不同拥塞控制机制的共存研究

Mario Hock, R. Bless, M. Zitterbart
{"title":"不同拥塞控制机制的共存研究","authors":"Mario Hock, R. Bless, M. Zitterbart","doi":"10.1109/LCN.2016.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interactive and delay-sensitive applications constitute an important and growing part of the Internet. Today, low delays can only be achieved if there are no congested links along the path. At a bottleneck, the commonly used congestion control mechanisms induce high queuing delay and packet loss. Specialized congestion control mechanisms achieving a low queuing delay in an otherwise congested network exist. However, if their flows share a bottleneck with traditionally congestion controlled flows, they get suppressed or loose their low-delay property. This paper presents three approaches - Separate Paths, Separate Queues and Limited Queue - that enable coexistence of congestion control mechanisms that are optimized for different goals, e.g., interactive applications and bulk transfers. The measurement results show that concurrent operation of different congestion control mechanisms can be successfully implemented this way.","PeriodicalId":6864,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","volume":"16 1","pages":"567-570"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Coexistence of Different Congestion Control Mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Mario Hock, R. Bless, M. Zitterbart\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LCN.2016.94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interactive and delay-sensitive applications constitute an important and growing part of the Internet. Today, low delays can only be achieved if there are no congested links along the path. At a bottleneck, the commonly used congestion control mechanisms induce high queuing delay and packet loss. Specialized congestion control mechanisms achieving a low queuing delay in an otherwise congested network exist. However, if their flows share a bottleneck with traditionally congestion controlled flows, they get suppressed or loose their low-delay property. This paper presents three approaches - Separate Paths, Separate Queues and Limited Queue - that enable coexistence of congestion control mechanisms that are optimized for different goals, e.g., interactive applications and bulk transfers. The measurement results show that concurrent operation of different congestion control mechanisms can be successfully implemented this way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"567-570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2016.94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 41st Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LCN.2016.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

交互式和对延迟敏感的应用程序构成了Internet中一个重要且不断增长的部分。今天,只有在路径沿线没有拥堵的情况下,才能实现低延迟。在瓶颈处,常用的拥塞控制机制会导致高排队延迟和丢包。存在专门的拥塞控制机制,可以在其他拥塞网络中实现低排队延迟。然而,如果它们的流与传统的拥塞控制流共享一个瓶颈,它们就会被抑制或失去其低延迟特性。本文提出了三种方法——分离路径、分离队列和有限队列——它们使针对不同目标优化的拥塞控制机制共存,例如,交互式应用程序和批量传输。测试结果表明,这种方法可以成功地实现不同拥塞控制机制的并发操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward Coexistence of Different Congestion Control Mechanisms
Interactive and delay-sensitive applications constitute an important and growing part of the Internet. Today, low delays can only be achieved if there are no congested links along the path. At a bottleneck, the commonly used congestion control mechanisms induce high queuing delay and packet loss. Specialized congestion control mechanisms achieving a low queuing delay in an otherwise congested network exist. However, if their flows share a bottleneck with traditionally congestion controlled flows, they get suppressed or loose their low-delay property. This paper presents three approaches - Separate Paths, Separate Queues and Limited Queue - that enable coexistence of congestion control mechanisms that are optimized for different goals, e.g., interactive applications and bulk transfers. The measurement results show that concurrent operation of different congestion control mechanisms can be successfully implemented this way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Message from the General Chair Message from the general chair Best of Both Worlds: Prioritizing Network Coding without Increased Space Complexity Controlling Network Latency in Mixed Hadoop Clusters: Do We Need Active Queue Management? TransFetch: A Viewing Behavior Driven Video Distribution Framework in Public Transport
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1