现代,高贵,道德

IF 0.6 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS Pub Date : 2022-10-24 DOI:10.15367/com.v5i1.565
Gordon J. Tolle
{"title":"现代,高贵,道德","authors":"Gordon J. Tolle","doi":"10.15367/com.v5i1.565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contrary to other scholarship on Strauss, this paper argues that Strauss understands himself as having decisively rejected Nietzschean thought. First, I hold that notwithstanding the agreement between Strauss and Nietzsche on the critique of modern culture, the defects of liberal democracy, and the flaws in some kinds of historicism, Strauss sees Nietzsche as unable to extricate himself from the trap of modern standards. Nietzsche's philosophy needs natural standards, but he denies that nature provides them. Second, I maintain that Strauss thinks Nietzsche differs from the classical standard of nobility and opposes the classics on the nature of man: for Nietzsche there are no natural ends. Third, I argue that in Strauss's view Nietzsche decisively rejects citizen morality and justice, whereas Strauss regards them as beneficial and politically defensible because they point the way toward his higher standard of natural right.","PeriodicalId":46038,"journal":{"name":"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modernity, Nobility, Morality\",\"authors\":\"Gordon J. Tolle\",\"doi\":\"10.15367/com.v5i1.565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contrary to other scholarship on Strauss, this paper argues that Strauss understands himself as having decisively rejected Nietzschean thought. First, I hold that notwithstanding the agreement between Strauss and Nietzsche on the critique of modern culture, the defects of liberal democracy, and the flaws in some kinds of historicism, Strauss sees Nietzsche as unable to extricate himself from the trap of modern standards. Nietzsche's philosophy needs natural standards, but he denies that nature provides them. Second, I maintain that Strauss thinks Nietzsche differs from the classical standard of nobility and opposes the classics on the nature of man: for Nietzsche there are no natural ends. Third, I argue that in Strauss's view Nietzsche decisively rejects citizen morality and justice, whereas Strauss regards them as beneficial and politically defensible because they point the way toward his higher standard of natural right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15367/com.v5i1.565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15367/com.v5i1.565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他关于施特劳斯的学术研究相反,本文认为施特劳斯认为自己已经果断地拒绝了尼采的思想。首先,我认为,尽管施特劳斯和尼采在批判现代文化、自由民主的缺陷和某些历史主义的缺陷上意见一致,但施特劳斯认为尼采无法从现代标准的陷阱中解脱出来。尼采的哲学需要自然标准,但他否认自然提供这些标准。第二,我认为施特劳斯认为尼采不同于古典的贵族标准,反对经典关于人的本质:对尼采来说,没有自然的目的。第三,我认为,在施特劳斯看来,尼采坚决反对公民道德和正义,而施特劳斯认为它们是有益的,在政治上是可辩护的,因为它们指向了他更高的自然权利标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modernity, Nobility, Morality
Contrary to other scholarship on Strauss, this paper argues that Strauss understands himself as having decisively rejected Nietzschean thought. First, I hold that notwithstanding the agreement between Strauss and Nietzsche on the critique of modern culture, the defects of liberal democracy, and the flaws in some kinds of historicism, Strauss sees Nietzsche as unable to extricate himself from the trap of modern standards. Nietzsche's philosophy needs natural standards, but he denies that nature provides them. Second, I maintain that Strauss thinks Nietzsche differs from the classical standard of nobility and opposes the classics on the nature of man: for Nietzsche there are no natural ends. Third, I argue that in Strauss's view Nietzsche decisively rejects citizen morality and justice, whereas Strauss regards them as beneficial and politically defensible because they point the way toward his higher standard of natural right.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Long established as the leading publication in its field, the journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics contains scholarly articles which both report original research on the politics of Commonwealth countries and relate their findings to issues of general significance for students of comparative politics. The journal also publishes work on the politics of other states where such work is of interest for comparative politics generally or where it enables comparisons to be made with Commonwealth countries.
期刊最新文献
Batman saves the Congo: how celebrities disrupt the politics of development Batman saves the Congo: how celebrities disrupt the politics of development , by Alexandra Cosima Budabin and Lisa Ann Richey, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 2021, xxviii + 301 pp., $27 (paperback), ISBN 9781517907594 Remembering African labor migration to the Second World: Socialist mobilities between Angola, Mozambique, and East Germany Remembering African labor migration to the Second World: Socialist mobilities between Angola, Mozambique, and East Germany , by Marcia Schenck, Springer, 2022, xxvii + 377, $49.99 (softcover), ISBN 9783031067785 Everyday state and democracy in Africa: ethnographic encounters Everyday state and democracy in Africa: ethnographic encounters , edited by Wale Adebanwi, Athens, Ohio, Ohio University Press, 2022, 427 pp., $39.95, ISBN 9780821424902 Patchwork Leviathan: pockets of bureaucratic effectiveness in developing states Patchwork Leviathan: pockets of bureaucratic effectiveness in developing states , by Erin Metz McDonnell, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2020, xvii + 290 pp., $115.00/£95.00 (hardback), ISBN 9780691197357 Churchill and India: manipulation or betrayal Churchill and India: manipulation or betrayal , by Kishan S. Rana, London, Routledge, 2023, xxii+192 pp., $136 (hardback), ISBN 9781032467399
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1