新的可能性:扩展体育教练的研究和实践

IF 2.7 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Sports Coaching Review Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1080/21640629.2021.1990657
N. Barker-Ruchti, L. Purdy
{"title":"新的可能性:扩展体育教练的研究和实践","authors":"N. Barker-Ruchti, L. Purdy","doi":"10.1080/21640629.2021.1990657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An overarching aim of Sports Coaching Review is to develop a critical body of knowledge on issues related to sports coaching theory and practice. There is no doubt that since its first volume in August 2012, the journal’s contributions have generated considerable and important socio-cultural knowledge that has significantly influenced the establishment of the sports coaching field and profession. Yet, a scientific field requires continued development to remain state-of-the-art and all scientific fields require clear conceptual foundations. If not, a body of knowledge risks to lose its actuality, and with that its relevance and legitimacy. Hence, continued development is important, such as in the form of considerations of discussions from outside of a respective field, to enable researchers to “alter [their] metaphors and gestalts in ways that challenge the underlying rationales supporting accepted theories” (Whetten, 1989, p. 493); or in the form of bringing in experts from outside of a particular scientific community (or profession), scholars who are on the outside or fringe of a discipline and who see “things” differently (Savory, 2020). This special issue sets out to provide possibilities and prospects and stimulate debate and discussion to offer new insights relating to the field of sports coaching. It presents the thinking of a select group of authors, whose scholarship has gained momentum in other fields. We believe that their theorising and the arguments they put forward can create possibilities for new thinking in sports coaching research. Consequently, this special issue attempts to transcend some disciplinary boundaries and highlight (new) conceptual frameworks and methodological possibilities which, we hope, will be useful in igniting ideas amongst scholars to “think with [their] own head[s]” (Schopenhauer, 2015). We would like to briefly acknowledge the procedure that has led to the six contributions included in the special issue. Our initial strategy to inspire the sports coaching discourse was to identify arguments that we knew of that could be of interest to scholars in the field of sports coaching. This approach was largely influenced by who we knew and what research these scholars were conducting. Based on this network, and considering the spatial limitations of a SCR issue, we approached nine scholars (or scholarly teams) from various parts of the world, of which six articles have now come to fruition. SPORTS COACHING REVIEW 2022, VOL. 11, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1990657","PeriodicalId":43190,"journal":{"name":"Sports Coaching Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New possibilities: extending research and practice in sports coaching\",\"authors\":\"N. Barker-Ruchti, L. Purdy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21640629.2021.1990657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An overarching aim of Sports Coaching Review is to develop a critical body of knowledge on issues related to sports coaching theory and practice. There is no doubt that since its first volume in August 2012, the journal’s contributions have generated considerable and important socio-cultural knowledge that has significantly influenced the establishment of the sports coaching field and profession. Yet, a scientific field requires continued development to remain state-of-the-art and all scientific fields require clear conceptual foundations. If not, a body of knowledge risks to lose its actuality, and with that its relevance and legitimacy. Hence, continued development is important, such as in the form of considerations of discussions from outside of a respective field, to enable researchers to “alter [their] metaphors and gestalts in ways that challenge the underlying rationales supporting accepted theories” (Whetten, 1989, p. 493); or in the form of bringing in experts from outside of a particular scientific community (or profession), scholars who are on the outside or fringe of a discipline and who see “things” differently (Savory, 2020). This special issue sets out to provide possibilities and prospects and stimulate debate and discussion to offer new insights relating to the field of sports coaching. It presents the thinking of a select group of authors, whose scholarship has gained momentum in other fields. We believe that their theorising and the arguments they put forward can create possibilities for new thinking in sports coaching research. Consequently, this special issue attempts to transcend some disciplinary boundaries and highlight (new) conceptual frameworks and methodological possibilities which, we hope, will be useful in igniting ideas amongst scholars to “think with [their] own head[s]” (Schopenhauer, 2015). We would like to briefly acknowledge the procedure that has led to the six contributions