风险和错误定价如何导致异常?

Yuan Li
{"title":"风险和错误定价如何导致异常?","authors":"Yuan Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3642792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study quantifies the contributions of risk and mispricing to a comprehensive set of anomalies identified in the literature. Overall, risk and mispricing contribute equally to these anomalies; however, there is a wide variation across different categories. Mispricing is solely responsible for momentum anomalies, whereas risk is solely responsible for anomalies associated with accounting-to-market ratios. Profitability and investment anomalies are due to both risk and mispricing, while other anomalies based on information from financial statements and the stock market are mainly due to mispricing. The study highlights the importance of considering risk and mispricing together in asset-pricing research, especially when the two causes are likely to have opposite effects, as in the case of anomalies relating to financial distress and constraints.","PeriodicalId":11410,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Risk and Mispricing Contribute to Anomalies?\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3642792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study quantifies the contributions of risk and mispricing to a comprehensive set of anomalies identified in the literature. Overall, risk and mispricing contribute equally to these anomalies; however, there is a wide variation across different categories. Mispricing is solely responsible for momentum anomalies, whereas risk is solely responsible for anomalies associated with accounting-to-market ratios. Profitability and investment anomalies are due to both risk and mispricing, while other anomalies based on information from financial statements and the stock market are mainly due to mispricing. The study highlights the importance of considering risk and mispricing together in asset-pricing research, especially when the two causes are likely to have opposite effects, as in the case of anomalies relating to financial distress and constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3642792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Risk eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3642792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究量化了风险和错误定价对文献中发现的一组全面异常的贡献。总体而言,风险和错误定价同样导致了这些异常现象;然而,不同类别之间的差异很大。错误定价是动量异常的唯一原因,而风险是与会计与市场比率相关的异常的唯一原因。盈利能力和投资异常是由于风险和错误定价,而基于财务报表和股票市场信息的其他异常主要是由于错误定价。该研究强调了在资产定价研究中同时考虑风险和错误定价的重要性,特别是当这两个原因可能产生相反的影响时,例如与金融困境和约束有关的异常情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Do Risk and Mispricing Contribute to Anomalies?
This study quantifies the contributions of risk and mispricing to a comprehensive set of anomalies identified in the literature. Overall, risk and mispricing contribute equally to these anomalies; however, there is a wide variation across different categories. Mispricing is solely responsible for momentum anomalies, whereas risk is solely responsible for anomalies associated with accounting-to-market ratios. Profitability and investment anomalies are due to both risk and mispricing, while other anomalies based on information from financial statements and the stock market are mainly due to mispricing. The study highlights the importance of considering risk and mispricing together in asset-pricing research, especially when the two causes are likely to have opposite effects, as in the case of anomalies relating to financial distress and constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corporate Loan Spreads and Economic Activity The Effect of Internal and External Factors on Credit Risk : A Study on Shawbrook Bank Limited in United Kingdom Systemic Risk in Interbank Networks: Disentangling Balance Sheets and Network Effects Credit & Lending Decisions Assessment Report on Ramsay Health Care Identifying the Information Polarities in Credit Risk Transfer Instruments; A Case for Regulatory Product Intervention and Product Liability Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1