利用严格的油井完整性风险评估策略确定二氧化碳封存项目的长期命运

P. A. Patil, Asyraf M Hamimi, M. A. Bakar, D. Das, P. Tiwari, P. Chidambaram, M. A. B. A. Jalil
{"title":"利用严格的油井完整性风险评估策略确定二氧化碳封存项目的长期命运","authors":"P. A. Patil, Asyraf M Hamimi, M. A. Bakar, D. Das, P. Tiwari, P. Chidambaram, M. A. B. A. Jalil","doi":"10.4043/31463-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs are considered inherently safe for carbon sequestration, but high well density penetrating the CO2 storage reservoir could compromise the containment performance in a carbon, capture & sequestration (CCS) project. Based on the available well data, it is crucial to understand the age of the well, materials used for wellbore construction, cement quality, barriers performance, and well integrity. A risk management methodology can be incorporated to evaluate primary and secondary barriers in existing plugged and abandoned (P&A) and development wells to ensure long-term fate of CO2 sequestration project.\n Existing P&A wells and development wells in a depleted field were drilled 3–5 decades ago. The wellbore construction utilized non-corrosive resistant materials. Health of all wells that ever penetrated the CO2 storage reservoir need to be analyzed from long term perspective of storing CO2. Throughout the lifespan of wells, subsurface barriers should maintain hydraulic isolation to prevent leakage happening from subsurface to environment of reservoir fluids and injected CO2. Deterioration of strength of wellbore construction material due to corrosion, induced by downhole pressure and temperature conditions, should be considered. This study investigated 3 exploration and 21 development wells. Risk register was developed for each well describing causes and CO2 leakage risks, impacts and consequences. Metrics were defined for parameters such as well age, well head materials, wellhead functional test and leak test, sustained casing pressures for risk determination. Wells were risk rated individually based on the assessment. Wells with low risk can be utilized for well conversion. While for high-risk wells, an opportunity risk matrix was developed to mitigate risks in all the wells.\n This study evaluates the well integrity and CO2 leakage risk along the wells that penetrated the CO2 storage reservoir. The improved rigorous risk assessment exercise evaluates well barrier failure causes and impacts along with estimating the risk number per well. The well risk assessment score calculated was between 9.24 and 13.35 for 21 development wells. Out of these 21 wells, 4 wells with risk score <10 can be utilized for wells conversion. Specific barrier restoration process by additional scope of work such as lower completion removal including packer milling, intermediate casing removal, or installation of downhole permanent barriers with remedial cement is discussed for designing the well abandonment process to minimize leak potential of high-risk wells for ensuring long-term containment security.\n Improved rigorous well integrity risk assessment for CO2 storage field is decisive for any CCS project economics that utilizes barrier identification process and remedial actions.","PeriodicalId":11217,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining Long-Term Fate of a CO2 Sequestration Project Utilizing Rigorous Well Integrity Risk Assessment Strategy\",\"authors\":\"P. A. Patil, Asyraf M Hamimi, M. A. Bakar, D. Das, P. Tiwari, P. Chidambaram, M. A. B. A. Jalil\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/31463-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs are considered inherently safe for carbon sequestration, but high well density penetrating the CO2 storage reservoir could compromise the containment performance in a carbon, capture & sequestration (CCS) project. Based on the available well data, it is crucial to understand the age of the well, materials used for wellbore construction, cement quality, barriers performance, and well integrity. A risk management methodology can be incorporated to evaluate primary and secondary barriers in existing plugged and abandoned (P&A) and development wells to ensure long-term fate of CO2 sequestration project.\\n Existing P&A wells and development wells in a depleted field were drilled 3–5 decades ago. The wellbore construction utilized non-corrosive resistant materials. Health of all wells that ever penetrated the CO2 storage reservoir need to be analyzed from long term perspective of storing CO2. Throughout the lifespan of wells, subsurface barriers should maintain hydraulic isolation to prevent leakage happening from subsurface to environment of reservoir fluids and injected CO2. Deterioration of strength of wellbore construction material due to corrosion, induced by downhole pressure and temperature conditions, should be considered. This study investigated 3 exploration and 21 development wells. Risk register was developed for each well describing causes and CO2 leakage risks, impacts and consequences. Metrics were defined for parameters such as well age, well head materials, wellhead functional test and leak test, sustained casing pressures for risk determination. Wells were risk rated individually based on the assessment. Wells with low risk can be utilized for well conversion. While for high-risk wells, an opportunity risk matrix was developed to mitigate risks in all the wells.