included in the special issue. Our initial strategy to inspire the sports coaching discourse was to identify arguments that we knew of that could be of interest to scholars in the field of sports coaching. This approach was largely influenced by who we knew and what research these scholars were conducting. Based on this network, and considering the spatial limitations of a SCR issue, we approached nine scholars (or scholarly teams) from various parts of the world, of which six articles have now come to fruition. SPORTS COACHING REVIEW 2022, VOL. 11, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1990657\",\"PeriodicalId\":43190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Coaching Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Coaching Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1990657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Coaching Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1990657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《体育教练评论》的首要目标是在与体育教练理论和实践相关的问题上建立一个重要的知识体系。毫无疑问,自2012年8月出版第一卷以来,该杂志的贡献产生了相当多的重要社会文化知识,对体育教练领域和职业的建立产生了重大影响。然而,一个科学领域需要不断发展以保持最先进的水平,所有科学领域都需要明确的概念基础。否则,知识体系就有可能失去其现实性,并随之失去其相关性和合法性。因此,持续发展是很重要的,例如以考虑来自各自领域之外的讨论的形式,使研究人员能够“以挑战支持公认理论的基本原理的方式改变[他们的]隐喻和格式塔”(惠滕,1989,第493页);或者以从特定科学界(或专业)之外引入专家的形式,即在学科之外或边缘的学者,他们以不同的方式看待“事物”(Savory, 2020)。这期特刊旨在提供可能性和前景,并激发辩论和讨论,以提供与体育教练领域相关的新见解。它展示了一组精选的作者的思想,他们的学术在其他领域获得了动力。我们相信,他们的理论和他们提出的论点可以为体育教练研究的新思路创造可能性。因此,本期特刊试图超越一些学科界限,突出(新的)概念框架和方法论的可能性,我们希望,这将有助于激发学者们“用自己的头脑思考”的想法(叔本华,2015)。我们要简要地感谢导致本期特刊所载六篇文章的程序。我们激发运动教练话语的最初策略是确定我们所知道的可能引起运动教练领域学者兴趣的论点。这种方法很大程度上受到我们认识的人以及这些学者正在进行的研究的影响。基于这个网络,并考虑到SCR问题的空间限制,我们联系了来自世界各地的9位学者(或学术团队),其中6篇文章现已取得成果。体育教练评论2022,第11卷,第11期。1,1 - 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1990657
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New possibilities: extending research and practice in sports coaching
An overarching aim of Sports Coaching Review is to develop a critical body of knowledge on issues related to sports coaching theory and practice. There is no doubt that since its first volume in August 2012, the journal’s contributions have generated considerable and important socio-cultural knowledge that has significantly influenced the establishment of the sports coaching field and profession. Yet, a scientific field requires continued development to remain state-of-the-art and all scientific fields require clear conceptual foundations. If not, a body of knowledge risks to lose its actuality, and with that its relevance and legitimacy. Hence, continued development is important, such as in the form of considerations of discussions from outside of a respective field, to enable researchers to “alter [their] metaphors and gestalts in ways that challenge the underlying rationales supporting accepted theories” (Whetten, 1989, p. 493); or in the form of bringing in experts from outside of a particular scientific community (or profession), scholars who are on the outside or fringe of a discipline and who see “things” differently (Savory, 2020). This special issue sets out to provide possibilities and prospects and stimulate debate and discussion to offer new insights relating to the field of sports coaching. It presents the thinking of a select group of authors, whose scholarship has gained momentum in other fields. We believe that their theorising and the arguments they put forward can create possibilities for new thinking in sports coaching research. Consequently, this special issue attempts to transcend some disciplinary boundaries and highlight (new) conceptual frameworks and methodological possibilities which, we hope, will be useful in igniting ideas amongst scholars to “think with [their] own head[s]” (Schopenhauer, 2015). We would like to briefly acknowledge the procedure that has led to the six contributions included in the special issue. Our initial strategy to inspire the sports coaching discourse was to identify arguments that we knew of that could be of interest to scholars in the field of sports coaching. This approach was largely influenced by who we knew and what research these scholars were conducting. Based on this network, and considering the spatial limitations of a SCR issue, we approached nine scholars (or scholarly teams) from various parts of the world, of which six articles have now come to fruition. SPORTS COACHING REVIEW 2022, VOL. 11, NO. 1, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2021.1990657
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Coaching Review
Sports Coaching Review HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
19.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Coach development as assemblage: mobilising assemblage thinking to examine coach learning within an endurance-running coach development intravention Adding texture to the Art of constraints-led coaching: a request for more research-informed guidelines “You can stay now, you are trusted”: navigating qualitative fieldwork in sport coaching Sport pedagogy in played-form practice in soccer: the articulation between contents and contexts Exhausted by design: coaching, care, and sleep in the NCAA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1