{"title":"集会与代表性主张之间的密切关系:来自坦桑尼亚的证据","authors":"Dan Paget","doi":"10.1080/14662043.2023.2235158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Studies analyse what politicians communicate at rallies. Yet most do so to determine what politicians communicate at large. Therefore, they implicitly assume that what they communicate at rallies is what they communicate across media. I ask: what is particular to the meanings that politicians, and indeed audience members, make at rallies? I theorise the rally as a media genre, in which those present are simplified into two entities (“speakers”; and “audience”) and those entities engage in an asymmetric, interactive dialogue. I argue that these two features of rally genre facilitate, but do not necessitate, the making of representative claims. I analyse “speaker”-“audience” discourse at rallies in Tanzania. I find that politicians use their speech to make representative claims and craft dialogues with “audience” which induce them to co-declare those claims. Therefore, I find that there is an affinity between the rally and representative claim-making.","PeriodicalId":46038,"journal":{"name":"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS","volume":"101 1","pages":"376 - 398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The affinity between the rally and representative claim-making: evidence from Tanzania\",\"authors\":\"Dan Paget\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14662043.2023.2235158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Studies analyse what politicians communicate at rallies. Yet most do so to determine what politicians communicate at large. Therefore, they implicitly assume that what they communicate at rallies is what they communicate across media. I ask: what is particular to the meanings that politicians, and indeed audience members, make at rallies? I theorise the rally as a media genre, in which those present are simplified into two entities (“speakers”; and “audience”) and those entities engage in an asymmetric, interactive dialogue. I argue that these two features of rally genre facilitate, but do not necessitate, the making of representative claims. I analyse “speaker”-“audience” discourse at rallies in Tanzania. I find that politicians use their speech to make representative claims and craft dialogues with “audience” which induce them to co-declare those claims. Therefore, I find that there is an affinity between the rally and representative claim-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"376 - 398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2023.2235158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2023.2235158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
The affinity between the rally and representative claim-making: evidence from Tanzania
ABSTRACT Studies analyse what politicians communicate at rallies. Yet most do so to determine what politicians communicate at large. Therefore, they implicitly assume that what they communicate at rallies is what they communicate across media. I ask: what is particular to the meanings that politicians, and indeed audience members, make at rallies? I theorise the rally as a media genre, in which those present are simplified into two entities (“speakers”; and “audience”) and those entities engage in an asymmetric, interactive dialogue. I argue that these two features of rally genre facilitate, but do not necessitate, the making of representative claims. I analyse “speaker”-“audience” discourse at rallies in Tanzania. I find that politicians use their speech to make representative claims and craft dialogues with “audience” which induce them to co-declare those claims. Therefore, I find that there is an affinity between the rally and representative claim-making.
期刊介绍:
Long established as the leading publication in its field, the journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics contains scholarly articles which both report original research on the politics of Commonwealth countries and relate their findings to issues of general significance for students of comparative politics. The journal also publishes work on the politics of other states where such work is of interest for comparative politics generally or where it enables comparisons to be made with Commonwealth countries.