采用初始全身治疗对局部晚期结膜黑色素瘤的有效保守治疗

Hassan Hassan, R. Epstein, S. Cherepanoff, R. Conway
{"title":"采用初始全身治疗对局部晚期结膜黑色素瘤的有效保守治疗","authors":"Hassan Hassan, R. Epstein, S. Cherepanoff, R. Conway","doi":"10.1111/ceo.13691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conjunctival melanoma (CM) comprises 2% to 5% of all ocular tumours, and 5% to 7% of ocular melanomas. The annual incidence of CM is 0.2 to 0.8 per million amongst Caucasians, in which population the usual age range of presentation is 55 to 65 years. The standard of care for the initial management of localized CM is no-touch surgical excision with a minimum 2 to 4 mm margin. Locally advanced disease involving orbit invasion is more challenging to manage and has traditionally been regarded as an indication for radical curative-intent surgery (orbital exenteration). Here we report a case of locally advanced and recurrent CM that has been managed successfully for the last 3.5 years using systemic targeted therapy. A 53-year-old Caucasian male presented in January 2016 to the ocular oncology unit with a biopsy confirming locally advanced CM (AJCC stage T3B) of the right eye invading the anterior orbit and upper tarsal plate. The tumour had been excised in December 2015. Visual acuities were 6/7.5 and 6/6 in the right and left eye, respectively. Staging investigations including fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography scanning revealed no metastatic disease. Mutation testing (Ion Torrent Ampliseq Cancer Gene Panel v2.0) of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue confirmed a classical BRAF (V600E) mutation. During the multidisciplinary discussion, three aspects of the patient's own preferences were identified: first, ocular removal may affect his employment as a licensed occupational operator of heavy equipment; second, satisfactory binocular vision as an enthusiastic recreational cricket player; and third, importance of normal cosmesis for lifestyle reasons. On the other hand, it was explained to the patient that surgical exenteration could well represent the only plausible curative intervention. Against that reasoning, however, it was also conceded that even proceeding to exenteration would not guarantee a cure, since subsequent locoregional and/or metastatic recurrence remained a possibility. After informed discussion and consent, the patient was offered initial management using systemic therapy targeting V600E-mutant BRAF, consisting of dabrafenib and trametinib. Patient understood that the provisional plan would be for substitution of immunotherapy (eg, anti-PD1 plus ipilimumab) with the aim of achieving a further period of long-term control, albeit not necessarily a cure. The possibility of using initial immunotherapy was also discussed, though it was pointed out that a rapid initial tumour shrinkage might be more reliably achieved using mutation-targeting kinase inhibitors, and hence this approach was chosen. Fortunately, a complete clinical and radiologic remission of disease was evident by April 2016 (Figure 1A,B). From May 2016, the clinical course was complicated by drug-related fever and abnormal liver function tests, which was at first managed with a combination of treatment delay, dose reduction, and/or steroid cover. A small recurrence on the upper lid was resected during this period, and histopathology confirmed CM recurrence (Figure 1C). By early 2017, persistent fevers and liver function abnormalities triggered a switch to vemurafenib and cobimetinib, which proved to be better tolerated. Repeat conjunctival biopsies performed on 12 July 2017 showed no histological evidence of melanoma. FDG-PET imaging and clinical review in October 2017 likewise demonstrated no evidence of local or systemic disease. The last review in March 2019 showed no detectable disease both clinically (Figure 1D) and radiologically. The patient remained asymptomatic on the above regimen with visual acuity of 6/7.5 in the affected eye, and eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status. This case adds to the limited literature on locally advanced CM managed with systemic treatment. One recent study reported three cases of locally advanced CM initially treated with drugs; molecular testing of one of these patients showed no somatic mutations in BRAF, KIT or NRAS genes, but with a complete response to Received: 15 August 2019 Revised: 4 October 2019 Accepted: 18 November 2019","PeriodicalId":15372,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective conservative management of locally advanced conjunctival melanoma using initial systemic therapy\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Hassan, R. Epstein, S. Cherepanoff, R. Conway\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ceo.13691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conjunctival melanoma (CM) comprises 2% to 5% of all ocular tumours, and 5% to 7% of ocular melanomas. The annual incidence of CM is 0.2 to 0.8 per million amongst Caucasians, in