数字杂草管理——甜菜杂草评分的新趋势

IF 0.2 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Sugar Industry-Zuckerindustrie Pub Date : 2022-06-16 DOI:10.36961/si28804
René Hans-Jürgen Heim, Sebastian Streit, Dirk Koops, M. Kuska, S. Paulus
{"title":"数字杂草管理——甜菜杂草评分的新趋势","authors":"René Hans-Jürgen Heim, Sebastian Streit, Dirk Koops, M. Kuska, S. Paulus","doi":"10.36961/si28804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weed scoring is crucial to test the efficacy of herbicides and other weed management methods but has proven to be labor intense and variable across scoring individuals and time. This article provides a comparison of new approaches of weed scoring based on digital tools to conventional visual scoring. The first method collected aerial imagery that was then scored manually on a computer screen. The second method is a machine learning approach, automatically detecting and counting weeds in aerial imagery. The reference method is a conventional visual scoring by human raters. Across all scoring methods, the results show similar patterns, but the total number of scored plants differs. In comparison to the digital approaches, in field scoring by human raters estimated a higher weed infestation. Possible reasons for this, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed to explore new modes of weed scoring. A clear benefit of digital scoring is the potential to automate the procedure and its objective, repeatable nature.","PeriodicalId":54362,"journal":{"name":"Sugar Industry-Zuckerindustrie","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital weed management – New trends for weed scoring in sugar beet\",\"authors\":\"René Hans-Jürgen Heim, Sebastian Streit, Dirk Koops, M. Kuska, S. Paulus\",\"doi\":\"10.36961/si28804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Weed scoring is crucial to test the efficacy of herbicides and other weed management methods but has proven to be labor intense and variable across scoring individuals and time. This article provides a comparison of new approaches of weed scoring based on digital tools to conventional visual scoring. The first method collected aerial imagery that was then scored manually on a computer screen. The second method is a machine learning approach, automatically detecting and counting weeds in aerial imagery. The reference method is a conventional visual scoring by human raters. Across all scoring methods, the results show similar patterns, but the total number of scored plants differs. In comparison to the digital approaches, in field scoring by human raters estimated a higher weed infestation. Possible reasons for this, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed to explore new modes of weed scoring. A clear benefit of digital scoring is the potential to automate the procedure and its objective, repeatable nature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sugar Industry-Zuckerindustrie\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sugar Industry-Zuckerindustrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36961/si28804\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sugar Industry-Zuckerindustrie","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36961/si28804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

杂草评分对于测试除草剂和其他杂草管理方法的有效性至关重要,但已被证明是劳动密集型的,并且在评分个体和时间上是可变的。本文提供了一种基于数字工具和传统视觉评分的杂草评分新方法的比较。第一种方法是收集航空图像,然后在电脑屏幕上手动打分。第二种方法是机器学习方法,自动检测和计数航空图像中的杂草。参考方法是由人类评分员进行传统的视觉评分。在所有的评分方法中,结果显示出相似的模式,但被评分植物的总数不同。与数字方法相比,人工评分的现场评分估计了更高的杂草侵扰。讨论了可能的原因,以及每种方法的优缺点,以探索杂草评分的新模式。数字评分的一个明显好处是,它有可能使整个过程自动化,并具有客观、可重复的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital weed management – New trends for weed scoring in sugar beet
Weed scoring is crucial to test the efficacy of herbicides and other weed management methods but has proven to be labor intense and variable across scoring individuals and time. This article provides a comparison of new approaches of weed scoring based on digital tools to conventional visual scoring. The first method collected aerial imagery that was then scored manually on a computer screen. The second method is a machine learning approach, automatically detecting and counting weeds in aerial imagery. The reference method is a conventional visual scoring by human raters. Across all scoring methods, the results show similar patterns, but the total number of scored plants differs. In comparison to the digital approaches, in field scoring by human raters estimated a higher weed infestation. Possible reasons for this, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each method are discussed to explore new modes of weed scoring. A clear benefit of digital scoring is the potential to automate the procedure and its objective, repeatable nature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sugar Industry-Zuckerindustrie
Sugar Industry-Zuckerindustrie 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Sugar Industry / Zuckerindustrie accepts original papers (research reports), review articles, and short communications on all the aspects implied by the journals title and subtitle.
期刊最新文献
Optimal application of dextranase in a Louisiana sugarcane factory to mitigate severe processing problems after a freeze Impact of sugar beet texture during processing Advancing cane-quality management in the South African smallholder-farmer sector through participatory on-farm demonstration and knowledge exchange Design of an automated electro-mechanical shredder-grid-door positioner for online setting adjustments Effect of dew and spray volume on the efficacy of control of asulam on fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1