有和无冲击-边界层相互作用的超音速流动的多孔渗流边界条件

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1007/s10494-023-00464-9
Julian Giehler, Pierre Grenson, Reynald Bur
{"title":"有和无冲击-边界层相互作用的超音速流动的多孔渗流边界条件","authors":"Julian Giehler,&nbsp;Pierre Grenson,&nbsp;Reynald Bur","doi":"10.1007/s10494-023-00464-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper aims to evaluate the prediction accuracy of various porous bleed models on two flow cases of particular interest for supersonic applications: turbulent boundary layer bleeding and control of shock-boundary layer interactions. A thorough literature review was conducted to select the most relevant models. The models were then implemented as suction/blowing boundary conditions in the in-house compressible RANS solver <i>elsA</i> with a flexible approach based on source terms. Reference simulations with the holes considered in the computational domain were conducted in order to assess the models’ prediction capabilities. Two kinds of comparison were performed. In the first step, physical data (e.g., pressure, bleed mass flux) were extracted from the reference simulation and compared to the model predictions for the same conditions. In the second step, we performed RANS simulations using the various models as boundary conditions on a porous patch. Significant discrepancies between reference data and model predictions are highlighted, particularly for the bleed mass flux and velocity profiles, for which too high levels of momentum are predicted in the wall vicinity. This effect is supposedly attributed to the continuous application of transpiration over the patch. This has been shown to lead to an overestimation of the bleed effectiveness for the shock-boundary interaction flow case. In addition, reference simulations conducted in this study show that the diameter of the bleed holes influences the flow, which the existing porous bleed models do not consider. The outcome of this work, which highlights the deficiencies of state-of-the-art models, suggests the need to elaborate more advanced modeling for accurate prediction of both porous bleed performance and effect on the controlled flow.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Porous Bleed Boundary Conditions for Supersonic Flows With & Without Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction\",\"authors\":\"Julian Giehler,&nbsp;Pierre Grenson,&nbsp;Reynald Bur\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10494-023-00464-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper aims to evaluate the prediction accuracy of various porous bleed models on two flow cases of particular interest for supersonic applications: turbulent boundary layer bleeding and control of shock-boundary layer interactions. A thorough literature review was conducted to select the most relevant models. The models were then implemented as suction/blowing boundary conditions in the in-house compressible RANS solver <i>elsA</i> with a flexible approach based on source terms. Reference simulations with the holes considered in the computational domain were conducted in order to assess the models’ prediction capabilities. Two kinds of comparison were performed. In the first step, physical data (e.g., pressure, bleed mass flux) were extracted from the reference simulation and compared to the model predictions for the same conditions. In the second step, we performed RANS simulations using the various models as boundary conditions on a porous patch. Significant discrepancies between reference data and model predictions are highlighted, particularly for the bleed mass flux and velocity profiles, for which too high levels of momentum are predicted in the wall vicinity. This effect is supposedly attributed to the continuous application of transpiration over the patch. This has been shown to lead to an overestimation of the bleed effectiveness for the shock-boundary interaction flow case. In addition, reference simulations conducted in this study show that the diameter of the bleed holes influences the flow, which the existing porous bleed models do not consider. The outcome of this work, which highlights the deficiencies of state-of-the-art models, suggests the need to elaborate more advanced modeling for accurate prediction of both porous bleed performance and effect on the controlled flow.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-023-00464-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-023-00464-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在评估各种多孔渗流模型对超音速应用中两种流动情况的预测精度:湍流边界层渗流和冲击-边界层相互作用控制。本文对文献进行了全面梳理,以选出最相关的模型。然后,在内部可压缩 RANS 求解器 elsA 中以基于源项的灵活方法将这些模型作为吸气/吹气边界条件实施。为了评估模型的预测能力,对计算域中的孔洞进行了参考模拟。进行了两种比较。第一步,从参考模拟中提取物理数据(如压力、渗流质量通量),并与模型在相同条件下的预测结果进行比较。第二步,我们在多孔斑块上使用各种模型作为边界条件进行 RANS 模拟。结果表明,参考数据与模型预测之间存在明显差异,特别是在渗流质量通量和速度剖面上,预测壁面附近的动量水平过高。据推测,这种效应归因于补片上持续的蒸腾作用。这已被证明会导致高估冲击-边界相互作用流情况下的渗流效果。此外,本研究中进行的参考模拟显示,渗流孔的直径会影响流动,而现有的多孔渗流模型并未考虑这一点。这项工作的成果凸显了最先进模型的不足,表明有必要制定更先进的模型,以准确预测多孔渗水的性能和对受控流动的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Porous Bleed Boundary Conditions for Supersonic Flows With & Without Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction

This paper aims to evaluate the prediction accuracy of various porous bleed models on two flow cases of particular interest for supersonic applications: turbulent boundary layer bleeding and control of shock-boundary layer interactions. A thorough literature review was conducted to select the most relevant models. The models were then implemented as suction/blowing boundary conditions in the in-house compressible RANS solver elsA with a flexible approach based on source terms. Reference simulations with the holes considered in the computational domain were conducted in order to assess the models’ prediction capabilities. Two kinds of comparison were performed. In the first step, physical data (e.g., pressure, bleed mass flux) were extracted from the reference simulation and compared to the model predictions for the same conditions. In the second step, we performed RANS simulations using the various models as boundary conditions on a porous patch. Significant discrepancies between reference data and model predictions are highlighted, particularly for the bleed mass flux and velocity profiles, for which too high levels of momentum are predicted in the wall vicinity. This effect is supposedly attributed to the continuous application of transpiration over the patch. This has been shown to lead to an overestimation of the bleed effectiveness for the shock-boundary interaction flow case. In addition, reference simulations conducted in this study show that the diameter of the bleed holes influences the flow, which the existing porous bleed models do not consider. The outcome of this work, which highlights the deficiencies of state-of-the-art models, suggests the need to elaborate more advanced modeling for accurate prediction of both porous bleed performance and effect on the controlled flow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles. Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Averaging Effects in Adverse Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers LES of Biomass Syngas Combustion in a Swirl Stabilised Burner: Model Validation and Predictions A Comparison of Evaluation Methodologies of the Fractal Dimension of Premixed Turbulent Flames in 2D and 3D Using Direct Numerical Simulation Data Instability Modes and Scaling Analysis During Electro-Hydro-Dynamic-Atomization: Theoretical and Experimental Study Assessment of Wall Modeling With Adverse Pressure Gradient for High Reynolds Number Separated Flows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1