神经符号视觉对话

Adnen Abdessaied, Mihai Bâce, A. Bulling
{"title":"神经符号视觉对话","authors":"Adnen Abdessaied, Mihai Bâce, A. Bulling","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2208.10353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose Neuro-Symbolic Visual Dialog (NSVD) —the first method to combine deep learning and symbolic program execution for multi-round visually-grounded reasoning. NSVD significantly outperforms existing purely-connectionist methods on two key challenges inherent to visual dialog: long-distance co-reference resolution as well as vanishing question-answering performance. We demonstrate the latter by proposing a more realistic and stricter evaluation scheme in which we use predicted answers for the full dialog history when calculating accuracy. We describe two variants of our model and show that using this new scheme, our best model achieves an accuracy of 99.72% on CLEVR-Dialog—a relative improvement of more than 10% over the state of the art—while only requiring a fraction of training data. Moreover, we demonstrate that our neuro-symbolic models have a higher mean first failure round, are more robust against incomplete dialog histories, and generalise better not only to dialogs that are up to three times longer than those seen during training but also to unseen question types and scenes.","PeriodicalId":91381,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics","volume":"51 1","pages":"192-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuro-Symbolic Visual Dialog\",\"authors\":\"Adnen Abdessaied, Mihai Bâce, A. Bulling\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2208.10353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We propose Neuro-Symbolic Visual Dialog (NSVD) —the first method to combine deep learning and symbolic program execution for multi-round visually-grounded reasoning. NSVD significantly outperforms existing purely-connectionist methods on two key challenges inherent to visual dialog: long-distance co-reference resolution as well as vanishing question-answering performance. We demonstrate the latter by proposing a more realistic and stricter evaluation scheme in which we use predicted answers for the full dialog history when calculating accuracy. We describe two variants of our model and show that using this new scheme, our best model achieves an accuracy of 99.72% on CLEVR-Dialog—a relative improvement of more than 10% over the state of the art—while only requiring a fraction of training data. Moreover, we demonstrate that our neuro-symbolic models have a higher mean first failure round, are more robust against incomplete dialog histories, and generalise better not only to dialogs that are up to three times longer than those seen during training but also to unseen question types and scenes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"192-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.10353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.10353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们提出了神经符号视觉对话(NSVD),这是第一种将深度学习和符号程序执行相结合的方法,用于多轮视觉基础推理。NSVD在视觉对话固有的两个关键挑战上显著优于现有的纯连接主义方法:远距离共同参考分辨率和消失的问答性能。我们通过提出一个更现实和更严格的评估方案来证明后者,在该方案中,我们在计算准确性时使用完整对话历史的预测答案。我们描述了我们模型的两个变体,并表明使用这个新方案,我们的最佳模型在clevr - dialog上达到99.72%的准确率,比目前的水平提高了10%以上,而只需要一小部分训练数据。此外,我们证明了我们的神经符号模型具有更高的平均第一次失败回合,对不完整的对话历史更具鲁棒性,并且不仅可以更好地推广到比训练期间看到的对话长三倍的对话,而且还可以更好地推广到未见过的问题类型和场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neuro-Symbolic Visual Dialog
We propose Neuro-Symbolic Visual Dialog (NSVD) —the first method to combine deep learning and symbolic program execution for multi-round visually-grounded reasoning. NSVD significantly outperforms existing purely-connectionist methods on two key challenges inherent to visual dialog: long-distance co-reference resolution as well as vanishing question-answering performance. We demonstrate the latter by proposing a more realistic and stricter evaluation scheme in which we use predicted answers for the full dialog history when calculating accuracy. We describe two variants of our model and show that using this new scheme, our best model achieves an accuracy of 99.72% on CLEVR-Dialog—a relative improvement of more than 10% over the state of the art—while only requiring a fraction of training data. Moreover, we demonstrate that our neuro-symbolic models have a higher mean first failure round, are more robust against incomplete dialog histories, and generalise better not only to dialogs that are up to three times longer than those seen during training but also to unseen question types and scenes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling Hierarchical Reasoning Chains by Linking Discourse Units and Key Phrases for Reading Comprehension Event Causality Extraction with Event Argument Correlations BERT-Flow-VAE: A Weakly-supervised Model for Multi-Label Text Classification TestAug: A Framework for Augmenting Capability-based NLP Tests Multilingual Word Sense Disambiguation with Unified Sense Representation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1