Zepeng Wang, Yansheng Mao, Dan Xin, Haoming Li, Zhe Liang
{"title":"魔鬼在于韵律","authors":"Zepeng Wang, Yansheng Mao, Dan Xin, Haoming Li, Zhe Liang","doi":"10.1075/cld.22006.wan","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The current paper reports on a study investigating the prosodic features of the Chinese discourse marker\n haole. The data were collected from 14 native Chinese speakers who participated in two recording sessions\n designed by the authors. The results indicate that haole as a discourse marker occurring at different syntactic\n positions is prosodically distinct. Specifically, in some cases, haole at the left periphery (LP) is prosodically\n independent of its following utterance, while haole at the right periphery (RP) is always prosodically attached\n to its preceding utterance. In addition, haole at LP is higher, larger, and longer than haole at\n RP, respectively, concerning pitch, intensity, and duration. The study suggests that these differences are closely related to the\n pragmatic functions of haole as a discourse marker in oral interaction. The findings above may shed light on the\n incorporation of prosody into the pragmatic analysis of discourse markers and conversation management in general.","PeriodicalId":42144,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Language and Discourse","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The devil lies in prosody\",\"authors\":\"Zepeng Wang, Yansheng Mao, Dan Xin, Haoming Li, Zhe Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/cld.22006.wan\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The current paper reports on a study investigating the prosodic features of the Chinese discourse marker\\n haole. The data were collected from 14 native Chinese speakers who participated in two recording sessions\\n designed by the authors. The results indicate that haole as a discourse marker occurring at different syntactic\\n positions is prosodically distinct. Specifically, in some cases, haole at the left periphery (LP) is prosodically\\n independent of its following utterance, while haole at the right periphery (RP) is always prosodically attached\\n to its preceding utterance. In addition, haole at LP is higher, larger, and longer than haole at\\n RP, respectively, concerning pitch, intensity, and duration. The study suggests that these differences are closely related to the\\n pragmatic functions of haole as a discourse marker in oral interaction. The findings above may shed light on the\\n incorporation of prosody into the pragmatic analysis of discourse markers and conversation management in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Language and Discourse\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Language and Discourse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.22006.wan\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Language and Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.22006.wan","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The current paper reports on a study investigating the prosodic features of the Chinese discourse marker
haole. The data were collected from 14 native Chinese speakers who participated in two recording sessions
designed by the authors. The results indicate that haole as a discourse marker occurring at different syntactic
positions is prosodically distinct. Specifically, in some cases, haole at the left periphery (LP) is prosodically
independent of its following utterance, while haole at the right periphery (RP) is always prosodically attached
to its preceding utterance. In addition, haole at LP is higher, larger, and longer than haole at
RP, respectively, concerning pitch, intensity, and duration. The study suggests that these differences are closely related to the
pragmatic functions of haole as a discourse marker in oral interaction. The findings above may shed light on the
incorporation of prosody into the pragmatic analysis of discourse markers and conversation management in general.