which population the usual age range of presentation is 55 to 65 years. The standard of care for the initial management of localized CM is no-touch surgical excision with a minimum 2 to 4 mm margin. Locally advanced disease involving orbit invasion is more challenging to manage and has traditionally been regarded as an indication for radical curative-intent surgery (orbital exenteration). Here we report a case of locally advanced and recurrent CM that has been managed successfully for the last 3.5 years using systemic targeted therapy. A 53-year-old Caucasian male presented in January 2016 to the ocular oncology unit with a biopsy confirming locally advanced CM (AJCC stage T3B) of the right eye invading the anterior orbit and upper tarsal plate. The tumour had been excised in December 2015. Visual acuities were 6/7.5 and 6/6 in the right and left eye, respectively. Staging investigations including fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography scanning revealed no metastatic disease. Mutation testing (Ion Torrent Ampliseq Cancer Gene Panel v2.0) of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue confirmed a classical BRAF (V600E) mutation. During the multidisciplinary discussion, three aspects of the patient's own preferences were identified: first, ocular removal may affect his employment as a licensed occupational operator of heavy equipment; second, satisfactory binocular vision as an enthusiastic recreational cricket player; and third, importance of normal cosmesis for lifestyle reasons. On the other hand, it was explained to the patient that surgical exenteration could well represent the only plausible curative intervention. Against that reasoning, however, it was also conceded that even proceeding to exenteration would not guarantee a cure, since subsequent locoregional and/or metastatic recurrence remained a possibility. After informed discussion and consent, the patient was offered initial management using systemic therapy targeting V600E-mutant BRAF, consisting of dabrafenib and trametinib. Patient understood that the provisional plan would be for substitution of immunotherapy (eg, anti-PD1 plus ipilimumab) with the aim of achieving a further period of long-term control, albeit not necessarily a cure. The possibility of using initial immunotherapy was also discussed, though it was pointed out that a rapid initial tumour shrinkage might be more reliably achieved using mutation-targeting kinase inhibitors, and hence this approach was chosen. Fortunately, a complete clinical and radiologic remission of disease was evident by April 2016 (Figure 1A,B). From May 2016, the clinical course was complicated by drug-related fever and abnormal liver function tests, which was at first managed with a combination of treatment delay, dose reduction, and/or steroid cover. A small recurrence on the upper lid was resected during this period, and histopathology confirmed CM recurrence (Figure 1C). By early 2017, persistent fevers and liver function abnormalities triggered a switch to vemurafenib and cobimetinib, which proved to be better tolerated. Repeat conjunctival biopsies performed on 12 July 2017 showed no histological evidence of melanoma. FDG-PET imaging and clinical review in October 2017 likewise demonstrated no evidence of local or systemic disease. The last review in March 2019 showed no detectable disease both clinically (Figure 1D) and radiologically. The patient remained asymptomatic on the above regimen with visual acuity of 6/7.5 in the affected eye, and eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status. This case adds to the limited literature on locally advanced CM managed with systemic treatment. One recent study reported three cases of locally advanced CM initially treated with drugs; molecular testing of one of these patients showed no somatic mutations in BRAF, KIT or NRAS genes, but with a complete response to Received: 15 August 2019 Revised: 4 October 2019 Accepted: 18 November 2019\",\"PeriodicalId\":15372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

结膜黑色素瘤(CM)占所有眼部肿瘤的2%至5%,占眼部黑色素瘤的5%至7%。在白种人中,CM的年发病率为每百万人中0.2至0.8人,其中人群的通常表现年龄范围为55至65岁。局部CM的初始治疗标准是无接触手术切除,最小切距为2至4毫米。涉及眼眶侵犯的局部晚期疾病更具有挑战性,传统上被认为是根治性治疗目的手术(眼眶摘除)的指征。在这里,我们报告了一个局部晚期和复发性CM的病例,在过去的3.5年里,我们成功地使用了全身靶向治疗。一名53岁白人男性于2016年1月就诊于眼科肿瘤科,活检证实右眼局部晚期CM (AJCC T3B期)侵犯前眼眶和上睑板。该肿瘤于2015年12月切除。右眼视力为6/7.5,左眼视力为6/6。分期调查包括氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描显示没有转移性疾病。福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织突变检测(Ion Torrent Ampliseq Cancer Gene Panel v2.0)证实为典型BRAF (V600E)突变。在多学科讨论中,确定了患者自身偏好的三个方面:首先,摘除眼球可能会影响他作为重型设备持证职业操作员的就业;其次,作为一名热情的业余板球运动员,令人满意的双眼视力;第三,正常妆容对于生活方式的重要性。另一方面,医生向患者解释,手术切除可能是唯一可行的治疗干预措施。然而,与此推理相反,也承认即使进行切除也不能保证治愈,因为随后的局部和/或转移性复发仍然是可能的。在知情讨论和同意后,患者接受针对v600e突变BRAF的全身治疗,包括达非尼和曲美替尼。患者明白,临时计划是替代免疫疗法(例如,抗pd1 +易普利姆单抗),目的是实现进一步的长期控制,尽管不一定是治愈。使用初始免疫治疗的可能性也进行了讨论,尽管有人指出,使用靶向突变的激酶抑制剂可能更可靠地实现快速的初始肿瘤缩小,因此选择了这种方法。幸运的是,到2016年4月,疾病的临床和放射学完全缓解(图1A,B)。从2016年5月开始,临床过程中出现药物相关性发热和肝功能异常,最初采用延迟治疗、减少剂量和/或类固醇覆盖的联合治疗。在此期间切除了上眼睑的小复发,组织病理学证实CM复发(图1C)。到2017年初,持续发烧和肝功能异常引发了vemurafenib和cobimetinib的转换,这被证明是更好的耐受性。2017年7月12日复查结膜活检未发现黑色素瘤的组织学证据。2017年10月的FDG-PET成像和临床回顾同样没有显示局部或全身性疾病的证据。2019年3月的最后一次复查显示,临床和放射学均未发现疾病(图1D)。患者在上述方案下无症状,患眼视力为6/7.5,东部肿瘤合作组(ECOG)表现状态。本病例增加了局部晚期CM系统治疗的有限文献。最近的一项研究报告了三例局部晚期CM最初用药物治疗;其中一名患者的分子检测显示,BRAF、KIT或NRAS基因未发生体细胞突变,但在2019年8月15日接收:2019年11月18日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effective conservative management of locally advanced conjunctival melanoma using initial systemic therapy
