对学生在故事结尾的错误分析是KEIRSEY性格类型的问题

Harvina Nur Zaeny, Sujiran, Dian Ratna Puspananda
{"title":"对学生在故事结尾的错误分析是KEIRSEY性格类型的问题","authors":"Harvina Nur Zaeny, Sujiran, Dian Ratna Puspananda","doi":"10.32665/james.v4i2.212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study has the aim of describing the types and factors of student errors in solving Social Arithmetic story problems in terms of Keirsey's personality type based on Polya's error analysis. This research includes qualitative descriptive research. The research instrument was questioned for classifying Keirsey's personality types, questions about Social Arithmetic stories, and interview guidelines. The technical analysis of the data carried out includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that misunderstandings of seven problems were made by Artisan, Rational, and Idealist subjects. Artisan and rational subjects did not write what is known and asked in the problem completely. In the Idealist subject, write down what is asked in the question, but it is not quite right. Planning errors were made by the four personality type subjects, where they were not able to properly arrange the completion steps. Errors in carrying out the plan were made by the four personality type subjects, where the Guardian subject did not complete the completion step and miscalculated. Artisan and Idealist subjects did not write down the solution formula. At the same time, the Rational subject did not write conclusions and formulas in several steps of completion. Re-checking errors were carried out by the four personality type subjects, where the Guardian, Artisan, Rational, and Idealist subjects got the final result but were wrong. Rational subjects also do not perform calculations when checking again. On the other hand, the Idealist subject does not re-examine the solution obtained.\nAbstrak\nPenelitian ini memiliki tujuan yaitu mendeskripsikan jenis dan faktor kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita Aritmatika Sosial ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian Keirsey berdasarkan analisis kesalahan Polya. Penelitian1ini termasuk penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Instrumen2penelitian berupa angket penggolongan tipe kepribadian3Keirsey, soal cerita aritmatika sosial dan pedoman wawancara. Teknis analisis2data mencakup pengurangan data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan8bahwa kesalahan memahami7masalah dilakukan oleh subjek Artisan, Rational dan Idealist. Pada subjek Artisan dan rational tidak lengkap saat menuliskan apa yang diketahui dan ditanyakan dalam soal. Sedangkan subjek Idealist menuliskan apa yang ditanyakan dalam soal akan tetapi kurang tepat. Kesalahan menyusun rencana dilakukan keempat subjek tipe kepribadian, dimana mereka tidak mampu menyusun langkah penyelesaian dengan tepat. Kesalahan melaksanakan rencana dilakukan keempat subjek tipe kepribadian, dimana subjek Guardian tidak menyelesaikan langkah penyelesaian dan salah dalam perhitungan. Subjek Artisan dan Idealist tidak menuliskan rumus penyelesaian. Sedangkan subjek Rational tidak menuliskan kesimpulan dan rumus pada beberapa langkah penyelesaian. Kesalahan memeriksa kembali dilakukan keempat subjek tipe kepribadian, dimana subjek Guardian, Artisan, Rational dan Idealist memperoleh hasil akhir akan tetapi salah. Subjek Rational pula tidak melakukan perhitungan disaat memeriksa kembali. Sebaliknya subjek Idealist tidak memeriksa kembali penyelesaian yang diperoleh.","PeriodicalId":33708,"journal":{"name":"MUST Journal of Mathematics Education Science and Technology","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SOAL CERITA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN KEIRSEY\",\"authors\":\"Harvina Nur Zaeny, Sujiran, Dian Ratna Puspananda\",\"doi\":\"10.32665/james.v4i2.212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study has the aim of describing the types and factors of student errors in solving Social Arithmetic story problems in terms of Keirsey's personality type based on Polya's error analysis. This research includes qualitative descriptive research. The research instrument was questioned for classifying Keirsey's personality types, questions about Social Arithmetic stories, and interview guidelines. The technical analysis of the data carried out includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that