非营利组织中新知识和实践开发的协同设计

Busayawan Lam, Irini Pitsaki
{"title":"非营利组织中新知识和实践开发的协同设计","authors":"Busayawan Lam,&nbsp;Irini Pitsaki","doi":"10.1111/dmj.12044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article focuses on a specific form of collaboration between academic researchers and practitioners: co-design. Generally, the strategic use of co-design is considered to be beneficial because, among other reasons, it better aligns outcomes to user needs. In addition, active stakeholder participation engenders new network developments and strengthens existing links. Despite this, the extent to which the co-design approach could be used to foster new knowledge and/or practices is hardly explored. Thus, our research applied co-design methods to organizational practices and examined how they may bring about benefits for academic researchers and practitioners collaborating in the context of not-for-profit organizations. According to our findings, all stakeholders considered co-design to be useful, as it helped them achieve desirable outcomes in a more inclusive and collaborative manner. The findings confirmed a number of benefits, among them confidence building. The size of organizations did not appear to affect the process or the outcomes. While most knowledge co-created through these types of projects tends to be practical in nature, new theoretical knowledge was generated through critical examination of the process/results as well as through individual/group reflection. We consider this aspect to be particularly useful for other researchers and practitioners interested in applying co-design principles to the not-for-profit sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":100367,"journal":{"name":"Design Management Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"70-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/dmj.12044","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-Design for the Development of New Knowledge and Practices in Not-for-Profit Organizations\",\"authors\":\"Busayawan Lam,&nbsp;Irini Pitsaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dmj.12044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article focuses on a specific form of collaboration between academic researchers and practitioners: co-design. Generally, the strategic use of co-design is considered to be beneficial because, among other reasons, it better aligns outcomes to user needs. In addition, active stakeholder participation engenders new network developments and strengthens existing links. Despite this, the extent to which the co-design approach could be used to foster new knowledge and/or practices is hardly explored. Thus, our research applied co-design methods to organizational practices and examined how they may bring about benefits for academic researchers and practitioners collaborating in the context of not-for-profit organizations. According to our findings, all stakeholders considered co-design to be useful, as it helped them achieve desirable outcomes in a more inclusive and collaborative manner. The findings confirmed a number of benefits, among them confidence building. The size of organizations did not appear to affect the process or the outcomes. While most knowledge co-created through these types of projects tends to be practical in nature, new theoretical knowledge was generated through critical examination of the process/results as well as through individual/group reflection. We consider this aspect to be particularly useful for other researchers and practitioners interested in applying co-design principles to the not-for-profit sector.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"70-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/dmj.12044\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmj.12044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dmj.12044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文主要关注学术研究人员和实践者之间的一种特殊合作形式:共同设计。通常,协同设计的战略使用被认为是有益的,因为它更好地使结果与用户需求保持一致。此外,利益相关者的积极参与促进了新的网络发展,并加强了现有的联系。尽管如此,协同设计方法在多大程度上可以用来培养新的知识和/或实践几乎没有被探索。因此,我们的研究将协同设计方法应用于组织实践,并研究了它们如何为学术研究人员和从业者在非营利组织的背景下合作带来好处。根据我们的研究结果,所有利益相关者都认为共同设计是有用的,因为它帮助他们以更具包容性和协作性的方式获得理想的结果。研究结果证实了一些好处,其中包括建立信心。组织的规模似乎并没有影响过程或结果。虽然通过这些类型的项目共同创造的大多数知识在本质上往往是实用的,但新的理论知识是通过对过程/结果的批判性检查以及通过个人/小组反思产生的。我们认为这方面对其他有兴趣将共同设计原则应用于非营利部门的研究人员和实践者特别有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-Design for the Development of New Knowledge and Practices in Not-for-Profit Organizations

This article focuses on a specific form of collaboration between academic researchers and practitioners: co-design. Generally, the strategic use of co-design is considered to be beneficial because, among other reasons, it better aligns outcomes to user needs. In addition, active stakeholder participation engenders new network developments and strengthens existing links. Despite this, the extent to which the co-design approach could be used to foster new knowledge and/or practices is hardly explored. Thus, our research applied co-design methods to organizational practices and examined how they may bring about benefits for academic researchers and practitioners collaborating in the context of not-for-profit organizations. According to our findings, all stakeholders considered co-design to be useful, as it helped them achieve desirable outcomes in a more inclusive and collaborative manner. The findings confirmed a number of benefits, among them confidence building. The size of organizations did not appear to affect the process or the outcomes. While most knowledge co-created through these types of projects tends to be practical in nature, new theoretical knowledge was generated through critical examination of the process/results as well as through individual/group reflection. We consider this aspect to be particularly useful for other researchers and practitioners interested in applying co-design principles to the not-for-profit sector.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Design Thinking and AI: A New Frontier for Designing Human-Centered AI Solutions From the President Designing Systems in a Fine-Grained and Inclusive Way, by Integrating Service Design within Futures Studies and Foresight Using Theory of Change to Support Participatory Visual Mapping in Urban Transformation Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1