class activities and two cameras were pointing at each group being observed. All conversation transcripts during the discussion are deciphered, coded, and then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study show the interaction of conveying opinion/rebuttals, asking questions, and providing answers, with the percentage of giving opinions/ objections were more dominant than other interactions. The ability to ask questions was obtained by 50% of the students having the medium questioning ability and 50% having the low questioning ability, with the level of questions asked at the LOTS level, namely C1 and C3 levels. None of the students had high questioning skills. Of the two groups observed, group A was more active in interacting both in terms of exchanging opinions/rebuttals, asking questions, and providing answers. Suggestions for further research need to be carried out an in-depth analysis of discussion activities both in terms of asking questions or providing feedback to see the emergence of collaborative reasoning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Matematika Materi Statistika Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Analisis Kemampuan Penyelesaian Masalah Matematika di Masa Pandemi Ditinjau dari Self Regulation dan Gaya Kognitif Konseptual Tempo Pengaruh STEM-PjBL terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa MTS Learning Obstacle Materi Pengukuran Sudut Siswa Kelas IV di SD Negeri 32 Palembang Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Flipbook Matematika Materi Bangun Datar Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1