{"title":"隐私是获取药物的代价","authors":"Laura Karas","doi":"10.52214/stlr.v23i1.9390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to the recent increase in FDA-approved specialty drugs and escalating specialty drug prices, drug companies now offer patient support programs (“PSPs”) for eligible patients prescribed a particular pharmaceutical drug. Such programs encompass both financial assistance for the purchase of a specialty drug and behavioral services, including nursing support and injection training, intended to improve drug adherence. Although ostensibly gratuitous, these programs have a steep and underappreciated cost: disclosure of protected health information. In effect, patient support programs compel patients to trade protected health information for drug access. This Article provides the first in- depth examination of the legal and ethical concerns associated with patient support programs. Enrollment in a drug company’s patient support program furnishes the company with linked patient- and prescriber- identifying information for each enrollee, data which may enable drug companies to target marketing to patients and healthcare providers with an otherwise unattainable degree of precision. Moreover, once a drug company acquires an enrollee’s protected health information pursuant to a valid Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization, a drug company faces few limits on downstream uses of those data. This Article illuminates a possible role for patient support program-mediated data collection in two unlawful drug company practices: (1) kickback schemes in coordination with foundations that cover pharmaceutical drug copays, and (2) “product hopping” to a new brand-name drug formulation after patent expiration of an older formulation. The current regime for health data privacy in the United States lacks adequate safeguards to prevent drug companies from exploiting patient support program-derived data to the detriment of patients. The Article ends by proposing practical modifications to the HIPAA Privacy Rule to modernize HIPAA’s protections vis-à-vis health data transferred from covered entities to noncovered entities such as drug companies.","PeriodicalId":87208,"journal":{"name":"The Columbia science and technology law review","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy as the Price of Drug Access\",\"authors\":\"Laura Karas\",\"doi\":\"10.52214/stlr.v23i1.9390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In response to the recent increase in FDA-approved specialty drugs and escalating specialty drug prices, drug companies now offer patient support programs (“PSPs”) for eligible patients prescribed a particular pharmaceutical drug. Such programs encompass both financial assistance for the purchase of a specialty drug and behavioral services, including nursing support and injection training, intended to improve drug adherence. Although ostensibly gratuitous, these programs have a steep and underappreciated cost: disclosure of protected health information. In effect, patient support programs compel patients to trade protected health information for drug access. This Article provides the first in- depth examination of the legal and ethical concerns associated with patient support programs. Enrollment in a drug company’s patient support program furnishes the company with linked patient- and prescriber- identifying information for each enrollee, data which may enable drug companies to target marketing to patients and healthcare providers with an otherwise unattainable degree of precision. Moreover, once a drug company acquires an enrollee’s protected health information pursuant to a valid Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization, a drug company faces few limits on downstream uses of those data. This Article illuminates a possible role for patient support program-mediated data collection in two unlawful drug company practices: (1) kickback schemes in coordination with foundations that cover pharmaceutical drug copays, and (2) “product hopping” to a new brand-name drug formulation after patent expiration of an older formulation. The current regime for health data privacy in the United States lacks adequate safeguards to prevent drug companies from exploiting patient support program-derived data to the detriment of patients. The Article ends by proposing practical modifications to the HIPAA Privacy Rule to modernize HIPAA’s protections vis-à-vis health data transferred from covered entities to noncovered entities such as drug companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Columbia science and technology law review\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Columbia science and technology law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52214/stlr.v23i1.9390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Columbia science and technology law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52214/stlr.v23i1.9390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为了应对最近fda批准的特殊药物的增加和不断上涨的特殊药物价格,制药公司现在为处方特定药物的合格患者提供患者支持计划(“psp”)。这些计划既包括购买特殊药物的财政援助,也包括旨在提高药物依从性的行为服务,包括护理支持和注射培训。虽然这些项目表面上是无偿的,但却有一个高昂而未被重视的代价:泄露受保护的健康信息。实际上,患者支持计划迫使患者以受保护的健康信息换取药物获取。这篇文章提供了与病人支持计划相关的法律和伦理问题的第一次深入检查。在制药公司的患者支持计划中注册,为公司提供了每个注册者的相关患者和处方者识别信息,这些数据可以使制药公司以其他方式无法达到的精确程度对患者和医疗保健提供者进行目标营销。此外,一旦制药公司根据有效的《健康保险流通与责任法案》(health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, HIPAA)授权获得了参保人受保护的健康信息,制药公司对这些数据的下游使用几乎没有限制。本文阐明了患者支持计划介导的数据收集在两种非法制药公司实践中的可能作用:(1)与涵盖药品共同支付的基金会协调的回扣计划,以及(2)在旧配方专利到期后“产品跳转”到新的品牌药物配方。美国目前的健康数据隐私制度缺乏足够的保障措施,无法防止制药公司利用患者支持方案衍生的数据损害患者的利益。文章最后提出了对HIPAA隐私规则的实际修改,以使HIPAA对-à-vis健康数据从覆盖实体转移到非覆盖实体(如制药公司)的保护现代化。
In response to the recent increase in FDA-approved specialty drugs and escalating specialty drug prices, drug companies now offer patient support programs (“PSPs”) for eligible patients prescribed a particular pharmaceutical drug. Such programs encompass both financial assistance for the purchase of a specialty drug and behavioral services, including nursing support and injection training, intended to improve drug adherence. Although ostensibly gratuitous, these programs have a steep and underappreciated cost: disclosure of protected health information. In effect, patient support programs compel patients to trade protected health information for drug access. This Article provides the first in- depth examination of the legal and ethical concerns associated with patient support programs. Enrollment in a drug company’s patient support program furnishes the company with linked patient- and prescriber- identifying information for each enrollee, data which may enable drug companies to target marketing to patients and healthcare providers with an otherwise unattainable degree of precision. Moreover, once a drug company acquires an enrollee’s protected health information pursuant to a valid Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization, a drug company faces few limits on downstream uses of those data. This Article illuminates a possible role for patient support program-mediated data collection in two unlawful drug company practices: (1) kickback schemes in coordination with foundations that cover pharmaceutical drug copays, and (2) “product hopping” to a new brand-name drug formulation after patent expiration of an older formulation. The current regime for health data privacy in the United States lacks adequate safeguards to prevent drug companies from exploiting patient support program-derived data to the detriment of patients. The Article ends by proposing practical modifications to the HIPAA Privacy Rule to modernize HIPAA’s protections vis-à-vis health data transferred from covered entities to noncovered entities such as drug companies.