全膝关节置换术中前后参照系统间的后髁偏移比和股骨前切面

{"title":"全膝关节置换术中前后参照系统间的后髁偏移比和股骨前切面","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The postoperative posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) and the anterior femoral cut (AFC) after total knee arthroplasty in the anterior referencing system (ARS) and posterior referencing system (PRS) are controversial.\n\nObjective: To compare PCOR and AFC in both referencing systems.\n\nMaterials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective study that included 331 patients with 443 knees that underwent primary PSTKA. The patients were divided into two groups according to the referencing system. One hundred four knees were selected for the ARS and 104 knees were selected for the PRS by using the systematic sampling method. Preoperative PCOR, postoperative PCOR, and AFC were measured and compared in each group and between groups.\n\nResults: Preoperative PCOR and postoperative PCOR in the ARS and PRS were 0.47 (SD 0.04). Postoperative PCOR in the ARS and PRS were not significantly different (p=0.43). The gaps between the tip of the anterior flange of the femoral component and anterior femoral cortex were 24.04% in the ARS and 28.85% in the PRS, with no statistically significant difference (p=0.43). Anterior femoral notching was not found in either group.\n\nConclusion: Both ARS and PRS could preserve the PCOR and showed no statistically significant difference in the AFC after total knee arthroplasty.\n\nKeywords: Posterior condylar offset ratio; Anterior referencing system; Posterior referencing system; Anterior femoral cut; Total knee arthroplasty","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio and Anterior Femoral Cut between Anterior and Posterior Referencing Systems in Total Knee Arthroplasty\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The postoperative posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) and the anterior femoral cut (AFC) after total knee arthroplasty in the anterior referencing system (ARS) and posterior referencing system (PRS) are controversial.\\n\\nObjective: To compare PCOR and AFC in both referencing systems.\\n\\nMaterials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective study that included 331 patients with 443 knees that underwent primary PSTKA. The patients were divided into two groups according to the referencing system. One hundred four knees were selected for the ARS and 104 knees were selected for the PRS by using the systematic sampling method. Preoperative PCOR, postoperative PCOR, and AFC were measured and compared in each group and between groups.\\n\\nResults: Preoperative PCOR and postoperative PCOR in the ARS and PRS were 0.47 (SD 0.04). Postoperative PCOR in the ARS and PRS were not significantly different (p=0.43). The gaps between the tip of the anterior flange of the femoral component and anterior femoral cortex were 24.04% in the ARS and 28.85% in the PRS, with no statistically significant difference (p=0.43). Anterior femoral notching was not found in either group.\\n\\nConclusion: Both ARS and PRS could preserve the PCOR and showed no statistically significant difference in the AFC after total knee arthroplasty.\\n\\nKeywords: Posterior condylar offset ratio; Anterior referencing system; Posterior referencing system; Anterior femoral cut; Total knee arthroplasty\",\"PeriodicalId\":17486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.02.13777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全膝关节置换术后后髁偏移比(PCOR)和股骨前切口(AFC)在前参考系统(ARS)和后参考系统(PRS)中存在争议。目的:比较PCOR和AFC在两种参比系统中的应用。材料和方法:本研究是一项回顾性研究,包括331例443个膝关节进行原发性PSTKA。按照参照制度将患者分为两组。采用系统抽样的方法,选取104个膝关节进行ARS, 104个膝关节进行PRS。各组及组间比较术前PCOR、术后PCOR、AFC。结果:ARS和PRS术前PCOR和术后PCOR分别为0.47 (SD 0.04)。ARS组与PRS组术后PCOR差异无统计学意义(p=0.43)。ARS组股骨假体前缘尖端与股前皮质间隙为24.04%,PRS组为28.85%,差异无统计学意义(p=0.43)。两组均未见股前切迹。结论:ARS和PRS均能保留全膝关节置换术后的PCOR,其AFC差异无统计学意义。关键词:后髁偏移比;前参考系统;后验参照系统;股前切口;全膝关节置换术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio and Anterior Femoral Cut between Anterior and Posterior Referencing Systems in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Background: The postoperative posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) and the anterior femoral cut (AFC) after total knee arthroplasty in the anterior referencing system (ARS) and posterior referencing system (PRS) are controversial. Objective: To compare PCOR and AFC in both referencing systems. Materials and Methods: The present study was a retrospective study that included 331 patients with 443 knees that underwent primary PSTKA. The patients were divided into two groups according to the referencing system. One hundred four knees were selected for the ARS and 104 knees were selected for the PRS by using the systematic sampling method. Preoperative PCOR, postoperative PCOR, and AFC were measured and compared in each group and between groups. Results: Preoperative PCOR and postoperative PCOR in the ARS and PRS were 0.47 (SD 0.04). Postoperative PCOR in the ARS and PRS were not significantly different (p=0.43). The gaps between the tip of the anterior flange of the femoral component and anterior femoral cortex were 24.04% in the ARS and 28.85% in the PRS, with no statistically significant difference (p=0.43). Anterior femoral notching was not found in either group. Conclusion: Both ARS and PRS could preserve the PCOR and showed no statistically significant difference in the AFC after total knee arthroplasty. Keywords: Posterior condylar offset ratio; Anterior referencing system; Posterior referencing system; Anterior femoral cut; Total knee arthroplasty
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) and Conventional Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study Efficacy of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in Neonatal Seizure in Rural Area of Thailand Spontaneous Sternal Fracture in Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1