第一次和第二次肾移植后患者和移植肾的存活率

M. Khubutiya, A. Pinchuk, N. Shmarina, I. Dmitriev, V. Vinogradov, A. Kazantsev, A. Balkarov
{"title":"第一次和第二次肾移植后患者和移植肾的存活率","authors":"M. Khubutiya, A. Pinchuk, N. Shmarina, I. Dmitriev, V. Vinogradov, A. Kazantsev, A. Balkarov","doi":"10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-2-130-140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Expanding donation criteria is one way of solving the problem of the increasing need of transplantation. The article is dedicated to comparison of the outcomes of first and second repeated kidney transplantation using grafts from standard criteria and expanded criteria donors.Aim. To evaluate 1-year and 5-year recipient and kidney graft survival rates after first and second kidney transplantation according to the donor type – standard criteria or expanded criteria donors.Material and methods. From 2007 till 2019 we performed 1459 kidney transplantations. The comparison study of outcomes of first (n=196) and second (n=143) kidney transplantations from standard criteria (n=245) and expanded criteria (n=94) donors was made.Results. There were no significant differences in a 1-year patient survival according to the donor type (98% and 95%, p=0.13). A 5-year recipient survival was significantly poorer after kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors (97.6% and 88%, p=0.01). There were no significant differences in 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates according to the order of transplantation (p=0.21 and p=0.36). We found no significant difference in 1-year recipient survival after kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors according to the order of transplantation (p=0.50). A 5-year recipient survival was significantly difference poorer after second kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors (p=0.04). One-year and 5-year graft survival rates were significantly lower after kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors (94%, 88% vs 86%, 65%, p=0.0025 and p=0.0011, respectively). One-year and 5-year survival rates were higher after first kidney transplantation from standard criteria donors in comparison with second kidney transplantation (p=0.052 and p=0.02, statistically significant in both cases). Analyzing outcomes of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors we found 1-year and 5-year graft survivals to be higher after first kidney transplantation comparing with second kidney transplantation (p=0.030 and p=0.018, statistically significant in both cases).Conclusion. In case of second organ transplantation, it is reasonable to use organs from standard criteria donors.","PeriodicalId":23229,"journal":{"name":"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and kidney graft survival rates after first and second kidney transplantation\",\"authors\":\"M. Khubutiya, A. Pinchuk, N. Shmarina, I. Dmitriev, V. Vinogradov, A. Kazantsev, A. Balkarov\",\"doi\":\"10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-2-130-140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Expanding donation criteria is one way of solving the problem of the increasing need of transplantation. The article is dedicated to comparison of the outcomes of first and second repeated kidney transplantation using grafts from standard criteria and expanded criteria donors.Aim. To evaluate 1-year and 5-year recipient and kidney graft survival rates after first and second kidney transplantation according to the donor type – standard criteria or expanded criteria donors.Material and methods. From 2007 till 2019 we performed 1459 kidney transplantations. The comparison study of outcomes of first (n=196) and second (n=143) kidney transplantations from standard criteria (n=245) and expanded criteria (n=94) donors was made.Results. There were no significant differences in a 1-year patient survival according to the donor type (98% and 95%, p=0.13). A 5-year recipient survival was significantly poorer after kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors (97.6% and 88%, p=0.01). There were no significant differences in 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates according to the order of transplantation (p=0.21 and p=0.36). We found no significant difference in 1-year recipient survival after kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors according to the order of transplantation (p=0.50). A 5-year recipient survival was significantly difference poorer after second kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors (p=0.04). One-year and 5-year graft survival rates were significantly lower after kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors (94%, 88% vs 86%, 65%, p=0.0025 and p=0.0011, respectively). One-year and 5-year survival rates were higher after first kidney transplantation from standard criteria donors in comparison with second kidney transplantation (p=0.052 and p=0.02, statistically significant in both cases). Analyzing outcomes of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors we found 1-year and 5-year graft survivals to be higher after first kidney transplantation comparing with second kidney transplantation (p=0.030 and p=0.018, statistically significant in both cases).Conclusion. In case of second organ transplantation, it is reasonable to use organs from standard criteria donors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-2-130-140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-2-130-140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

介绍。扩大捐献标准是解决日益增长的移植需求问题的途径之一。本文旨在比较标准供者和扩大供者首次和第二次重复肾移植的结果。根据供体类型标准或扩大标准供体,评价第一次和第二次肾移植术后1年和5年的受者和肾移植存活率。材料和方法。从2007年到2019年,我们进行了1459例肾移植手术。对标准供者(245例)和扩大标准供者(94例)第一次(196例)和第二次(143例)肾移植的结果进行了比较研究。不同供体类型患者的1年生存率无显著差异(98%和95%,p=0.13)。扩大标准供者肾移植后受者的5年生存率明显较差(97.6%和88%,p=0.01)。移植顺序不同,1年和5年移植存活率差异无统计学意义(p=0.21和p=0.36)。我们发现根据移植顺序,扩大标准供者肾移植后1年生存率无显著差异(p=0.50)。扩大标准供者的第二次肾移植后,受者的5年生存率显著降低(p=0.04)。扩大标准供者肾移植术后1年和5年移植存活率显著降低(分别为94%、88%、86%、65%,p=0.0025和p=0.0011)。与第二次肾移植相比,标准供者第一次肾移植的1年和5年生存率更高(p=0.052和p=0.02,两种情况均有统计学意义)。分析扩大标准供者肾移植的结果,我们发现第一次肾移植后的1年和5年移植存活率高于第二次肾移植(p=0.030和p=0.018,两种情况均有统计学意义)。如果是二次器官移植,使用标准供者的器官是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient and kidney graft survival rates after first and second kidney transplantation
Introduction. Expanding donation criteria is one way of solving the problem of the increasing need of transplantation. The article is dedicated to comparison of the outcomes of first and second repeated kidney transplantation using grafts from standard criteria and expanded criteria donors.Aim. To evaluate 1-year and 5-year recipient and kidney graft survival rates after first and second kidney transplantation according to the donor type – standard criteria or expanded criteria donors.Material and methods. From 2007 till 2019 we performed 1459 kidney transplantations. The comparison study of outcomes of first (n=196) and second (n=143) kidney transplantations from standard criteria (n=245) and expanded criteria (n=94) donors was made.Results. There were no significant differences in a 1-year patient survival according to the donor type (98% and 95%, p=0.13). A 5-year recipient survival was significantly poorer after kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors (97.6% and 88%, p=0.01). There were no significant differences in 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates according to the order of transplantation (p=0.21 and p=0.36). We found no significant difference in 1-year recipient survival after kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors according to the order of transplantation (p=0.50). A 5-year recipient survival was significantly difference poorer after second kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors (p=0.04). One-year and 5-year graft survival rates were significantly lower after kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors (94%, 88% vs 86%, 65%, p=0.0025 and p=0.0011, respectively). One-year and 5-year survival rates were higher after first kidney transplantation from standard criteria donors in comparison with second kidney transplantation (p=0.052 and p=0.02, statistically significant in both cases). Analyzing outcomes of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors we found 1-year and 5-year graft survivals to be higher after first kidney transplantation comparing with second kidney transplantation (p=0.030 and p=0.018, statistically significant in both cases).Conclusion. In case of second organ transplantation, it is reasonable to use organs from standard criteria donors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern view on calcification of xenogenic bioprosthetic heart valves and their anti-calcification treatment strategies Effect of tocilizumab on pulmonary gas exchange function in patients with severe COVID-19 Cerebral dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction The role of oxygenation in kidney and liver machine perfusion Dynamics of cognitive functions in patients with hemoblastosis treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1