misunderstandings of seven problems were made by Artisan, Rational, and Idealist subjects. Artisan and rational subjects did not write what is known and asked in the problem completely. In the Idealist subject, write down what is asked in the question, but it is not quite right. Planning errors were made by the four personality type subjects, where they were not able to properly arrange the completion steps. Errors in carrying out the plan were made by the four personality type subjects, where the Guardian subject did not complete the completion step and miscalculated. Artisan and Idealist subjects did not write down the solution formula. At the same time, the Rational subject did not write conclusions and formulas in several steps of completion. Re-checking errors were carried out by the four personality type subjects, where the Guardian, Artisan, Rational, and Idealist subjects got the final result but were wrong. Rational subjects also do not perform calculations when checking again. On the other hand, the Idealist subject does not re-examine the solution obtained.\\nAbstrak\\nPenelitian ini memiliki tujuan yaitu mendeskripsikan jenis dan faktor kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita Aritmatika Sosial ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian Keirsey berdasarkan analisis kesalahan Polya. Penelitian1ini termasuk penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Instrumen2penelitian berupa angket penggolongan tipe kepribadian3Keirsey, soal cerita aritmatika sosial dan pedoman wawancara. Teknis analisis2data mencakup pengurangan data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan8bahwa kesalahan memahami7masalah dilakukan oleh subjek Artisan, Rational dan Idealist. Pada subjek Artisan dan rational tidak lengkap saat menuliskan apa yang diketahui dan ditanyakan dalam soal. Sedangkan subjek Idealist menuliskan apa yang ditanyakan dalam soal akan tetapi kurang tepat. Kesalahan menyusun rencana dilakukan keempat subjek tipe kepribadian, dimana mereka tidak mampu menyusun langkah penyelesaian dengan tepat. Kesalahan melaksanakan rencana dilakukan keempat subjek tipe kepribadian, dimana subjek Guardian tidak menyelesaikan langkah penyelesaian dan salah dalam perhitungan. Subjek Artisan dan Idealist tidak menuliskan rumus penyelesaian. Sedangkan subjek Rational tidak menuliskan kesimpulan dan rumus pada beberapa langkah penyelesaian. Kesalahan memeriksa kembali dilakukan keempat subjek tipe kepribadian, dimana subjek Guardian, Artisan, Rational dan Idealist memperoleh hasil akhir akan tetapi salah. Subjek Rational pula tidak melakukan perhitungan disaat memeriksa kembali. Sebaliknya subjek Idealist tidak memeriksa kembali penyelesaian yang diperoleh.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUST Journal of Mathematics Education Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUST Journal of Mathematics Education Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32665/james.v4i2.212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUST Journal of Mathematics Education Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32665/james.v4i2.212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是在Polya错误分析的基础上,从Keirsey人格类型的角度描述学生在解决社会算术故事问题时的错误类型及其影响因素。本研究包括定性描述性研究。该研究工具被用于对Keirsey的性格类型进行分类,关于社会算术故事的问题,以及面试指南。所进行的数据技术分析包括数据简化、数据呈现和得出结论。结果表明,工匠派、理性派和唯心派主体对七个问题存在误解。工匠和理性的主体并没有完全写出已知的和被问到的问题。在唯心主义主词中,写下问题中所问的,但不完全正确的问题。四种人格类型的被试都犯了计划错误,他们无法正确安排完成步骤。四种人格类型的被试在执行计划时犯了错误,其中Guardian被试没有完成完成步骤并且计算错误。工匠和理想主义者的受试者没有写下解决方案。与此同时,理性主体并没有在完成的几个步骤中写出结论和公式。四种人格类型的受试者对错误进行了重新检查,其中守护者、工匠、理性和理想主义的受试者得到了最终结果,但都是错误的。理性主体在再次检查时也不进行计算。另一方面,唯心主义主体不重新检查已得到的解。摘要:penelitian ini memiliki tujuan yaitu mendeskripsikan jenis dan faktor kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan social cerita Aritmatika social ditinjau dari type kepribadian Keirsey berdasarkan分析kesalahan Polya。penelitian1 . ini termasuk penelitian1 .描述质量。仪器2 . penelitian berupa angket penggolongan type kepribadian3 . keirsey, socerita aritmatika social dan pedoman wanancara。数据分析包括:彭古朗干数据、彭亚健数据和彭古朗干数据。工匠,理性主义者和理想主义者。帕达主题工匠丹理性tidak lengkap saat menuliskan apa yang diketahui dan ditanyakan dalam soal。世当甘主题理想主义者menuliskan apa yang ditanyakan dalam soal akan tetapi kurang tepat。Kesalahan menyusun rencana dilakukan保持主题类型kepribadian, dimana mereka tidak mampu menyusun langkah penyelesaian dengan tepat。Kesalahan melaksanakan rencana dilakukan keempat主题为kepribadian, dimana主题为Guardian主题为menyelesaikan langkah penyelesaian dan salah dalam perhitungan。主题:匠人与理想主义者。Sedangkan subject:理性的,理性的,理性的Kesalahan memeriksa kembali dilakukan keempat主题为kepribadian, dimana主题为Guardian, Artisan,理性和理想主义者memperoleh hasil akhir akan tetapi salah。主题:理性pula tidak melakukan perhitungan disaeriksa kembali。[题目]理想主义者的记忆。[题意][题意]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SOAL CERITA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN KEIRSEY
