{"title":"锆合金包覆U-Mo单片燃料板的热力学性能评价","authors":"H. Ozaltun, J. Cole, B. Rabin","doi":"10.1115/1.4063163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Performance of two distinct fuel systems, U-7Mo fuel in zircaloy cladding and U-10Mo fuel in aluminum cladding was studied. First, a mini plate with zircaloy cladding from a previous experiment was evaluated via finite element analysis. By using the same plate geometry and irradiation conditions, another plate consisting of U-10Mo fuel and Al6061-O cladding was simulated. The results were then comparatively evaluated to explore the feasibility of employing zircaloy as an alternative cladding. Simulations indicated the zircaloy cladding plate would operate roughly 50°C hotter as compared with the Al alloy cladding plate. Larger deformations in the thickness direction for the plate with zircaloy cladding were noted. It was observed that the post-fabrication stresses in the fuel would be relieved quickly in the reactor, regardless of cladding type. Although the fuel stresses would still develop at reactor shutdown, the fuel would be stress-free during the irradiation for both cladding types. At shutdown, the plate with zircaloy cladding would have higher stresses due to higher operating temperatures. Similarly, the stresses after shutdown are higher in the foil core for the plates with zircaloy cladding. The Al cladding plate would have higher plastic strains as compared with the zircaloy cladding plate. The zircaloy cladding plate is significantly stiffer, causing higher stresses in the fuel and at the interface. Overall, employing zircaloy as an alternate cladding is not expected to produce a more favorable thermomechanical performance as compared to the performance of an Al alloy cladding plate.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermomechanical Performance Assessment of U-Mo Monolithic Fuel Plates with Zircaloy Cladding\",\"authors\":\"H. Ozaltun, J. Cole, B. Rabin\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4063163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Performance of two distinct fuel systems, U-7Mo fuel in zircaloy cladding and U-10Mo fuel in aluminum cladding was studied. First, a mini plate with zircaloy cladding from a previous experiment was evaluated via finite element analysis. By using the same plate geometry and irradiation conditions, another plate consisting of U-10Mo fuel and Al6061-O cladding was simulated. The results were then comparatively evaluated to explore the feasibility of employing zircaloy as an alternative cladding. Simulations indicated the zircaloy cladding plate would operate roughly 50°C hotter as compared with the Al alloy cladding plate. Larger deformations in the thickness direction for the plate with zircaloy cladding were noted. It was observed that the post-fabrication stresses in the fuel would be relieved quickly in the reactor, regardless of cladding type. Although the fuel stresses would still develop at reactor shutdown, the fuel would be stress-free during the irradiation for both cladding types. At shutdown, the plate with zircaloy cladding would have higher stresses due to higher operating temperatures. Similarly, the stresses after shutdown are higher in the foil core for the plates with zircaloy cladding. The Al cladding plate would have higher plastic strains as compared with the zircaloy cladding plate. The zircaloy cladding plate is significantly stiffer, causing higher stresses in the fuel and at the interface. Overall, employing zircaloy as an alternate cladding is not expected to produce a more favorable thermomechanical performance as compared to the performance of an Al alloy cladding plate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thermomechanical Performance Assessment of U-Mo Monolithic Fuel Plates with Zircaloy Cladding
Performance of two distinct fuel systems, U-7Mo fuel in zircaloy cladding and U-10Mo fuel in aluminum cladding was studied. First, a mini plate with zircaloy cladding from a previous experiment was evaluated via finite element analysis. By using the same plate geometry and irradiation conditions, another plate consisting of U-10Mo fuel and Al6061-O cladding was simulated. The results were then comparatively evaluated to explore the feasibility of employing zircaloy as an alternative cladding. Simulations indicated the zircaloy cladding plate would operate roughly 50°C hotter as compared with the Al alloy cladding plate. Larger deformations in the thickness direction for the plate with zircaloy cladding were noted. It was observed that the post-fabrication stresses in the fuel would be relieved quickly in the reactor, regardless of cladding type. Although the fuel stresses would still develop at reactor shutdown, the fuel would be stress-free during the irradiation for both cladding types. At shutdown, the plate with zircaloy cladding would have higher stresses due to higher operating temperatures. Similarly, the stresses after shutdown are higher in the foil core for the plates with zircaloy cladding. The Al cladding plate would have higher plastic strains as compared with the zircaloy cladding plate. The zircaloy cladding plate is significantly stiffer, causing higher stresses in the fuel and at the interface. Overall, employing zircaloy as an alternate cladding is not expected to produce a more favorable thermomechanical performance as compared to the performance of an Al alloy cladding plate.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.