让我们谈谈精神病。

Q4 Medicine Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2016-01-18
Ann Steele, Paul Chadwick, Rose McCabe
{"title":"让我们谈谈精神病。","authors":"Ann Steele, Paul Chadwick, Rose McCabe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research suggests that while patients wish to talk about positive psychotic symptoms, psychiatrists may be reluctant to do so in routine outpatient consultations.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the content, context and impact of discussion of positive symptoms within psychiatric consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thematic analysis was applied to first discussions of positive symptoms, and overall impact assessed on the length of the consultation and the therapeutic relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five of 143 consultations contained discussion of a positive psychotic symptom. Symptom discussion neither harmed the therapeutic relationship nor lengthened the consultation. Patients' disclosures strongly corresponded with psychological models of psychosis, emphasizing personal meaning and emotional impact. In contrast, psychiatrists focused on topographical characteristics, such as frequency and location. Strengths in psychiatric practice included using open questions, positive reinforcement and offering explanations tentatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support discussion of positive symptoms within outpatient consultations, to include necessary assessment of topography and risk alongside exploration of patients' subjective experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":40019,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","volume":"59 1","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let's Talk About Psychosis.\",\"authors\":\"Ann Steele, Paul Chadwick, Rose McCabe\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research suggests that while patients wish to talk about positive psychotic symptoms, psychiatrists may be reluctant to do so in routine outpatient consultations.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the content, context and impact of discussion of positive symptoms within psychiatric consultations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thematic analysis was applied to first discussions of positive symptoms, and overall impact assessed on the length of the consultation and the therapeutic relationship.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five of 143 consultations contained discussion of a positive psychotic symptom. Symptom discussion neither harmed the therapeutic relationship nor lengthened the consultation. Patients' disclosures strongly corresponded with psychological models of psychosis, emphasizing personal meaning and emotional impact. In contrast, psychiatrists focused on topographical characteristics, such as frequency and location. Strengths in psychiatric practice included using open questions, positive reinforcement and offering explanations tentatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support discussion of positive symptoms within outpatient consultations, to include necessary assessment of topography and risk alongside exploration of patients' subjective experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"69-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,当患者希望谈论阳性精神病症状时,精神科医生可能不愿意在常规门诊会诊中这样做。目的:探讨精神科会诊中讨论阳性症状的内容、背景和影响。方法:对阳性症状的首次讨论采用专题分析,并对会诊时间和治疗关系的总体影响进行评估。结果:143个咨询中有65个包含了阳性精神病症状的讨论。症状讨论既不损害治疗关系,也不延长会诊时间。患者的披露与精神病的心理模型密切相关,强调个人意义和情感影响。相比之下,精神科医生关注的是地形特征,比如频率和位置。精神病学实践的优势包括使用开放式问题,积极强化和提供试探性解释。结论:研究结果支持在门诊会诊中讨论阳性症状,包括对地形和风险的必要评估以及对患者主观经验的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Let's Talk About Psychosis.

Background: Research suggests that while patients wish to talk about positive psychotic symptoms, psychiatrists may be reluctant to do so in routine outpatient consultations.

Aims: To explore the content, context and impact of discussion of positive symptoms within psychiatric consultations.

Methods: Thematic analysis was applied to first discussions of positive symptoms, and overall impact assessed on the length of the consultation and the therapeutic relationship.

Results: Sixty-five of 143 consultations contained discussion of a positive psychotic symptom. Symptom discussion neither harmed the therapeutic relationship nor lengthened the consultation. Patients' disclosures strongly corresponded with psychological models of psychosis, emphasizing personal meaning and emotional impact. In contrast, psychiatrists focused on topographical characteristics, such as frequency and location. Strengths in psychiatric practice included using open questions, positive reinforcement and offering explanations tentatively.

Conclusions: Findings support discussion of positive symptoms within outpatient consultations, to include necessary assessment of topography and risk alongside exploration of patients' subjective experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The vision of the exciting new peer-reviewed quarterly publication Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses (CS) is to provide psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals with the latest research and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses. CS is a practice-oriented publication focused exclusively on the newest research findings, guidelines, treatment protocols, and clinical trials relevant to patient care.
期刊最新文献
Dysexecutive Behavior in First-Episode Schizophrenia. Dysexecutive Behavior in First-Episode Schizophrenia Grading meningiomas by used imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging The Association between Serum Levels of Ferritin and D-Dimer with Liver Function Tests in Patients with COVID-19 Role of Susceptibility Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Neurological Diagnosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1