This study has the aim of describing the types and factors of student errors in solving Social Arithmetic story problems in terms of Keirsey's personality type based on Polya's error analysis. This research includes qualitative descriptive research. The research instrument was questioned for classifying Keirsey's personality types, questions about Social Arithmetic stories, and interview guidelines. The technical analysis of the data carried out includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that misunderstandings of seven problems were made by Artisan, Rational, and Idealist subjects. Artisan and rational subjects did not write what is known and asked in the problem completely. In the Idealist subject, write down what is asked in the question, but it is not quite right. Planning errors were made by the four personality type subjects, where they were not able to properly arrange the completion steps. Errors in carrying out the plan were made by the four personality type subjects, where the Guardian subject did not complete the completion step and miscalculated. Artisan and Idealist subjects did not write down the solution formula. At the same time, the Rational subject did not write conclusions and formulas in several steps of completion. Re-checking errors were carried out by the four personality type subjects, where the Guardian, Artisan, Rational, and Idealist subjects got the final result but were wrong. Rational subjects also do not perform calculations when checking again. On the other hand, the Idealist subject does not re-examine the solution obtained. Abstrak Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan yaitu mendeskripsikan jenis dan faktor kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita Aritmatika Sosial ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian Keirsey berdasarkan analisis kesalahan Polya. Penelitian1ini termasuk penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Instrumen2penelitian berupa angket penggolongan tipe kepribadian3Keirsey, soal cerita aritmatika sosial dan pedoman wawancara. Teknis analisis2data mencakup pengurangan data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan8bahwa kesalahan memahami7masalah dilakukan oleh subjek Artisan, Rational dan Idealist. Pada subjek Artisan dan rational tidak lengkap saat menuliskan apa yang diketahui dan ditanyakan dalam soal. Sedangkan subjek Idealist menuliskan apa yang ditanyakan dalam soal akan tetapi kurang tepat. Kesalahan menyusun rencana dilakukan keempat subjek tipe kepribadian, dimana mereka tidak mampu menyusun langkah penyelesaian dengan tepat. Kesalahan melaksanakan rencana dilakukan keempat subjek tipe kepribadian, dimana subjek Guardian tidak menyelesaikan langkah penyelesaian dan salah dalam perhitungan. Subjek Artisan dan Idealist tidak menuliskan rumus penyelesaian. Sedangkan subjek Rational tidak menuliskan kesimpulan dan rumus pada beberapa langkah penyelesaian. Kesalahan memeriksa kembali dilakukan keempat subjek tipe kepribadian, dimana subjek Guardian, Artisan, Rational dan Idealist memperoleh hasil akhir akan tetapi salah. Subjek Rational pula tidak melakukan perhitungan disaat memeriksa kembali. Sebaliknya subjek Idealist tidak memeriksa kembali penyelesaian yang diperoleh.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Pewarnaan Lokal Wilayah Super Antimagic Total Pada Graf Tangga dan Graf Tiga Tangga Melingkar Analisa Perpaduan Sumber dan Media Belajar Kelompok yang Dapat Meningkatkan IPK Menggunakan Regresi Dummy Implementasi Matematika Terapan Pada Kemampuan Penyusunan Rencana Anggaran Biaya (RAB) Bangunan Konstruksi (Studi Kasus: Politeknik Negeri Jakarta) Self-Regulated Learning dalam Pembelajaran Matematika pada Peserta Didik dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Literasi Numerasi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1