性别对同龄人在课间接受或拒绝的影响

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Revista De Educacion Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2020-387-440
M. I. L. Rico, T. Cruz, M. E. Llamazares, M. E. Palomo, Jonathan Huelmo García, María Carmen Palmero Cámara, Juan Alfredo Jiménez Eguizábal
{"title":"性别对同龄人在课间接受或拒绝的影响","authors":"M. I. L. Rico, T. Cruz, M. E. Llamazares, M. E. Palomo, Jonathan Huelmo García, María Carmen Palmero Cámara, Juan Alfredo Jiménez Eguizábal","doi":"10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2020-387-440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Within the construction of personality, relationships between equals are increasingly meaningful, a trend reinforced by the incorporation into the school environment from an early age. This school environment is essential for the processes of adaptation and personal adjustment where gender is built. The present work is focused on the playground as a space and time that takes place during school hours and facilitates both coexistence and interpersonal relationships. Objective: to determine if gender influences the acceptance and rejection relationships that occur during recess in primary and secondary schools, both when choosing and / or rejecting their peers, and in the motivations that justify said choice and / or rejection. Methodology: Mixed, centered on the interpretive paradigm that combines quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results: Girls and boys choose girls and boys respectively, both in the first and second option respectively, to interact during recess due to personality (fun, friendly, funny), friendship (best friend) and play reasons. Regarding rejection, there is a significant relationship with gender, but in a different sense than expected. Both girls and boys reject in first and second place mostly boys. The reasons are related to the personality of the rejected partner, affective characteristics, and differences in the type of games. Conclusions: Acceptance relationships in the playground are related to gender. This pattern, however, is not manifested in the rejection, that occur mainly for reasons of personality, affection, and discrepancies in the type of game. These motivations induce theoretical and practical implications regarding the reorganization of the playground and the utility of a socio-emotional intervention programs on gender equality, cooperation, and interpersonal relations and promotes social and educational inclusion.","PeriodicalId":21314,"journal":{"name":"Revista De Educacion","volume":"7 1","pages":"89-116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influencia del género en la aceptación o rechazo entre iguales en el recreo\",\"authors\":\"M. I. L. Rico, T. Cruz, M. E. Llamazares, M. E. Palomo, Jonathan Huelmo García, María Carmen Palmero Cámara, Juan Alfredo Jiménez Eguizábal\",\"doi\":\"10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2020-387-440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Within the construction of personality, relationships between equals are increasingly meaningful, a trend reinforced by the incorporation into the school environment from an early age. This school environment is essential for the processes of adaptation and personal adjustment where gender is built. The present work is focused on the playground as a space and time that takes place during school hours and facilitates both coexistence and interpersonal relationships. Objective: to determine if gender influences the acceptance and rejection relationships that occur during recess in primary and secondary schools, both when choosing and / or rejecting their peers, and in the motivations that justify said choice and / or rejection. Methodology: Mixed, centered on the interpretive paradigm that combines quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results: Girls and boys choose girls and boys respectively, both in the first and second option respectively, to interact during recess due to personality (fun, friendly, funny), friendship (best friend) and play reasons. Regarding rejection, there is a significant relationship with gender, but in a different sense than expected. Both girls and boys reject in first and second place mostly boys. The reasons are related to the personality of the rejected partner, affective characteristics, and differences in the type of games. Conclusions: Acceptance relationships in the playground are related to gender. This pattern, however, is not manifested in the rejection, that occur mainly for reasons of personality, affection, and discrepancies in the type of game. These motivations induce theoretical and practical implications regarding the reorganization of the playground and the utility of a socio-emotional intervention programs on gender equality, cooperation, and interpersonal relations and promotes social and educational inclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista De Educacion\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"89-116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista De Educacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2020-387-440\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista De Educacion","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2020-387-440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

