M. Marchand, Y. Saint-Drenan, L. Saboret, E. Wey, L. Wald
{"title":"CAMS辐射服务和HelioClim-3地表太阳辐射数据库的性能:评价德国地区太阳辐射的空间变化","authors":"M. Marchand, Y. Saint-Drenan, L. Saboret, E. Wey, L. Wald","doi":"10.5194/asr-17-143-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. The present work deals with the spatial consistency of two well-known\ndatabases of solar radiation received at ground level: the CAMS Radiation\nService database version 3.2, abbreviated as CAMS-Rad and the HelioClim-3\ndatabase version 5, abbreviated as HC3v5. Both databases are derived from\nsatellite images. They are validated against 10 min means of irradiance for\nthe period 2010–2018 recorded in a network of 26 ground stations in Germany\noperated by the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). For the CAMS-Rad database, the\ncorrelation coefficient between ground measurements and estimates ranges\nbetween 0.83 and 0.92 for all sky conditions. The bias ranges from −41 \nand 32 W m −2 ( −11 % and 10 % of the mean irradiance). The\nstandard deviation ranges between 89 and 129 W m −2 (25 % and\n39 %). For the HC3v5 database, the correlation coefficient ranges between\n0.90 and 0.95. The bias and the standard deviation are comprised between\n −22 and 16 W m −2 ( −6 % and 5 %), and between respectively\n70 and 104 W m −2 (20 % and 31 %). For the CAMS Rad database,\noverestimation is observed in the South, and underestimation in the North\nwith a faint tendency of the bias to increase from East to West. For the\nHC3v5 database, the bias is fairly homogeneous across Germany. For both\ndatabases, there is no noticeable spatial trend in the standard deviation.","PeriodicalId":30081,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Science and Research","volume":"85 1","pages":"143-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of CAMS Radiation Service and HelioClim-3 databases of solar radiation at surface: evaluating the spatial variation in Germany\",\"authors\":\"M. Marchand, Y. Saint-Drenan, L. Saboret, E. Wey, L. Wald\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/asr-17-143-2020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. The present work deals with the spatial consistency of two well-known\\ndatabases of solar radiation received at ground level: the CAMS Radiation\\nService database version 3.2, abbreviated as CAMS-Rad and the HelioClim-3\\ndatabase version 5, abbreviated as HC3v5. Both databases are derived from\\nsatellite images. They are validated against 10 min means of irradiance for\\nthe period 2010–2018 recorded in a network of 26 ground stations in Germany\\noperated by the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). For the CAMS-Rad database, the\\ncorrelation coefficient between ground measurements and estimates ranges\\nbetween 0.83 and 0.92 for all sky conditions. The bias ranges from −41 \\nand 32 W m −2 ( −11 % and 10 % of the mean irradiance). The\\nstandard deviation ranges between 89 and 129 W m −2 (25 % and\\n39 %). For the HC3v5 database, the correlation coefficient ranges between\\n0.90 and 0.95. The bias and the standard deviation are comprised between\\n −22 and 16 W m −2 ( −6 % and 5 %), and between respectively\\n70 and 104 W m −2 (20 % and 31 %). For the CAMS Rad database,\\noverestimation is observed in the South, and underestimation in the North\\nwith a faint tendency of the bias to increase from East to West. For the\\nHC3v5 database, the bias is fairly homogeneous across Germany. For both\\ndatabases, there is no noticeable spatial trend in the standard deviation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Science and Research\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"143-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Science and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-143-2020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-17-143-2020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
摘要目前的工作涉及两个著名的地面接收太阳辐射数据库的空间一致性:CAMS RadiationService数据库版本3.2,简称CAMS- rad和helioclim -3数据库版本5,简称HC3v5。这两个数据库都来自卫星图像。它们是根据德国气象局(DWD)运营的德国26个地面站网络记录的2010-2018年10分钟辐照度进行验证的。对于CAMS-Rad数据库,在所有天空条件下,地面测量值和估计值之间的相关系数在0.83到0.92之间。偏倚范围为- 41和32 W m - 2(平均辐照度的- 11%和10%)。标准偏差范围在89和129w m−2之间(25%和39%)。对于HC3v5数据库,相关系数在0.90 ~ 0.95之间。偏差和标准差分别在- 22 ~ 16 W m−2之间(- 6%和5%),70 ~ 104 W m−2之间(20%和31%)。对于CAMS Rad数据库,在南部观测到高估,在北部观测到低估,并且从东到西的偏差有微弱的增加趋势。对于hc3v5数据库,整个德国的偏见相当一致。两个数据库的标准差均没有明显的空间变化趋势。
Performance of CAMS Radiation Service and HelioClim-3 databases of solar radiation at surface: evaluating the spatial variation in Germany
Abstract. The present work deals with the spatial consistency of two well-known
databases of solar radiation received at ground level: the CAMS Radiation
Service database version 3.2, abbreviated as CAMS-Rad and the HelioClim-3
database version 5, abbreviated as HC3v5. Both databases are derived from
satellite images. They are validated against 10 min means of irradiance for
the period 2010–2018 recorded in a network of 26 ground stations in Germany
operated by the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). For the CAMS-Rad database, the
correlation coefficient between ground measurements and estimates ranges
between 0.83 and 0.92 for all sky conditions. The bias ranges from −41
and 32 W m −2 ( −11 % and 10 % of the mean irradiance). The
standard deviation ranges between 89 and 129 W m −2 (25 % and
39 %). For the HC3v5 database, the correlation coefficient ranges between
0.90 and 0.95. The bias and the standard deviation are comprised between
−22 and 16 W m −2 ( −6 % and 5 %), and between respectively
70 and 104 W m −2 (20 % and 31 %). For the CAMS Rad database,
overestimation is observed in the South, and underestimation in the North
with a faint tendency of the bias to increase from East to West. For the
HC3v5 database, the bias is fairly homogeneous across Germany. For both
databases, there is no noticeable spatial trend in the standard deviation.