孢子菌属的体外抗真菌敏感性及其与孢子菌病治疗方案的相关性:系统综述

A. Koehler, D. M. Pagani, A. H. da Silva Hellwig, M. L. Scroferneker
{"title":"孢子菌属的体外抗真菌敏感性及其与孢子菌病治疗方案的相关性:系统综述","authors":"A. Koehler, D. M. Pagani, A. H. da Silva Hellwig, M. L. Scroferneker","doi":"10.1097/MRM.0000000000000291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Sporotrichosis is an infection with global distribution caused by the dimorphic fungi of the genus Sporothrix, whose main pathogenic species include Sporothrix schenckii, Sporothrix brasiliensis, Sporothrix globosa, and Sporothrix luriei. Itraconazole and amphotericin B are the most used antifungals for the treatment. The aim of this review was to compile the in-vitro susceptibility data of Sporothrix spp. found in literature and correlate this data with the treatment guidelines for sporotrichosis. The systematic review was performed according to the Cochrane methodology and with PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparators, Outcomes, Study Design) strategy. Thirty-six studies were included that used the filamentous and/or the yeast phases to perform the susceptibility tests. Three studies that evaluated the association of antifungals using the checkerboard method were also included. The data found were, whenever possible, compared with the defined Epidemiological Cutoff Values (ECVs). Analyzing only the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, the most effective antifungal in vitro was terbinafine. However, this is not the same result as observed in vivo. Both itraconazole and amphotericin B presented in-vitro activity. However, many studies have shown that isolates can acquire resistance mechanisms to these antifungals (MIC > ECV), which deserves attention. Further studies are needed to translate in-vitro susceptibility data into clinical practice, and also to determine ECVs for more antifungals and Sporothrix species.","PeriodicalId":49625,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Medical Microbiology","volume":"576 1","pages":"219 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-vitro antifungal susceptibility of the genus Sporothrix and correlation with treatment options for sporotrichosis: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"A. Koehler, D. M. Pagani, A. H. da Silva Hellwig, M. L. Scroferneker\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MRM.0000000000000291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Sporotrichosis is an infection with global distribution caused by the dimorphic fungi of the genus Sporothrix, whose main pathogenic species include Sporothrix schenckii, Sporothrix brasiliensis, Sporothrix globosa, and Sporothrix luriei. Itraconazole and amphotericin B are the most used antifungals for the treatment. The aim of this review was to compile the in-vitro susceptibility data of Sporothrix spp. found in literature and correlate this data with the treatment guidelines for sporotrichosis. The systematic review was performed according to the Cochrane methodology and with PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparators, Outcomes, Study Design) strategy. Thirty-six studies were included that used the filamentous and/or the yeast phases to perform the susceptibility tests. Three studies that evaluated the association of antifungals using the checkerboard method were also included. The data found were, whenever possible, compared with the defined Epidemiological Cutoff Values (ECVs). Analyzing only the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, the most effective antifungal in vitro was terbinafine. However, this is not the same result as observed in vivo. Both itraconazole and amphotericin B presented in-vitro activity. However, many studies have shown that isolates can acquire resistance mechanisms to these antifungals (MIC > ECV), which deserves attention. Further studies are needed to translate in-vitro susceptibility data into clinical practice, and also to determine ECVs for more antifungals and Sporothrix species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Medical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"576 1\",\"pages\":\"219 - 227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Medical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRM.0000000000000291\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRM.0000000000000291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

孢子丝菌病是由孢子丝菌属的二态真菌引起的一种全球分布的感染,其主要致病物种包括申克孢子丝菌、巴西孢子丝菌、全球孢子丝菌和luriei孢子丝菌。伊曲康唑和两性霉素B是治疗中最常用的抗真菌药物。本综述的目的是汇编文献中发现的孢子丝菌的体外敏感性数据,并将这些数据与孢子丝菌病的治疗指南相关联。根据Cochrane方法学和PICOS(参与者、干预、比较者、结果、研究设计)策略进行系统评价。36项研究采用丝状和/或酵母相进行药敏试验。还包括三项使用棋盘法评估抗真菌药物相关性的研究。如果可能,将发现的数据与定义的流行病学临界值(ecv)进行比较。仅对最小抑菌浓度(MIC)值进行分析,特比萘芬的体外抑菌效果最好。然而,这与在体内观察到的结果不同。伊曲康唑和两性霉素B均有体外活性。然而,许多研究表明,分离株可以获得对这些抗真菌药物的耐药机制(MIC > ECV),这值得关注。需要进一步的研究将体外敏感性数据转化为临床实践,并确定更多抗真菌和孢子菌种类的ecv。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-vitro antifungal susceptibility of the genus Sporothrix and correlation with treatment options for sporotrichosis: a systematic review
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Sporotrichosis is an infection with global distribution caused by the dimorphic fungi of the genus Sporothrix, whose main pathogenic species include Sporothrix schenckii, Sporothrix brasiliensis, Sporothrix globosa, and Sporothrix luriei. Itraconazole and amphotericin B are the most used antifungals for the treatment. The aim of this review was to compile the in-vitro susceptibility data of Sporothrix spp. found in literature and correlate this data with the treatment guidelines for sporotrichosis. The systematic review was performed according to the Cochrane methodology and with PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparators, Outcomes, Study Design) strategy. Thirty-six studies were included that used the filamentous and/or the yeast phases to perform the susceptibility tests. Three studies that evaluated the association of antifungals using the checkerboard method were also included. The data found were, whenever possible, compared with the defined Epidemiological Cutoff Values (ECVs). Analyzing only the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, the most effective antifungal in vitro was terbinafine. However, this is not the same result as observed in vivo. Both itraconazole and amphotericin B presented in-vitro activity. However, many studies have shown that isolates can acquire resistance mechanisms to these antifungals (MIC > ECV), which deserves attention. Further studies are needed to translate in-vitro susceptibility data into clinical practice, and also to determine ECVs for more antifungals and Sporothrix species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in Medical Microbiology
Reviews in Medical Microbiology 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Medical Microbiology is a quarterly review journal which provides a balanced coverage of the whole field of medical microbiology. The Journal publishes state-of-the art reviews, mini-reviews, case presentations and original research from on-going research of the latest developments and techniques in medical microbiology, virology, mycology, parasitology, clinical microbiology, and hospital infection.​ In addition, PhD-Review - a platform for young researchers, and biographical Bio-Sketch articles are also considered. Reviews are concise, authoritative, and readable synthesis of the latest information on its subject, and references are limited to the fifty key sources for full reviews and twenty for mini-reviews. Reviews in Medical Microbiology is the perfect way for both qualified and trainee microbiologists, and researchers and clinicians with an interest in microbiology, to stay fully informed of the latest developments in medical microbiology. The journal is a valuable resource for educational and teaching purposes.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of the immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 Reviews in Medical Microbiology become Reviews and Research in Medical Microbiology A review on antiviral efficacy of Bifidobacterium species Multifunctional dynamic toolbox A case of primary extragenital cutaneous gonorrhea involving the finger
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1