慢性腰痛患者的腰椎间盘参数与健康人在数量上有差异吗?比较研究

Roop Singh, Pradeep Kumar, J. Wadhwani, R. Yadav, Svareen Kaur, H. D. Singh
{"title":"慢性腰痛患者的腰椎间盘参数与健康人在数量上有差异吗?比较研究","authors":"Roop Singh, Pradeep Kumar, J. Wadhwani, R. Yadav, Svareen Kaur, H. D. Singh","doi":"10.1177/22104917231161835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Studies in the past were not able to find any definitive correlation between disc parameters and LBP. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the association of the lumbar disc parameters with LBP and to find the quantitative differences between the discs in LBP patients and healthy individuals. Methodology: Fifty patients with chronic LBP (group A) and 25 healthy individuals (group B) were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine. Disc parameters of orientation and size were estimated. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in disc angle at L1-L2 ( p = 0.01), L2-L3 ( p = 0.05), and L3-L4 ( p = 0.001), and skin angle at L2-L3 ( p = 0.03) and L4-L5 ( p = 0.05) level. Length and cross-sectional area (CSA) of anterior intervertebral height, posterior intervertebral height, intervertebral disc, anterior disc material, posterior disc material; and volume of anterior disc material and volume of posterior disc material were statistically significantly more at various disc levels in group A. Antero-posterior dural sac length and CSA of the sac were statistically significantly smaller at L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. There was a significant association between average disc height and dural sac area at L1-L2 ( p-value = 0.0393) and L5-S1 ( p-value = 0.0022) and CSA of the disc and dural sac area at L5-S1 ( p-value = 0.049) in group A. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the lumbar disc orientation and dimensions between LBP patients and healthy individuals. Larger disc parameters (height, volume, CSA, and length) and altered orientation may affect the biomechanics of the spine, thus predisposing to LBP.","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do lumbar intervertebral disc parameters in patients with chronic low back pain differ quantitatively from healthy individuals? A comparative study\",\"authors\":\"Roop Singh, Pradeep Kumar, J. Wadhwani, R. Yadav, Svareen Kaur, H. D. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22104917231161835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Studies in the past were not able to find any definitive correlation between disc parameters and LBP. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the association of the lumbar disc parameters with LBP and to find the quantitative differences between the discs in LBP patients and healthy individuals. Methodology: Fifty patients with chronic LBP (group A) and 25 healthy individuals (group B) were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine. Disc parameters of orientation and size were estimated. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in disc angle at L1-L2 ( p = 0.01), L2-L3 ( p = 0.05), and L3-L4 ( p = 0.001), and skin angle at L2-L3 ( p = 0.03) and L4-L5 ( p = 0.05) level. Length and cross-sectional area (CSA) of anterior intervertebral height, posterior intervertebral height, intervertebral disc, anterior disc material, posterior disc material; and volume of anterior disc material and volume of posterior disc material were statistically significantly more at various disc levels in group A. Antero-posterior dural sac length and CSA of the sac were statistically significantly smaller at L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. There was a significant association between average disc height and dural sac area at L1-L2 ( p-value = 0.0393) and L5-S1 ( p-value = 0.0022) and CSA of the disc and dural sac area at L5-S1 ( p-value = 0.049) in group A. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the lumbar disc orientation and dimensions between LBP patients and healthy individuals. Larger disc parameters (height, volume, CSA, and length) and altered orientation may affect the biomechanics of the spine, thus predisposing to LBP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231161835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231161835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:过去的研究未能发现椎间盘参数与腰痛之间的任何明确相关性。本研究的目的是评估腰椎间盘参数与腰痛的关系,并发现腰痛患者和健康人腰椎间盘之间的定量差异。方法:对50例慢性腰痛患者(A组)和25例健康人(B组)进行腰椎磁共振成像。估计了圆盘的方向和尺寸参数。结果:椎间盘角度在L1-L2 (p = 0.01)、L2-L3 (p = 0.05)、L3-L4 (p = 0.001)、皮肤角度在L2-L3 (p = 0.03)、L4-L5 (p = 0.05)水平差异有统计学意义。前段椎间高度、后段椎间高度、椎间盘、前段椎间盘物质、后段椎间盘物质长度和截面积(CSA);a组各椎间盘水平前、后椎间盘材料体积均有统计学意义大于a组。L4-L5和L5-S1水平前、后硬膜囊长度和囊CSA均有统计学意义小于a组。a组腰椎间盘平均高度与L1-L2区硬脑膜囊面积(p值= 0.0393)、L5-S1区硬脑膜囊面积(p值= 0.0022)、腰椎间盘CSA和L5-S1区硬脑膜囊面积(p值= 0.049)有显著相关性。结论:腰椎间盘的方向和尺寸在腰痛患者与健康者之间存在显著差异。较大的椎间盘参数(高度、体积、CSA和长度)和方向改变可能影响脊柱的生物力学,从而易发生腰痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do lumbar intervertebral disc parameters in patients with chronic low back pain differ quantitatively from healthy individuals? A comparative study
Objectives: Studies in the past were not able to find any definitive correlation between disc parameters and LBP. The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the association of the lumbar disc parameters with LBP and to find the quantitative differences between the discs in LBP patients and healthy individuals. Methodology: Fifty patients with chronic LBP (group A) and 25 healthy individuals (group B) were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine. Disc parameters of orientation and size were estimated. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in disc angle at L1-L2 ( p = 0.01), L2-L3 ( p = 0.05), and L3-L4 ( p = 0.001), and skin angle at L2-L3 ( p = 0.03) and L4-L5 ( p = 0.05) level. Length and cross-sectional area (CSA) of anterior intervertebral height, posterior intervertebral height, intervertebral disc, anterior disc material, posterior disc material; and volume of anterior disc material and volume of posterior disc material were statistically significantly more at various disc levels in group A. Antero-posterior dural sac length and CSA of the sac were statistically significantly smaller at L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. There was a significant association between average disc height and dural sac area at L1-L2 ( p-value = 0.0393) and L5-S1 ( p-value = 0.0022) and CSA of the disc and dural sac area at L5-S1 ( p-value = 0.049) in group A. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the lumbar disc orientation and dimensions between LBP patients and healthy individuals. Larger disc parameters (height, volume, CSA, and length) and altered orientation may affect the biomechanics of the spine, thus predisposing to LBP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population The surgical outcome of postoperative radial neck nonunion: Retrospective case series with systematic review Tip-to-apex distance does not predict fixation failure regardless of reduction quality in intra-capsular neck of femur fractures treated with femoral neck system Real world patient-reported and health care professional-perceived pain severity in outpatient fracture clinic procedures Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sports and arthroscopic surgery in local hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1