{"title":"尼日利亚马库尔迪犬巴贝斯虫病流行病学调查","authors":"E. Omudu, B. Atu, Jason Gbushum Ayashar","doi":"10.4314/ARI.V4I3.48685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prevalence of Babesia canis and their tck vectors was investgated in Makurd 108 dogs were screened for Babesia canis and 208 dogs were examined for tick ectoparasites. 10.2 % o the dogswere positive for Babesia canis infecton. Chi square analysis showed no significant difference in infection rates in male and female dogs (X2 = 2.579, df = 1, P > 005). 75.9 % of dogs examined for ticks were infested with either Rhipicephalus, Boophilus and Amblyomma species or combination ofthe three. The paws were the most preferred site of attachmentfor the tcks. 126 (79.6 %) of the 158 inested dogs had ticks on the paw (X2 = 10.388, df = 4, P > 005). The publc health implications of these findings especially as relates to the increasing incidence and prevalence of dog borne zoonotic infections are discussed. Keywords : Babesia canis , Ticks, Public health risk","PeriodicalId":7872,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research International","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiological survey of canine babesiosis in Makurdi, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"E. Omudu, B. Atu, Jason Gbushum Ayashar\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ARI.V4I3.48685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prevalence of Babesia canis and their tck vectors was investgated in Makurd 108 dogs were screened for Babesia canis and 208 dogs were examined for tick ectoparasites. 10.2 % o the dogswere positive for Babesia canis infecton. Chi square analysis showed no significant difference in infection rates in male and female dogs (X2 = 2.579, df = 1, P > 005). 75.9 % of dogs examined for ticks were infested with either Rhipicephalus, Boophilus and Amblyomma species or combination ofthe three. The paws were the most preferred site of attachmentfor the tcks. 126 (79.6 %) of the 158 inested dogs had ticks on the paw (X2 = 10.388, df = 4, P > 005). The publc health implications of these findings especially as relates to the increasing incidence and prevalence of dog borne zoonotic infections are discussed. Keywords : Babesia canis , Ticks, Public health risk\",\"PeriodicalId\":7872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Research International\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ARI.V4I3.48685\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ARI.V4I3.48685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
调查马库尔德市犬巴贝斯虫及其蜱虫媒介的流行情况,筛选犬巴贝斯虫108只,检查蜱虫外寄生208只。10.2%犬感染巴贝斯虫阳性。卡方分析显示,公犬和母犬的感染率差异无统计学意义(X2 = 2.579, df = 1, P < 0.05)。接受蜱虫检查的狗中,75.9%感染了鼻头虫、嗜乳虫和无足虫或三者的组合。爪子是乌鸦最喜欢的附着部位。158只犬中有126只(79.6%)爪上有蜱虫(X2 = 10.388, df = 4, P < 0.05)。这些发现对公共卫生的影响,特别是与狗传播的人畜共患感染的发病率和流行率增加有关。关键词:犬巴贝斯虫,蜱虫,公共卫生风险
Epidemiological survey of canine babesiosis in Makurdi, Nigeria
The prevalence of Babesia canis and their tck vectors was investgated in Makurd 108 dogs were screened for Babesia canis and 208 dogs were examined for tick ectoparasites. 10.2 % o the dogswere positive for Babesia canis infecton. Chi square analysis showed no significant difference in infection rates in male and female dogs (X2 = 2.579, df = 1, P > 005). 75.9 % of dogs examined for ticks were infested with either Rhipicephalus, Boophilus and Amblyomma species or combination ofthe three. The paws were the most preferred site of attachmentfor the tcks. 126 (79.6 %) of the 158 inested dogs had ticks on the paw (X2 = 10.388, df = 4, P > 005). The publc health implications of these findings especially as relates to the increasing incidence and prevalence of dog borne zoonotic infections are discussed. Keywords : Babesia canis , Ticks, Public health risk