微创主动脉瓣置换术中经皮肺动脉通气和冠状窦停搏的可靠性:单中心经验

C. Labriola, D. Paparella, G. Labriola, Pierpaolo Dambruoso, M. Cassese, G. Speziale
{"title":"微创主动脉瓣置换术中经皮肺动脉通气和冠状窦停搏的可靠性:单中心经验","authors":"C. Labriola, D. Paparella, G. Labriola, Pierpaolo Dambruoso, M. Cassese, G. Speziale","doi":"10.1097/SA.0000000000000328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A lthough percutaneous pulmonary vent and coronary sinus (CS) cardioplegia have been identified as a fundamental skill to provide a safe surgical environment for patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement (MIAVR), data on the feasibility and results of these have not yet been reported. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the reliability and efficacy of ProPlege and EndoVent catheters, commonly referred to as “necklines,” for intraoperative CS cardioplegia and pulmonary artery venting in the setting of MIAVR. The study evaluated the records of 51patients who underwent MIAVR either through upper hemisternotomy or right anterior thoracotomy. The ProPlege device was placed into the CS under transesophageal echocardiography and pressure guidance, and the EndoVent device was placed using pressure-curve monitoring by the anesthesiologist prior to the surgical procedure. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement was performed through a J-shaped upper hemisternotomy in 38 patients and a right anterior thoracotomy in 13 patients. Line performance, time needed for placement, rate of successful placement, and major perioperative complications were recorded and reviewed. Necklines were placed successfully in all patients, and the mean time for the placement was 14 ± 9 minutes for ProPlege and 9 ± 4 minutes for EndoVent. A total of 110 doses of retrograde cardioplegiawere delivered through the ProPlege device at a mean flow rate of 173±35mL/min and amean pressure of 41±6mmHg. Venting of the heart by the pulmonary catheter grading was “excellent” in 33 patients, “sufficient” in 12 patients, and “not adequate” in 2 patients. Thesewere surgeon-reported scores based on satisfaction in the degree of freedom from blood in the field. Results showed no deaths or complications, including perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative re-exploration for bleeding, stroke, kidney failure, or low-output syndrome. In conclusion, ProPlege devices and EndoVent catheters were found to be reliable and ensured effective CS cardioplegia and pulmonary artery venting in the setting of MIAVR. The necklines provided adequate myocardial protection, acceptable grade of venting of the heart, and unobstructed vision and access during MIAVR procedures. Further research is required to demonstrate the advantages of necklines over conventional techniques.","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Percutaneous Pulmonary Vent and Coronary Sinus Cardioplegia in the Setting of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Experience\",\"authors\":\"C. Labriola, D. Paparella, G. Labriola, Pierpaolo Dambruoso, M. Cassese, G. Speziale\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SA.0000000000000328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A lthough percutaneous pulmonary vent and coronary sinus (CS) cardioplegia have been identified as a fundamental skill to provide a safe surgical environment for patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement (MIAVR), data on the feasibility and results of these have not yet been reported. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the reliability and efficacy of ProPlege and EndoVent catheters, commonly referred to as “necklines,” for intraoperative CS cardioplegia and pulmonary artery venting in the setting of MIAVR. The study evaluated the records of 51patients who underwent MIAVR either through upper hemisternotomy or right anterior thoracotomy. The ProPlege device was placed into the CS under transesophageal echocardiography and pressure guidance, and the EndoVent device was placed using pressure-curve monitoring by the anesthesiologist prior to the surgical procedure. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement was performed through a J-shaped upper hemisternotomy in 38 patients and a right anterior thoracotomy in 13 patients. Line performance, time needed for placement, rate of successful placement, and major perioperative complications were recorded and reviewed. Necklines were placed successfully in all patients, and the mean time for the placement was 14 ± 9 minutes for ProPlege and 9 ± 4 minutes for EndoVent. A total of 110 doses of retrograde cardioplegiawere delivered through the ProPlege device at a mean flow rate of 173±35mL/min and amean pressure of 41±6mmHg. Venting of the heart by the pulmonary catheter grading was “excellent” in 33 patients, “sufficient” in 12 patients, and “not adequate” in 2 