小心翼翼地吃西红柿:体现了一种温和的方法

L. Pottinger
{"title":"小心翼翼地吃西红柿:体现了一种温和的方法","authors":"L. Pottinger","doi":"10.1111/area.12650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though feminist scholars have long advocated reflexivity in geographical research, the multifaceted practices of care that gently shape (and take shape within) fieldwork encounters are often tidied out of academic accounts. By foregrounding moments of embodied gentleness in research into human – plant relationships, this paper asks what a gentle methodological approach might look, and importantly, feel like. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork exploring gardeners' everyday activities and activisms with seeds and plants, I examine moments that are quiet, slow, tender, and unobtrusive to examine how research might be rendered gently. Building on feminist scholarship on bodies, slowness, and reciprocity, I argue gentleness is a necessary, if under ‐ acknowledged, dimension of interpersonal and more ‐ than ‐ human encounters. It requires embodied reflexivity and an active sensitivity to entanglements of care, emotion, and multisensoriality. Gentleness can be implicit, purposeful, or tactical, and it entails complexities and contradictions that must be unpicked. A gentle methodological approach can, however, hold particular utility for exposing and theorising under ‐ acknowledged forms of care ‐ full political and environmental action, which though light ‐ touch are nonetheless significant.","PeriodicalId":72297,"journal":{"name":"Area (Oxford, England)","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treading carefully through tomatoes: Embodying a gentle methodological approach\",\"authors\":\"L. Pottinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/area.12650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though feminist scholars have long advocated reflexivity in geographical research, the multifaceted practices of care that gently shape (and take shape within) fieldwork encounters are often tidied out of academic accounts. By foregrounding moments of embodied gentleness in research into human – plant relationships, this paper asks what a gentle methodological approach might look, and importantly, feel like. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork exploring gardeners' everyday activities and activisms with seeds and plants, I examine moments that are quiet, slow, tender, and unobtrusive to examine how research might be rendered gently. Building on feminist scholarship on bodies, slowness, and reciprocity, I argue gentleness is a necessary, if under ‐ acknowledged, dimension of interpersonal and more ‐ than ‐ human encounters. It requires embodied reflexivity and an active sensitivity to entanglements of care, emotion, and multisensoriality. Gentleness can be implicit, purposeful, or tactical, and it entails complexities and contradictions that must be unpicked. A gentle methodological approach can, however, hold particular utility for exposing and theorising under ‐ acknowledged forms of care ‐ full political and environmental action, which though light ‐ touch are nonetheless significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Area (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Area (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

尽管女权主义学者长期以来一直主张地理研究中的反身性,但在实地考察中,细心的多方面实践往往被整理出来。通过在人类与植物关系的研究中突出体现温柔的时刻,本文提出了一种温柔的方法论方法可能看起来,更重要的是,感觉起来像什么。在探索园丁的日常活动和与种子和植物的活动的民族志田野调查中,我检查了安静、缓慢、温柔和不引人注目的时刻,以检查如何温和地呈现研究。基于对身体、缓慢和互惠的女权主义研究,我认为温柔是人际交往和超越人际交往的必要维度,如果没有得到充分承认的话。它需要具体化的反身性和对关怀、情感和多感官的纠缠的积极敏感。温柔可以是含蓄的,有目的的,也可以是策略性的,它带来了必须解决的复杂性和矛盾。然而,一种温和的方法论方法可以在揭示和理论化公认的谨慎的政治和环境行动形式方面发挥特别的作用,尽管轻触,但意义重大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treading carefully through tomatoes: Embodying a gentle methodological approach
Though feminist scholars have long advocated reflexivity in geographical research, the multifaceted practices of care that gently shape (and take shape within) fieldwork encounters are often tidied out of academic accounts. By foregrounding moments of embodied gentleness in research into human – plant relationships, this paper asks what a gentle methodological approach might look, and importantly, feel like. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork exploring gardeners' everyday activities and activisms with seeds and plants, I examine moments that are quiet, slow, tender, and unobtrusive to examine how research might be rendered gently. Building on feminist scholarship on bodies, slowness, and reciprocity, I argue gentleness is a necessary, if under ‐ acknowledged, dimension of interpersonal and more ‐ than ‐ human encounters. It requires embodied reflexivity and an active sensitivity to entanglements of care, emotion, and multisensoriality. Gentleness can be implicit, purposeful, or tactical, and it entails complexities and contradictions that must be unpicked. A gentle methodological approach can, however, hold particular utility for exposing and theorising under ‐ acknowledged forms of care ‐ full political and environmental action, which though light ‐ touch are nonetheless significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Value Capture by Companies of Different Ownership, Tier, Size, and Distance to Market: A Cross‐Sectoral Analysis “A canary is supposed to sit in a cage and look at someone else’s happiness”: Domestic rewilding in fin‐de‐siècle st. petersburg Rewilding: An emotional nature Towards a critical geopolitics of China‐US rivalry: Pericentricity, Regional Conflicts and Transnational Connections Cities of neurodiversity: New directions for an urban geography of neurodiversity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1