引言:在人格的建构中,平等之间的关系越来越有意义,这一趋势由于从小就融入学校环境而得到加强。这种学校环境对于建立性别的适应和个人调整过程至关重要。目前的工作集中在操场上,作为一个空间和时间,发生在学校时间,促进共存和人际关系。目的:确定性别是否影响小学和中学课间休息期间选择和/或拒绝同伴时的接受和拒绝关系,以及证明选择和/或拒绝的动机。方法论:混合型,以定量分析和定性分析相结合的解释范式为中心。结果:女生和男生分别在第一和第二选项中选择女生和男生进行课间互动,原因分别是性格(有趣、友好、有趣)、友谊(最好的朋友)和玩耍。关于拒绝,与性别有显著的关系,但与预期的意义不同。女孩和男孩都拒绝第一名和第二名,主要是男孩。原因与被拒绝伴侣的个性、情感特征和游戏类型的差异有关。结论:操场接纳关系与性别有关。然而,这种模式并没有在拒绝中表现出来,拒绝主要是由于个性、情感和游戏类型的差异。这些动机引发了关于操场重组和社会情感干预项目在性别平等、合作和人际关系方面的效用的理论和实践意义,并促进了社会和教育包容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influencia del género en la aceptación o rechazo entre iguales en el recreo
Introduction: Within the construction of personality, relationships between equals are increasingly meaningful, a trend reinforced by the incorporation into the school environment from an early age. This school environment is essential for the processes of adaptation and personal adjustment where gender is built. The present work is focused on the playground as a space and time that takes place during school hours and facilitates both coexistence and interpersonal relationships. Objective: to determine if gender influences the acceptance and rejection relationships that occur during recess in primary and secondary schools, both when choosing and / or rejecting their peers, and in the motivations that justify said choice and / or rejection. Methodology: Mixed, centered on the interpretive paradigm that combines quantitative and qualitative analysis. Results: Girls and boys choose girls and boys respectively, both in the first and second option respectively, to interact during recess due to personality (fun, friendly, funny), friendship (best friend) and play reasons. Regarding rejection, there is a significant relationship with gender, but in a different sense than expected. Both girls and boys reject in first and second place mostly boys. The reasons are related to the personality of the rejected partner, affective characteristics, and differences in the type of games. Conclusions: Acceptance relationships in the playground are related to gender. This pattern, however, is not manifested in the rejection, that occur mainly for reasons of personality, affection, and discrepancies in the type of game. These motivations induce theoretical and practical implications regarding the reorganization of the playground and the utility of a socio-emotional intervention programs on gender equality, cooperation, and interpersonal relations and promotes social and educational inclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista De Educacion
Revista De Educacion EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista de Educación es una publicación científica del Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional español. Fundada en 1940, y manteniendo el título de Revista de Educación desde 1952, es un testigo privilegiado de la evolución de la educación en las últimas décadas, así como un reconocido medio de difusión de los avances en la investigación y la innovación en este campo, tanto desde una perspectiva nacional como internacional. La revista es editada por la Subdirección General de Atención al Ciudadano, Documentación y Publicaciones, y actualmente está adscrita al Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa de la Dirección General de Evaluación y Cooperación Territorial. Cada año se publican cuatro números con tres secciones: Investigaciones, Ensayos y Reseñas. Uno de los números anuales podrá contar con una sección Monográfica con convocatoria pública en esta web. Todos los artículos enviados a las diferentes secciones están sometidos a evaluación externa. En el primer número del año se incluye un índice bibliográfico, y en el segundo un editorial con la Memoria anual que recoge las principales estadísticas del proceso editor de ese período, los índices de calidad e impacto, así como el listado de revisores externos.
期刊最新文献
PISA 2018 in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales: Is the data really representative of all four corners of the UK? The structures and processes governing education research in the UK from 1990-2020: A systematic scoping review Modelo para las pruebas de admisión a los estudios de maestro a partir de un proceso de diseño participativo Context and Implications Document for: Teaching sciences and mathematics—A challenge for higher education institutions: A systematic review Teaching sciences and mathematics – A challenge for higher education institutions: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1