patients. Thesewere surgeon-reported scores based on satisfaction in the degree of freedom from blood in the field. Results showed no deaths or complications, including perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative re-exploration for bleeding, stroke, kidney failure, or low-output syndrome. In conclusion, ProPlege devices and EndoVent catheters were found to be reliable and ensured effective CS cardioplegia and pulmonary artery venting in the setting of MIAVR. The necklines provided adequate myocardial protection, acceptable grade of venting of the heart, and unobstructed vision and access during MIAVR procedures. Further research is required to demonstrate the advantages of necklines over conventional techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SA.0000000000000328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SA.0000000000000328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然经皮肺通气道和冠状动脉窦(CS)心脏截截术已被确定为微创心脏手术主动脉瓣置换术(MIAVR)患者提供安全手术环境的基本技能,但其可行性和结果的数据尚未报道。本回顾性分析的目的是评估ProPlege和EndoVent导管(通常称为“领口”)在MIAVR情况下用于术中CS心脏骤停和肺动脉通气的可靠性和有效性。本研究评估了51例通过上半截骨或右前开胸行MIAVR的患者的记录。ProPlege装置在经食管超声心动图和压力引导下放置于CS中,EndoVent装置在手术前由麻醉师在压力曲线监测下放置。微创心脏手术行主动脉瓣置换术,其中38例为j型上半叶切开术,13例为右前胸切开术。记录并回顾线性能、放置所需时间、放置成功率和主要围手术期并发症。所有患者领口均放置成功,ProPlege组平均放置时间为14±9分钟,EndoVent组平均放置时间为9±4分钟。ProPlege装置共给药110剂,平均流速为173±35mL/min,平均压力为41±6mmHg。33例肺导管心脏通气评分为“优秀”,12例为“充分”,2例为“不充分”。这些是外科医生报告的分数,基于对现场血液自由程度的满意度。结果显示无死亡或并发症,包括围手术期心肌梗死、术后再探查出血、中风、肾衰竭或低输出综合征。综上所述,ProPlege装置和EndoVent导管是可靠的,可确保在MIAVR情况下有效的CS心脏骤停和肺动脉通气。领口提供了足够的心肌保护,可接受的心脏通气等级,以及在MIAVR手术期间无障碍的视觉和通道。需要进一步的研究来证明领口比传统技术的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of Percutaneous Pulmonary Vent and Coronary Sinus Cardioplegia in the Setting of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Experience
A lthough percutaneous pulmonary vent and coronary sinus (CS) cardioplegia have been identified as a fundamental skill to provide a safe surgical environment for patients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement (MIAVR), data on the feasibility and results of these have not yet been reported. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the reliability and efficacy of ProPlege and EndoVent catheters, commonly referred to as “necklines,” for intraoperative CS cardioplegia and pulmonary artery venting in the setting of MIAVR. The study evaluated the records of 51patients who underwent MIAVR either through upper hemisternotomy or right anterior thoracotomy. The ProPlege device was placed into the CS under transesophageal echocardiography and pressure guidance, and the EndoVent device was placed using pressure-curve monitoring by the anesthesiologist prior to the surgical procedure. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for aortic valve replacement was performed through a J-shaped upper hemisternotomy in 38 patients and a right anterior thoracotomy in 13 patients. Line performance, time needed for placement, rate of successful placement, and major perioperative complications were recorded and reviewed. Necklines were placed successfully in all patients, and the mean time for the placement was 14 ± 9 minutes for ProPlege and 9 ± 4 minutes for EndoVent. A total of 110 doses of retrograde cardioplegiawere delivered through the ProPlege device at a mean flow rate of 173±35mL/min and amean pressure of 41±6mmHg. Venting of the heart by the pulmonary catheter grading was “excellent” in 33 patients, “sufficient” in 12 patients, and “not adequate” in 2 patients. Thesewere surgeon-reported scores based on satisfaction in the degree of freedom from blood in the field. Results showed no deaths or complications, including perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative re-exploration for bleeding, stroke, kidney failure, or low-output syndrome. In conclusion, ProPlege devices and EndoVent catheters were found to be reliable and ensured effective CS cardioplegia and pulmonary artery venting in the setting of MIAVR. The necklines provided adequate myocardial protection, acceptable grade of venting of the heart, and unobstructed vision and access during MIAVR procedures. Further research is required to demonstrate the advantages of necklines over conventional techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Context is king - obstetric anaesthesia management strategies in limited resource settings. Preoperative Administration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: Do We Have Enough “VISION” to Stop It? Implementing a Statistical Model for Protamine Titration: Effects on Coagulation in Cardiac Surgical Patients Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock After Cardiac Surgery: Another “VASST” Difference? Prospective Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of the Pectoral Nerves (Pecs) Block Type II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1