Conjunctival melanoma (CM) comprises 2% to 5% of all ocular tumours, and 5% to 7% of ocular melanomas. The annual incidence of CM is 0.2 to 0.8 per million amongst Caucasians, in which population the usual age range of presentation is 55 to 65 years. The standard of care for the initial management of localized CM is no-touch surgical excision with a minimum 2 to 4 mm margin. Locally advanced disease involving orbit invasion is more challenging to manage and has traditionally been regarded as an indication for radical curative-intent surgery (orbital exenteration). Here we report a case of locally advanced and recurrent CM that has been managed successfully for the last 3.5 years using systemic targeted therapy. A 53-year-old Caucasian male presented in January 2016 to the ocular oncology unit with a biopsy confirming locally advanced CM (AJCC stage T3B) of the right eye invading the anterior orbit and upper tarsal plate. The tumour had been excised in December 2015. Visual acuities were 6/7.5 and 6/6 in the right and left eye, respectively. Staging investigations including fluorodeoxyglucosepositron emission tomography scanning revealed no metastatic disease. Mutation testing (Ion Torrent Ampliseq Cancer Gene Panel v2.0) of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue confirmed a classical BRAF (V600E) mutation. During the multidisciplinary discussion, three aspects of the patient's own preferences were identified: first, ocular removal may affect his employment as a licensed occupational operator of heavy equipment; second, satisfactory binocular vision as an enthusiastic recreational cricket player; and third, importance of normal cosmesis for lifestyle reasons. On the other hand, it was explained to the patient that surgical exenteration could well represent the only plausible curative intervention. Against that reasoning, however, it was also conceded that even proceeding to exenteration would not guarantee a cure, since subsequent locoregional and/or metastatic recurrence remained a possibility. After informed discussion and consent, the patient was offered initial management using systemic therapy targeting V600E-mutant BRAF, consisting of dabrafenib and trametinib. Patient understood that the provisional plan would be for substitution of immunotherapy (eg, anti-PD1 plus ipilimumab) with the aim of achieving a further period of long-term control, albeit not necessarily a cure. The possibility of using initial immunotherapy was also discussed, though it was pointed out that a rapid initial tumour shrinkage might be more reliably achieved using mutation-targeting kinase inhibitors, and hence this approach was chosen. Fortunately, a complete clinical and radiologic remission of disease was evident by April 2016 (Figure 1A,B). From May 2016, the clinical course was complicated by drug-related fever and abnormal liver function tests, which was at first managed with a combination of treatment delay, dose reduction, and/or steroid cover. A small recurrence on the upper lid was resected during this period, and histopathology confirmed CM recurrence (Figure 1C). By early 2017, persistent fevers and liver function abnormalities triggered a switch to vemurafenib and cobimetinib, which proved to be better tolerated. Repeat conjunctival biopsies performed on 12 July 2017 showed no histological evidence of melanoma. FDG-PET imaging and clinical review in October 2017 likewise demonstrated no evidence of local or systemic disease. The last review in March 2019 showed no detectable disease both clinically (Figure 1D) and radiologically. The patient remained asymptomatic on the above regimen with visual acuity of 6/7.5 in the affected eye, and eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status. This case adds to the limited literature on locally advanced CM managed with systemic treatment. One recent study reported three cases of locally advanced CM initially treated with drugs; molecular testing of one of these patients showed no somatic mutations in BRAF, KIT or NRAS genes, but with a complete response to Received: 15 August 2019 Revised: 4 October 2019 Accepted: 18 November 2019
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tuesday 1 March Speakers Film Abstracts Monday 28 February Speakers Sunday 27 February Speakers Modification of Biochemical Derangements and VEGF Secretion May Prevent Diabetic Retinopathy (DR): An Advance Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1