S. Wuyts, P. Landuyt, Pieter-Jan Cortoos, P. Cornu
{"title":"5PSQ-133静脉输液管理质量监测方案评价","authors":"S. Wuyts, P. Landuyt, Pieter-Jan Cortoos, P. Cornu","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Intravenous fluid stewardship can support caregivers to optimise the patient’s outcome, avoid fluid overload or electrolyte disorders, and control costs. Implementing a stewardship initiative requires monitoring to guarantee guideline adherence. Aim and objectives To evaluate the impact of an internal audit on intravenous fluid use and identify opportunities to improve quality monitoring. Material and methods To evaluate fluid guideline adherence in a Belgian university hospital, an internal audit was organised comprising five QIs, developed by the fluid stewardship programme. The QIs were calculated every 2 weeks over a 6 month period (August 2019 to January 2020), focusing on prescription and labelling, documentation of indication and monitoring of body weight and electrolytes. Every ward steward (22 physicians, 16 nurses) received the results of the first 3 months (T1) in an electronic report. The report’s impact on the QIs between T1 and the following 3 months (T2) was assessed using a χ2 test and interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. Afterwards, stewards were surveyed on how to further optimise fluid management monitoring. Results In total, 729 patients (T1: 361; T2: 368) receiving 758 intravenous fluid bags (T1: 381; T2: 377) were screened. QIs on prescription and labelling were close to the target value. The QI ‘documented indication’ was low (21%). ‘Availability of electrolyte values’ increased significantly between T1 and T2 (90.3% vs 96.2%, p Conclusion and relevance Awareness of electrolyte disorders increased among physicians, but the direct impact of our feedback remains unclear. Other QIs showed little room for improvement and need re-evaluation. Overall results suggested a persistent need for training on intravenous fluids, especially on surgery wards, and feedback should include tailored communication with staff. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"5PSQ-133 Evaluation of a quality monitoring programme for intravenous fluid management\",\"authors\":\"S. Wuyts, P. Landuyt, Pieter-Jan Cortoos, P. Cornu\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and importance Intravenous fluid stewardship can support caregivers to optimise the patient’s outcome, avoid fluid overload or electrolyte disorders, and control costs. Implementing a stewardship initiative requires monitoring to guarantee guideline adherence. Aim and objectives To evaluate the impact of an internal audit on intravenous fluid use and identify opportunities to improve quality monitoring. Material and methods To evaluate fluid guideline adherence in a Belgian university hospital, an internal audit was organised comprising five QIs, developed by the fluid stewardship programme. The QIs were calculated every 2 weeks over a 6 month period (August 2019 to January 2020), focusing on prescription and labelling, documentation of indication and monitoring of body weight and electrolytes. Every ward steward (22 physicians, 16 nurses) received the results of the first 3 months (T1) in an electronic report. The report’s impact on the QIs between T1 and the following 3 months (T2) was assessed using a χ2 test and interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. Afterwards, stewards were surveyed on how to further optimise fluid management monitoring. Results In total, 729 patients (T1: 361; T2: 368) receiving 758 intravenous fluid bags (T1: 381; T2: 377) were screened. QIs on prescription and labelling were close to the target value. The QI ‘documented indication’ was low (21%). ‘Availability of electrolyte values’ increased significantly between T1 and T2 (90.3% vs 96.2%, p Conclusion and relevance Awareness of electrolyte disorders increased among physicians, but the direct impact of our feedback remains unclear. Other QIs showed little room for improvement and need re-evaluation. Overall results suggested a persistent need for training on intravenous fluids, especially on surgery wards, and feedback should include tailored communication with staff. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest\",\"PeriodicalId\":11998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和重要性静脉液体管理可以帮助护理人员优化患者的预后,避免液体超载或电解质紊乱,并控制成本。实施管理计划需要监控,以保证遵循指导方针。目的和目标评价内部审计对静脉输液使用的影响,找出改进质量监测的机会。材料和方法为了评估比利时某大学医院的液体指南遵守情况,组织了一项内部审计,包括五个质量指标,由液体管理计划制定。在6个月期间(2019年8月至2020年1月),每2周计算一次QIs,重点关注处方和标签、适应症记录以及体重和电解质监测。每个病区管理员(22名医生,16名护士)以电子报告的形式收到前3个月(T1)的结果。采用χ2检验和中断时间序列(ITS)分析评估该报告对T1至随后3个月(T2)间QIs的影响。之后,管理人员就如何进一步优化流体管理监测进行了调查。结果共729例患者(T1: 361;T2: 368)接受758个静脉输液袋(T1: 381;T2: 377)。处方和标签QIs接近目标值。QI“文献指征”较低(21%)。“电解质值的可用性”在T1和T2之间显著增加(90.3% vs 96.2%)。结论和相关意识在医生中增加了电解质紊乱,但我们的反馈的直接影响尚不清楚。其他质量指标显示改善空间不大,需要重新评估。总体结果表明,持续需要进行静脉输液培训,特别是在外科病房,反馈应包括与工作人员进行有针对性的沟通。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
5PSQ-133 Evaluation of a quality monitoring programme for intravenous fluid management
Background and importance Intravenous fluid stewardship can support caregivers to optimise the patient’s outcome, avoid fluid overload or electrolyte disorders, and control costs. Implementing a stewardship initiative requires monitoring to guarantee guideline adherence. Aim and objectives To evaluate the impact of an internal audit on intravenous fluid use and identify opportunities to improve quality monitoring. Material and methods To evaluate fluid guideline adherence in a Belgian university hospital, an internal audit was organised comprising five QIs, developed by the fluid stewardship programme. The QIs were calculated every 2 weeks over a 6 month period (August 2019 to January 2020), focusing on prescription and labelling, documentation of indication and monitoring of body weight and electrolytes. Every ward steward (22 physicians, 16 nurses) received the results of the first 3 months (T1) in an electronic report. The report’s impact on the QIs between T1 and the following 3 months (T2) was assessed using a χ2 test and interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. Afterwards, stewards were surveyed on how to further optimise fluid management monitoring. Results In total, 729 patients (T1: 361; T2: 368) receiving 758 intravenous fluid bags (T1: 381; T2: 377) were screened. QIs on prescription and labelling were close to the target value. The QI ‘documented indication’ was low (21%). ‘Availability of electrolyte values’ increased significantly between T1 and T2 (90.3% vs 96.2%, p Conclusion and relevance Awareness of electrolyte disorders increased among physicians, but the direct impact of our feedback remains unclear. Other QIs showed little room for improvement and need re-evaluation. Overall results suggested a persistent need for training on intravenous fluids, especially on surgery wards, and feedback should include tailored communication with staff. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest