{"title":"欢迎来到SIIT 2005","authors":"M. Sherif, T. Egyedi","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2005.1563791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he development, the implementation and the diff-usion of standards depend on many factors such as the type of innovation, the ease of implementation and verification of compliance, the market dynamics and the regulatory environment. This makes standard management a risky activity. On a societal level, the impact of standards, particularly in the areas of information and telecommunication, is felt far beyond the meeting rooms where the specifications are being discussed and written. Yet, when Kai Jakobs convened the first SUT conference in Aachen in September 1999, standards researchers and practitioners did not have a forum to meet and discuss how to move standards setting from a skill-based trade into a science-based endeavor. We see two main reasons for this. First, standards research is an interdisciplinary project that mobilizes expertise from various horizons. The interdisciplinary nature of the activity results in a hybrid creature that does not fit easily within the established academic boundaries. Second, the time it takes from convening a standardization committee to the deployment of a product into a market is typically much longer than the quarterly window through which financial markets evaluate companies. As a result, those that are not involved in standardization may prefer to believe in the spontaneous generation of good standards, in zero time and at no costs. What is the status in 2005, six years after the first SIlT conference? On the positive side, we have a biannual gathering at an international level and, related, the International Journal on IT Standards and Standardization Research (J1TSR). The exchange of ideas in these fora can contribute to the crystallization of shared assumptions as well as the convergence onto common tools and methodologies. This step is essential for the field to mature and to take its place in the academic cursus. On the negative side, the research community is still relatively small and the scientific basis agreed to so far does not readily translate into prescriptive models and decision-making tools for managerial control. In this stage of community and concept building, we still need to raise awareness and encourage more encompassing contributions without expecting quick results. We hope that the current volume of refereed papers is another contribution toward making standard research a legitimate academic discipline. The papers address the following topics on information and telecommunication standards: *Current trends in standardization including regulations and quality assessment. * The economic value of standardization and the effect of standards on economic development. * Experiences from standards implementation in the areas of e-government, data exchange, web security, networked applications (voice over IP and wireless LANs) as well as consumer electronics (DVDs). * Impact of patents on standardization particularly in the area of open standards. * Several aspects of the dynamic of standards (case studies and quantitative studies). In preparing this program, we were greatly assisted by the high quality of the submissions and of the reviews. Each paper was evaluated by at least three reviewers in a double-blind fashion. In appreciation, we have listed the name and affiliation of all reviewers in the Acknowledgement section. We are grateful to the ITU for hosting STIT 2005 and providing excellent logistical support including preparing the conference CD. We very much thank Jaroslav Spirco for preparing the Proceedings in the format requested by the IEEE. Members of the Advisory Committee provided useful guidance throughout the process. Finally, the generous support from BT, Microsoft, and SUN allowed us to offer limited travel grants to those that needed some assistance to attend the conference. We hope that reader will benefit from the papers. As for the attendees, on behalf of the Organizing Conmittee, we wish you a happy stay in Geneva and many stimulating and enjoyable discussions!","PeriodicalId":22233,"journal":{"name":"The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Welcome to SIIT 2005\",\"authors\":\"M. Sherif, T. Egyedi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIIT.2005.1563791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T he development, the implementation and the diff-usion of standards depend on many factors such as the type of innovation, the ease of implementation and verification of compliance, the market dynamics and the regulatory environment. This makes standard management a risky activity. On a societal level, the impact of standards, particularly in the areas of information and telecommunication, is felt far beyond the meeting rooms where the specifications are being discussed and written. Yet, when Kai Jakobs convened the first SUT conference in Aachen in September 1999, standards researchers and practitioners did not have a forum to meet and discuss how to move standards setting from a skill-based trade into a science-based endeavor. We see two main reasons for this. First, standards research is an interdisciplinary project that mobilizes expertise from various horizons. The interdisciplinary nature of the activity results in a hybrid creature that does not fit easily within the established academic boundaries. Second, the time it takes from convening a standardization committee to the deployment of a product into a market is typically much longer than the quarterly window through which financial markets evaluate companies. As a result, those that are not involved in standardization may prefer to believe in the spontaneous generation of good standards, in zero time and at no costs. What is the status in 2005, six years after the first SIlT conference? On the positive side, we have a biannual gathering at an international level and, related, the International Journal on IT Standards and Standardization Research (J1TSR). The exchange of ideas in these fora can contribute to the crystallization of shared assumptions as well as the convergence onto common tools and methodologies. This step is essential for the field to mature and to take its place in the academic cursus. On the negative side, the research community is still relatively small and the scientific basis agreed to so far does not readily translate into prescriptive models and decision-making tools for managerial control. In this stage of community and concept building, we still need to raise awareness and encourage more encompassing contributions without expecting quick results. We hope that the current volume of refereed papers is another contribution toward making standard research a legitimate academic discipline. The papers address the following topics on information and telecommunication standards: *Current trends in standardization including regulations and quality assessment. * The economic value of standardization and the effect of standards on economic development. * Experiences from standards implementation in the areas of e-government, data exchange, web security, networked applications (voice over IP and wireless LANs) as well as consumer electronics (DVDs). * Impact of patents on standardization particularly in the area of open standards. * Several aspects of the dynamic of standards (case studies and quantitative studies). In preparing this program, we were greatly assisted by the high quality of the submissions and of the reviews. Each paper was evaluated by at least three reviewers in a double-blind fashion. In appreciation, we have listed the name and affiliation of all reviewers in the Acknowledgement section. We are grateful to the ITU for hosting STIT 2005 and providing excellent logistical support including preparing the conference CD. We very much thank Jaroslav Spirco for preparing the Proceedings in the format requested by the IEEE. Members of the Advisory Committee provided useful guidance throughout the process. Finally, the generous support from BT, Microsoft, and SUN allowed us to offer limited travel grants to those that needed some assistance to attend the conference. We hope that reader will benefit from the papers. As for the attendees, on behalf of the Organizing Conmittee, we wish you a happy stay in Geneva and many stimulating and enjoyable discussions!\",\"PeriodicalId\":22233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2005.1563791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 4th Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2005.1563791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

标准的制定、实施和传播取决于许多因素,如创新的类型、实施和合规核查的难易程度、市场动态和监管环境。这使得标准管理成为一项有风险的活动。在社会层面上,标准的影响,特别是在信息和电信领域,远远超出了讨论和编写规范的会议室。然而,当Kai Jakobs于1999年9月在亚琛召开第一次SUT会议时,标准研究人员和实践者没有一个论坛来开会讨论如何将标准制定从以技能为基础的贸易转变为以科学为基础的努力。我们认为这主要有两个原因。首先,标准研究是一个跨学科的项目,它调动了来自不同领域的专业知识。该活动的跨学科性质导致了一种杂交生物,不容易适应既定的学术界限。其次,从召集标准化委员会到将产品推向市场,所需的时间通常比金融市场评估公司的季度窗口要长得多。因此,那些没有参与标准化的人可能更愿意相信在零时间和无成本的情况下自发产生好的标准。2005年,在第一次淤泥会议之后的六年,情况如何?积极的一面是,我们在国际层面上有一个两年一次的聚会,以及与之相关的国际IT标准和标准化研究期刊(J1TSR)。在这些论坛中交流思想有助于形成共同的假设,并使之趋同于共同的工具和方法。这一步对于该领域的成熟和在学术课程中占有一席之地是必不可少的。消极的一面是,研究界仍然相对较小,迄今为止商定的科学基础还不能轻易转化为管理控制的规定性模型和决策工具。在社区和概念建设的这个阶段,我们仍然需要提高意识,鼓励更广泛的贡献,而不是期待快速的结果。我们希望目前的审稿论文数量是对标准研究成为合法学术学科的又一贡献。这些文件涉及下列有关资讯及电讯标准的主题:*标准化的最新趋势,包括规管及质素评估。*标准化的经济价值和标准对经济发展的影响。*在电子政务、数据交换、网络安全、网络应用(IP语音和无线局域网)以及消费电子产品(dvd)等领域的标准实施经验。*专利对标准化的影响,特别是在开放标准领域。*标准动态的几个方面(案例研究和定量研究)。在准备这个项目的过程中,我们得到了高质量的提交和审查的极大帮助。每篇论文由至少三名评审员以双盲方式进行评估。为了表示感谢,我们在致谢部分列出了所有审稿人的姓名和隶属关系。我们感谢国际电联主办sti 2005,并提供了出色的后勤支持,包括准备会议光盘。我们非常感谢Jaroslav Spirco按照IEEE要求的格式准备会议记录。咨询委员会成员在整个过程中提供了有益的指导。最后,英国电信、微软和SUN的慷慨支持,使我们能够为那些需要帮助的人提供有限的差旅费。我们希望读者能从这些论文中受益。对于与会人员,我们谨代表大会组委会,祝你们在日内瓦度过愉快的时光,并进行许多令人兴奋和愉快的讨论!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Welcome to SIIT 2005
