{"title":"印度中部钱德拉普尔地区地下水铁浓度测定的两种分析方法比较","authors":"R. Kamble","doi":"10.12983/IJSRES-2015-P0129-0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Water is an indispensible part of human life. Groundwater is contributing significantly as a source of drinking, cooking and domestic purposes. Groundwater contains different heavy metals and iron is one of the dominating one. Chronic exposure of iron through groundwater consumption above WHO drinking water standard of 0.3 mg/L has well understood. To ascertain the impacts of groundwater iron on human health its accurate measurement is an essential aspect. A research has been carried out to compare two analytical methods: ICP method (ICP-OES Dv 7000) and Aquaquant Iron Analysis Kit Merck, range 0.25-15 mg/L, Germany (visual method). Total 36 groundwater samples in Chandrapur district of Central India were assessed for post monsoon season of 2013 (October) for iron concentration by these two analytical methods. Findings of the study suggested that ICP method gives more accurate results in a wide range of iron concentration under field conditions as compared with Aquaquant Iron Analysis Kit. At 0.0-1.0 mg/L of Fe results obtained by both these method were in accordance with each other. At 1.0-2.0 mg/L of Fe, ICP gave slight increased in concentration as compared with test kit. However, at 5.0 mg/L of Fe by test kit, results obtained by ICP method was significantly lower.","PeriodicalId":14383,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences","volume":"8 1","pages":"129-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Two Analytical Methods for Measurement of Iron Concentration in Groundwater in Chandrapur District, Central India\",\"authors\":\"R. Kamble\",\"doi\":\"10.12983/IJSRES-2015-P0129-0136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Water is an indispensible part of human life. Groundwater is contributing significantly as a source of drinking, cooking and domestic purposes. Groundwater contains different heavy metals and iron is one of the dominating one. Chronic exposure of iron through groundwater consumption above WHO drinking water standard of 0.3 mg/L has well understood. To ascertain the impacts of groundwater iron on human health its accurate measurement is an essential aspect. A research has been carried out to compare two analytical methods: ICP method (ICP-OES Dv 7000) and Aquaquant Iron Analysis Kit Merck, range 0.25-15 mg/L, Germany (visual method). Total 36 groundwater samples in Chandrapur district of Central India were assessed for post monsoon season of 2013 (October) for iron concentration by these two analytical methods. Findings of the study suggested that ICP method gives more accurate results in a wide range of iron concentration under field conditions as compared with Aquaquant Iron Analysis Kit. At 0.0-1.0 mg/L of Fe results obtained by both these method were in accordance with each other. At 1.0-2.0 mg/L of Fe, ICP gave slight increased in concentration as compared with test kit. However, at 5.0 mg/L of Fe by test kit, results obtained by ICP method was significantly lower.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"129-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12983/IJSRES-2015-P0129-0136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12983/IJSRES-2015-P0129-0136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
水是人类生活不可缺少的一部分。地下水作为饮用、烹饪和家庭用途的来源发挥着重要作用。地下水中含有多种重金属,铁是主要的重金属之一。通过饮用超过世卫组织饮用水标准0.3毫克/升的地下水而长期接触铁已得到充分了解。确定地下水铁对人体健康的影响,其准确测量是一个重要方面。比较了两种分析方法:ICP法(ICP- oes Dv 7000)和Aquaquant Iron Analysis Kit Merck,范围0.25-15 mg/L,德国(目测法)。采用这两种分析方法对2013年季风季节后(10月)印度中部Chandrapur地区的36份地下水样品进行了铁浓度评估。研究结果表明,与Aquaquant iron Analysis Kit相比,ICP方法在现场条件下的铁浓度范围更广,结果更准确。在铁浓度为0.0 ~ 1.0 mg/L时,两种方法的测定结果基本一致。在1.0 ~ 2.0 mg/L Fe时,ICP浓度较试剂盒略有升高。而当检测试剂盒中Fe浓度为5.0 mg/L时,ICP法得到的结果明显较低。
Comparison of Two Analytical Methods for Measurement of Iron Concentration in Groundwater in Chandrapur District, Central India
Water is an indispensible part of human life. Groundwater is contributing significantly as a source of drinking, cooking and domestic purposes. Groundwater contains different heavy metals and iron is one of the dominating one. Chronic exposure of iron through groundwater consumption above WHO drinking water standard of 0.3 mg/L has well understood. To ascertain the impacts of groundwater iron on human health its accurate measurement is an essential aspect. A research has been carried out to compare two analytical methods: ICP method (ICP-OES Dv 7000) and Aquaquant Iron Analysis Kit Merck, range 0.25-15 mg/L, Germany (visual method). Total 36 groundwater samples in Chandrapur district of Central India were assessed for post monsoon season of 2013 (October) for iron concentration by these two analytical methods. Findings of the study suggested that ICP method gives more accurate results in a wide range of iron concentration under field conditions as compared with Aquaquant Iron Analysis Kit. At 0.0-1.0 mg/L of Fe results obtained by both these method were in accordance with each other. At 1.0-2.0 mg/L of Fe, ICP gave slight increased in concentration as compared with test kit. However, at 5.0 mg/L of Fe by test kit, results obtained by ICP method was significantly lower.