机器人辅助修补裂孔疝:与传统腹腔镜修补术相比的优缺点:文献综述

Kim Pelzner, D. Mueller, Claudia Fuchs, Martin Maus, C. Bruns, H. Fuchs, J. Leers
{"title":"机器人辅助修补裂孔疝:与传统腹腔镜修补术相比的优缺点:文献综述","authors":"Kim Pelzner, D. Mueller, Claudia Fuchs, Martin Maus, C. Bruns, H. Fuchs, J. Leers","doi":"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_15_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The laparoscopic fundoplication has proven to be the standard technique of antireflux surgery and hiatal hernia (HH) repair over the last decade. However, robot-assisted surgery is more and more implemented in daily practice. Several studies have proven the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted HH repair and antireflux surgery. Both approaches seem to be similar regarding perioperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative symptoms, and quality of life, as well as objective assessment of gastric acid exposure. Nevertheless, high total costs as well as a considerably longer total operating time of robot-assisted surgery need to be considered. The role of robot-assisted surgery in complex cases is promising but needs to be evaluated. Eventually, the decision regarding the technique used should be based on the surgeon’s discretion and experience.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":"11 1","pages":"77 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted repair of hiatal hernia: Advantages and disadvantages in comparison to conventional laparoscopic repair: A literature review\",\"authors\":\"Kim Pelzner, D. Mueller, Claudia Fuchs, Martin Maus, C. Bruns, H. Fuchs, J. Leers\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_15_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The laparoscopic fundoplication has proven to be the standard technique of antireflux surgery and hiatal hernia (HH) repair over the last decade. However, robot-assisted surgery is more and more implemented in daily practice. Several studies have proven the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted HH repair and antireflux surgery. Both approaches seem to be similar regarding perioperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative symptoms, and quality of life, as well as objective assessment of gastric acid exposure. Nevertheless, high total costs as well as a considerably longer total operating time of robot-assisted surgery need to be considered. The role of robot-assisted surgery in complex cases is promising but needs to be evaluated. Eventually, the decision regarding the technique used should be based on the surgeon’s discretion and experience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"77 - 80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_15_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_15_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年中,腹腔镜下翻底术已被证明是抗反流手术和裂孔疝(HH)修复的标准技术。然而,机器人辅助手术越来越多地应用于日常实践。一些研究已经证明了机器人辅助HH修复和抗反流手术的可行性和安全性。两种方法在围手术期和术后并发症、住院时间、术后症状、生活质量以及胃酸暴露的客观评估方面似乎相似。然而,需要考虑机器人辅助手术的高总成本和相当长的总手术时间。机器人辅助手术在复杂病例中的作用是有希望的,但需要评估。最终,关于使用何种技术的决定应该基于外科医生的判断和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robot-assisted repair of hiatal hernia: Advantages and disadvantages in comparison to conventional laparoscopic repair: A literature review
The laparoscopic fundoplication has proven to be the standard technique of antireflux surgery and hiatal hernia (HH) repair over the last decade. However, robot-assisted surgery is more and more implemented in daily practice. Several studies have proven the feasibility and safety of robot-assisted HH repair and antireflux surgery. Both approaches seem to be similar regarding perioperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, postoperative symptoms, and quality of life, as well as objective assessment of gastric acid exposure. Nevertheless, high total costs as well as a considerably longer total operating time of robot-assisted surgery need to be considered. The role of robot-assisted surgery in complex cases is promising but needs to be evaluated. Eventually, the decision regarding the technique used should be based on the surgeon’s discretion and experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Importance of Shared Decision Making in the Decision to Prevent a Parastomal Hernia With Prosthetic Mesh Hernia Basecamp—A Free to Use, Online Hernia Learning Platform. Analysis of Its Use Since Launch in June 2021 Female Groin Hernia Repairs in the Swedish Hernia Register 1992–2022: A Review With Updates Long-Term Outcomes After Epigastric Hernia Repair in Women—A Nationwide Database Study EHS Rapid Guideline: Evidence-Informed European Recommendations on Parastomal Hernia Prevention—With ESCP and EAES Participation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1