阿育吠陀、乌纳尼、悉陀和顺势疗法药物作为辅助治疗COVID-19:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

A. Dixit, D. Javed, S. Mukherjee, S. Anwar, Nibha Giri
{"title":"阿育吠陀、乌纳尼、悉陀和顺势疗法药物作为辅助治疗COVID-19:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"A. Dixit, D. Javed, S. Mukherjee, S. Anwar, Nibha Giri","doi":"10.4103/jopcs.jopcs_13_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, and Homoeopathy (AYUSH); India's traditional medical system has made significant contributions to COVID-19. However, the results of controlled trials were mixed. To reach factual conclusions, we conducted systematic study and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: An exhaustive literature search on COVID-19 and AYUSH was conducted using electroinic databases such as PubMed/Medline, CAM-QUEST, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since inception to February 2022. Pooled estimates of the parameters were assessed in terms of standard mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (rr) using RevMan software. Risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies and across studies was assessed through Cochrane tool of bias and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, respectively. Results: A total of 13 studies out of 650 articles were considered for the meta-analysis. Combined therapy showed greater effect to recovery rate and period (RR = 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.11–0.55] P = 0.0007) (mean differences [MD] = −2.29, 95% CI − 4.62–0.04, P = 0.05), respectively. Cycle threshold value of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (MD = −2.16, 95% CI − 2.90– −1.43, P < 0.00001), interleukin (IL)-6 (MD = −0.31, 95% CI − 0.57 –−0.05, P = 0.02), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (MD = −3.38, 95% CI − 4.25 – −2.51, P < 0.00001), lactate dehydrogenase (MD = −1.97, 95% CI − 2.57 to − 1.38, P < 0.00001). In homeopathy preventive trial, lesser number of occurrences of events were found (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% CI 0.03–0.47, P = 0.002). RoB was unclear. Conclusion: COVID-19 may benefit from AYUSH interventions as an adjunct. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate and validate this.","PeriodicalId":93784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary care specialties : official publication of the Institute of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"9 1","pages":"49 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, and Homoeopathy medicines as an adjuvant in the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"A. Dixit, D. Javed, S. Mukherjee, S. Anwar, Nibha Giri\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jopcs.jopcs_13_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, and Homoeopathy (AYUSH); India's traditional medical system has made significant contributions to COVID-19. However, the results of controlled trials were mixed. To reach factual conclusions, we conducted systematic study and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: An exhaustive literature search on COVID-19 and AYUSH was conducted using electroinic databases such as PubMed/Medline, CAM-QUEST, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since inception to February 2022. Pooled estimates of the parameters were assessed in terms of standard mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (rr) using RevMan software. Risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies and across studies was assessed through Cochrane tool of bias and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, respectively. Results: A total of 13 studies out of 650 articles were considered for the meta-analysis. Combined therapy showed greater effect to recovery rate and period (RR = 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.11–0.55] P = 0.0007) (mean differences [MD] = −2.29, 95% CI − 4.62–0.04, P = 0.05), respectively. Cycle threshold value of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (MD = −2.16, 95% CI − 2.90– −1.43, P < 0.00001), interleukin (IL)-6 (MD = −0.31, 95% CI − 0.57 –−0.05, P = 0.02), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (MD = −3.38, 95% CI − 4.25 – −2.51, P < 0.00001), lactate dehydrogenase (MD = −1.97, 95% CI − 2.57 to − 1.38, P < 0.00001). In homeopathy preventive trial, lesser number of occurrences of events were found (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% CI 0.03–0.47, P = 0.002). RoB was unclear. Conclusion: COVID-19 may benefit from AYUSH interventions as an adjunct. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate and validate this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of primary care specialties : official publication of the Institute of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"49 - 62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of primary care specialties : official publication of the Institute of Family Medicine and Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jopcs.jopcs_13_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary care specialties : official publication of the Institute of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jopcs.jopcs_13_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的:阿育吠陀,瑜伽,尤那尼,悉达和顺势疗法(AYUSH);印度传统医疗体系为抗击新冠肺炎做出了重要贡献。然而,对照试验的结果却喜忧参半。为了得出事实性结论,我们进行了系统研究和荟萃分析。材料和方法:使用PubMed/Medline、CAM-QUEST和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials等电子数据库,从成立到2022年2月,对COVID-19和AYUSH进行了详尽的文献检索。使用RevMan软件根据标准平均差(SMD)和相对风险(rr)评估参数的汇总估计值。分别通过Cochrane偏倚工具和推荐分级、评估分级、发展分级和评价分级方法评估单个研究和跨研究的偏倚风险(RoB)。结果:650篇文章中有13篇研究被纳入meta分析。联合治疗对治愈率和治愈期的影响更大(RR = 0.24, 95%可信区间[CI] [0.11-0.55] P = 0.0007)(平均差异[MD] = - 2.29, 95% CI = - 4.62-0.04, P = 0.05)。逆转录聚合酶链反应的周期阈值(MD = - 2.16, 95% CI−2.90 ~−1.43,P < 0.00001)、白细胞介素(IL)-6 (MD = - 0.31, 95% CI−0.57 ~−0.05,P = 0.02)、肿瘤坏死因子- α (MD = - 3.38, 95% CI−4.25 ~−2.51,P < 0.00001)、乳酸脱氢酶(MD = - 1.97, 95% CI−2.57 ~−1.38,P < 0.00001)。顺势疗法预防试验中发现的事件发生率较低(优势比= 0.12,95% CI 0.03 ~ 0.47, P = 0.002)。罗布不清楚。结论:COVID-19可能受益于AYUSH辅助干预措施。需要高质量的随机对照试验来评价和验证这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ayurveda, Unani, Siddha, and Homoeopathy medicines as an adjuvant in the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Background and Objectives: Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha, and Homoeopathy (AYUSH); India's traditional medical system has made significant contributions to COVID-19. However, the results of controlled trials were mixed. To reach factual conclusions, we conducted systematic study and meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: An exhaustive literature search on COVID-19 and AYUSH was conducted using electroinic databases such as PubMed/Medline, CAM-QUEST, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials since inception to February 2022. Pooled estimates of the parameters were assessed in terms of standard mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (rr) using RevMan software. Risk of bias (RoB) in individual studies and across studies was assessed through Cochrane tool of bias and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, respectively. Results: A total of 13 studies out of 650 articles were considered for the meta-analysis. Combined therapy showed greater effect to recovery rate and period (RR = 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.11–0.55] P = 0.0007) (mean differences [MD] = −2.29, 95% CI − 4.62–0.04, P = 0.05), respectively. Cycle threshold value of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (MD = −2.16, 95% CI − 2.90– −1.43, P < 0.00001), interleukin (IL)-6 (MD = −0.31, 95% CI − 0.57 –−0.05, P = 0.02), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (MD = −3.38, 95% CI − 4.25 – −2.51, P < 0.00001), lactate dehydrogenase (MD = −1.97, 95% CI − 2.57 to − 1.38, P < 0.00001). In homeopathy preventive trial, lesser number of occurrences of events were found (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% CI 0.03–0.47, P = 0.002). RoB was unclear. Conclusion: COVID-19 may benefit from AYUSH interventions as an adjunct. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to evaluate and validate this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care setup: A cross-sectional observational single-center-based study in Eastern India Knowledge and perceptions of medical students about generic medicines in a medical college in North India Acute undifferentiated fever presenting as multi-organ dysfunction: Narrowing the differential diagnosis A study on patients with pleural effusion with emphasis on pleural fluid adenosine deaminase and pleural biopsy Corticosteroid-induced avascular bone necrosis and possible association with prior COVID-19 infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1