T he development, the implementation and the diff-usion of standards depend on many factors such as the type of innovation, the ease of implementation and verification of compliance, the market dynamics and the regulatory environment. This makes standard management a risky activity. On a societal level, the impact of standards, particularly in the areas of information and telecommunication, is felt far beyond the meeting rooms where the specifications are being discussed and written. Yet, when Kai Jakobs convened the first SUT conference in Aachen in September 1999, standards researchers and practitioners did not have a forum to meet and discuss how to move standards setting from a skill-based trade into a science-based endeavor. We see two main reasons for this. First, standards research is an interdisciplinary project that mobilizes expertise from various horizons. The interdisciplinary nature of the activity results in a hybrid creature that does not fit easily within the established academic boundaries. Second, the time it takes from convening a standardization committee to the deployment of a product into a market is typically much longer than the quarterly window through which financial markets evaluate companies. As a result, those that are not involved in standardization may prefer to believe in the spontaneous generation of good standards, in zero time and at no costs. What is the status in 2005, six years after the first SIlT conference? On the positive side, we have a biannual gathering at an international level and, related, the International Journal on IT Standards and Standardization Research (J1TSR). The exchange of ideas in these fora can contribute to the crystallization of shared assumptions as well as the convergence onto common tools and methodologies. This step is essential for the field to mature and to take its place in the academic cursus. On the negative side, the research community is still relatively small and the scientific basis agreed to so far does not readily translate into prescriptive models and decision-making tools for managerial control. In this stage of community and concept building, we still need to raise awareness and encourage more encompassing contributions without expecting quick results. We hope that the current volume of refereed papers is another contribution toward making standard research a legitimate academic discipline. The papers address the following topics on information and telecommunication standards: *Current trends in standardization including regulations and quality assessment. * The economic value of standardization and the effect of standards on economic development. * Experiences from standards implementation in the areas of e-government, data exchange, web security, networked applications (voice over IP and wireless LANs) as well as consumer electronics (DVDs). * Impact of patents on standardization particularly in the area of open standards. * Several aspects of the dynamic of standards (case studies and quantitative studies). In preparing this program, we were greatly assisted by the high quality of the submissions and of the reviews. Each paper was evaluated by at least three reviewers in a double-blind fashion. In appreciation, we have listed the name and affiliation of all reviewers in the Acknowledgement section. We are grateful to the ITU for hosting STIT 2005 and providing excellent logistical support including preparing the conference CD. We very much thank Jaroslav Spirco for preparing the Proceedings in the format requested by the IEEE. Members of the Advisory Committee provided useful guidance throughout the process. Finally, the generous support from BT, Microsoft, and SUN allowed us to offer limited travel grants to those that needed some assistance to attend the conference. We hope that reader will benefit from the papers. As for the attendees, on behalf of the Organizing Conmittee, we wish you a happy stay in Geneva and many stimulating and enjoyable discussions!
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A prototype to analyze and support standardization decisions On the effects of IS company standards on business process performance Standards of quality and quality of standards for telecommunications and information technologies US and EU regulatory competition in ICT standardization law & policy Scale of standards dynamics in JTC1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1