\\n This study evaluates the well integrity and CO2 leakage risk along the wells that penetrated the CO2 storage reservoir. The improved rigorous risk assessment exercise evaluates well barrier failure causes and impacts along with estimating the risk number per well. The well risk assessment score calculated was between 9.24 and 13.35 for 21 development wells. Out of these 21 wells, 4 wells with risk score <10 can be utilized for wells conversion. Specific barrier restoration process by additional scope of work such as lower completion removal including packer milling, intermediate casing removal, or installation of downhole permanent barriers with remedial cement is discussed for designing the well abandonment process to minimize leak potential of high-risk wells for ensuring long-term containment security.\\n Improved rigorous well integrity risk assessment for CO2 storage field is decisive for any CCS project economics that utilizes barrier identification process and remedial actions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/31463-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Fri, March 25, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/31463-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

枯竭的油气储层被认为对碳封存是安全的,但在碳捕获与封存(CCS)项目中,穿透二氧化碳储层的高密度井可能会影响封存性能。根据现有的井数据,了解井龄、井眼施工材料、水泥质量、屏障性能和井完整性至关重要。风险管理方法可用于评估现有封堵弃井(P&A)和开发井的主要和次要障碍,以确保二氧化碳封存项目的长期命运。废弃油田现有的弃井和开发井是在30 - 50年前钻的。井筒施工采用了非腐蚀性材料。需要从储存二氧化碳的长期角度分析所有穿透过二氧化碳储层的井的健康状况。在井的整个生命周期中,地下屏障应保持水力隔离,以防止油藏流体和注入的二氧化碳从地下泄漏到环境中。应考虑井下压力和温度条件引起的腐蚀对井筒施工材料强度的影响。本研究调查了3口勘探井和21口开发井。为每口井开发了风险登记册,描述了原因和二氧化碳泄漏风险、影响和后果。针对井龄、井口材料、井口功能测试和泄漏测试、持续套管压力等参数定义了指标,以确定风险。根据评估结果对井进行了风险评级。低风险井可以进行井转换。而对于高风险井,开发了机会风险矩阵来降低所有井的风险。本研究评估了穿过CO2储层的井的完整性和CO2泄漏风险。改进后的严格风险评估方法可以评估井眼屏障失效的原因和影响,并估计每口井的风险数量。21口开发井的风险评价评分在9.24 ~ 13.35之间。在21口井中,有4口风险评分<10的井可以进行改造。在设计弃井工艺时,讨论了通过额外的工作范围(如下部完井拆除,包括封隔器磨铣、中间套管拆除或使用修复水泥安装井下永久屏障)来实现特定的屏障修复过程,以最大限度地减少高风险井的泄漏可能性,从而确保长期的密封安全。对于利用障碍识别过程和补救措施的任何CCS项目来说,提高严格的油井完整性风险评估对二氧化碳封存领域的经济效益都是决定性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determining Long-Term Fate of a CO2 Sequestration Project Utilizing Rigorous Well Integrity Risk Assessment Strategy
Depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs are considered inherently safe for carbon sequestration, but high well density penetrating the CO2 storage reservoir could compromise the containment performance in a carbon, capture & sequestration (CCS) project. Based on the available well data, it is crucial to understand the age of the well, materials used for wellbore construction, cement quality, barriers performance, and well integrity. A risk management methodology can be incorporated to evaluate primary and secondary barriers in existing plugged and abandoned (P&A) and development wells to ensure long-term fate of CO2 sequestration project. Existing P&A wells and development wells in a depleted field were drilled 3–5 decades ago. The wellbore construction utilized non-corrosive resistant materials. Health of all wells that ever penetrated the CO2 storage reservoir need to be analyzed from long term perspective of storing CO2. Throughout the lifespan of wells, subsurface barriers should maintain hydraulic isolation to prevent leakage happening from subsurface to environment of reservoir fluids and injected CO2. Deterioration of strength of wellbore construction material due to corrosion, induced by downhole pressure and temperature conditions, should be considered. This study investigated 3 exploration and 21 development wells. Risk register was developed for each well describing causes and CO2 leakage risks, impacts and consequences. Metrics were defined for parameters such as well age, well head materials, wellhead functional test and leak test, sustained casing pressures for risk determination. Wells were risk rated individually based on the assessment. Wells with low risk can be utilized for well conversion. While for high-risk wells, an opportunity risk matrix was developed to mitigate risks in all the wells. This study evaluates the well integrity and CO2 leakage risk along the wells that penetrated the CO2 storage reservoir. The improved rigorous risk assessment exercise evaluates well barrier failure causes and impacts along with estimating the risk number per well. The well risk assessment score calculated was between 9.24 and 13.35 for 21 development wells. Out of these 21 wells, 4 wells with risk score <10 can be utilized for wells conversion. Specific barrier restoration process by additional scope of work such as lower completion removal including packer milling, intermediate casing removal, or installation of downhole permanent barriers with remedial cement is discussed for designing the well abandonment process to minimize leak potential of high-risk wells for ensuring long-term containment security. Improved rigorous well integrity risk assessment for CO2 storage field is decisive for any CCS project economics that utilizes barrier identification process and remedial actions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost Effective Framework of Integrated Development of Offshore Marginal Oilfields - Case Study of a Heavy Oil Reservoir with Thin Layers An Experimental Investigation into the Potential of a Green Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer Formulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Sandstone Reservoir World's First Arsenic in Condensate Removal for Oil & Gas Industry and its Universal Applications for Adsorption Facilities Digital Well Construction with Mud Motor Applications Coreflooding Experiments on PAM/PEI Polymer Gel for Water Control in High-Temperature and High-Pressure Conditions: With and Without Crossflow Effect
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1