{"title":"在传统医疗中使用管理式医疗工具——我们应该这样做吗?我们可以吗?","authors":"R. Berenson, D. Harris","doi":"10.2307/1192282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the early 1990s, policy analysts seeking important opportunities for reform in the Medicare program have looked at the experience of private markets and managed care in the private sector. Managed care organizations (“MCOs”), in general, and health maintenance organizations (“HMOs”), in particular, seem to have hit the wall in recent years in their ability to contain costs. They have experienced a public backlash against many of their policies and procedures, resulting in marketplace, legislative, and legal reactions that have altered their operations. Nevertheless, many policy analysts continue to look to managed care and competition among private health plans as the bases for structural reform of Medicare. Proponents of market forces in health care often advocate both managed care and managed competition, but, although related, the concepts are quite different. For purposes of this discussion, we apply the term “managed care” to supply-side interventions meant to affect directly the efficiency and quality of health services delivery. In contrast, “managed competition” attempts to alter individuals’ demand for care among competing private insurers, thereby affecting provider behavior only indirectly.","PeriodicalId":39484,"journal":{"name":"Law and Contemporary Problems","volume":"95 1","pages":"139-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Managed Care Tools in Traditional Medicare — Should We? Could We?\",\"authors\":\"R. Berenson, D. Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1192282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the early 1990s, policy analysts seeking important opportunities for reform in the Medicare program have looked at the experience of private markets and managed care in the private sector. Managed care organizations (“MCOs”), in general, and health maintenance organizations (“HMOs”), in particular, seem to have hit the wall in recent years in their ability to contain costs. They have experienced a public backlash against many of their policies and procedures, resulting in marketplace, legislative, and legal reactions that have altered their operations. Nevertheless, many policy analysts continue to look to managed care and competition among private health plans as the bases for structural reform of Medicare. Proponents of market forces in health care often advocate both managed care and managed competition, but, although related, the concepts are quite different. For purposes of this discussion, we apply the term “managed care” to supply-side interventions meant to affect directly the efficiency and quality of health services delivery. In contrast, “managed competition” attempts to alter individuals’ demand for care among competing private insurers, thereby affecting provider behavior only indirectly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law and Contemporary Problems\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"139-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law and Contemporary Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1192282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Contemporary Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1192282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using Managed Care Tools in Traditional Medicare — Should We? Could We?
Since the early 1990s, policy analysts seeking important opportunities for reform in the Medicare program have looked at the experience of private markets and managed care in the private sector. Managed care organizations (“MCOs”), in general, and health maintenance organizations (“HMOs”), in particular, seem to have hit the wall in recent years in their ability to contain costs. They have experienced a public backlash against many of their policies and procedures, resulting in marketplace, legislative, and legal reactions that have altered their operations. Nevertheless, many policy analysts continue to look to managed care and competition among private health plans as the bases for structural reform of Medicare. Proponents of market forces in health care often advocate both managed care and managed competition, but, although related, the concepts are quite different. For purposes of this discussion, we apply the term “managed care” to supply-side interventions meant to affect directly the efficiency and quality of health services delivery. In contrast, “managed competition” attempts to alter individuals’ demand for care among competing private insurers, thereby affecting provider behavior only indirectly.
期刊介绍:
Law and Contemporary Problems was founded in 1933 and is the oldest journal published at Duke Law School. It is a quarterly, interdisciplinary, faculty-edited publication of Duke Law School. L&CP recognizes that many fields in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities can enhance the development and understanding of law. It is our purpose to seek out these areas of overlap and to publish balanced symposia that enlighten not just legal readers, but readers from these other disciplines as well. L&CP uses a symposium format, generally publishing one symposium per issue on a topic of contemporary concern. Authors and articles are selected to ensure that each issue collectively creates a unified presentation of the contemporary problem under consideration. L&CP hosts an annual conference at Duke Law School featuring the authors of one of the year’s four symposia.