陶瓷和金属正畸托槽与老化树脂基复合修复体的结合强度

A. D. Bona, Ricardo Kochenborger, Luís Antônio Di Guida
{"title":"陶瓷和金属正畸托槽与老化树脂基复合修复体的结合强度","authors":"A. D. Bona, Ricardo Kochenborger, Luís Antônio Di Guida","doi":"10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nBackground: Dental resin composites undergo chemical and mechanical degradation.\nThus, the orthodontist should evaluate aged composite restoration surfaces to select the appropriate\nprotocol to successfully bond orthodontics accessories.\n\nObjective: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (σ) of metal (M) and ceramic (C) brackets\nbonded to aged resin-based composite restorations (ACR) after different surface treatments.\n\nMethods: ACR specimens (N=160) were fabricated and divided into 8 experimental groups (n=20)\nas follows: Mo (control)- M bonded to ACR; MA- M bonded to ACR after acid etching using 38%\nphosphoric acid for 20 s (A); MB- M bonded to ACR after surface roughing using a twelve-bladed\nbur (B); MBA- M bonded to ACR after B and A; Co (control)- C bonded to ACR; CA- C bonded to\nACR after A; CB- C bonded to ACR after B; CBA- C bonded to ACR after B and A. All specimens\nwere stored for 24h before σ testing. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and\nTukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode.\n\nResults: The surface treatments (A, B and BA) produced similar σ values (p>0.05) to ACR when\nusing the same bracket type. M bracket showed greater σ than C bracket (p<0.05), probably because\nof different mechanical retention inherent from bracket type. Inhomogeneous stress distribution\ngenerated complex failures.\n\nConclusion: Considering the needs of an orthodontic treatment and the surface treatments evaluated,\nsufficient bond strength was produced to ACR, irrespective of bracket type.\n","PeriodicalId":10853,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in dentistry","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond Strength of Ceramic and Metal Orthodontic Brackets to Aged Resinbased Composite Restorations\",\"authors\":\"A. D. Bona, Ricardo Kochenborger, Luís Antônio Di Guida\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nBackground: Dental resin composites undergo chemical and mechanical degradation.\\nThus, the orthodontist should evaluate aged composite restoration surfaces to select the appropriate\\nprotocol to successfully bond orthodontics accessories.\\n\\nObjective: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (σ) of metal (M) and ceramic (C) brackets\\nbonded to aged resin-based composite restorations (ACR) after different surface treatments.\\n\\nMethods: ACR specimens (N=160) were fabricated and divided into 8 experimental groups (n=20)\\nas follows: Mo (control)- M bonded to ACR; MA- M bonded to ACR after acid etching using 38%\\nphosphoric acid for 20 s (A); MB- M bonded to ACR after surface roughing using a twelve-bladed\\nbur (B); MBA- M bonded to ACR after B and A; Co (control)- C bonded to ACR; CA- C bonded to\\nACR after A; CB- C bonded to ACR after B; CBA- C bonded to ACR after B and A. All specimens\\nwere stored for 24h before σ testing. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and\\nTukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode.\\n\\nResults: The surface treatments (A, B and BA) produced similar σ values (p>0.05) to ACR when\\nusing the same bracket type. M bracket showed greater σ than C bracket (p<0.05), probably because\\nof different mechanical retention inherent from bracket type. Inhomogeneous stress distribution\\ngenerated complex failures.\\n\\nConclusion: Considering the needs of an orthodontic treatment and the surface treatments evaluated,\\nsufficient bond strength was produced to ACR, irrespective of bracket type.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":10853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in dentistry\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2542579X01666180919121640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:牙科树脂复合材料经历化学和机械降解。因此,正畸医生应该评估老化的复合修复表面,以选择合适的方案来成功粘合正畸配件。目的:研究不同表面处理后金属(M)和陶瓷(C)托槽与老化树脂基复合修复体(ACR)的剪切结合强度(σ)。方法:制作ACR标本160份,分为8个实验组(N= 20),分别为:Mo(对照)- M与ACR结合;MA- M在38%磷酸酸蚀20 s (A)后与ACR键合;用十二刃刀进行表面粗加工后与ACR结合的MB- M (B);MBA- M在B和A之后与ACR键合;Co (control)- C键合ACR;CA- C与A后的acr键合;CB- C在B后与ACR键合;CBA- C在B和a后与ACR结合,所有样品保存24h后进行σ测试。数据采用单因素方差分析和事后分析(α=0.05)。对断口表面进行检查以确定其破坏模式。结果:表面处理(A、B、BA)与ACR在相同托槽类型下的σ值相近(p>0.05)。M型托槽的σ值大于C型托槽(p<0.05),这可能是由于托槽类型所固有的机械固位不同所致。不均匀的应力分布产生了复杂的破坏。结论:考虑到正畸治疗的需要和表面处理的评估,无论托槽类型如何,都能产生足够的ACR结合强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bond Strength of Ceramic and Metal Orthodontic Brackets to Aged Resinbased Composite Restorations
Background: Dental resin composites undergo chemical and mechanical degradation. Thus, the orthodontist should evaluate aged composite restoration surfaces to select the appropriate protocol to successfully bond orthodontics accessories. Objective: This study evaluated the shear bond strength (σ) of metal (M) and ceramic (C) brackets bonded to aged resin-based composite restorations (ACR) after different surface treatments. Methods: ACR specimens (N=160) were fabricated and divided into 8 experimental groups (n=20) as follows: Mo (control)- M bonded to ACR; MA- M bonded to ACR after acid etching using 38% phosphoric acid for 20 s (A); MB- M bonded to ACR after surface roughing using a twelve-bladed bur (B); MBA- M bonded to ACR after B and A; Co (control)- C bonded to ACR; CA- C bonded to ACR after A; CB- C bonded to ACR after B; CBA- C bonded to ACR after B and A. All specimens were stored for 24h before σ testing. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc (α=0.05). Fracture surfaces were examined to determine the failure mode. Results: The surface treatments (A, B and BA) produced similar σ values (p>0.05) to ACR when using the same bracket type. M bracket showed greater σ than C bracket (p<0.05), probably because of different mechanical retention inherent from bracket type. Inhomogeneous stress distribution generated complex failures. Conclusion: Considering the needs of an orthodontic treatment and the surface treatments evaluated, sufficient bond strength was produced to ACR, irrespective of bracket type.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teeth with Apical Periodontitis Obturated in the Presence or Absence of Cultivable Micro-Organisms: a Two-Year Prospective Study of Treatment Outcomes Determine the Applicability of Moyers Analysis in the Contemporary Western Australian Adolescent Population The Top 102 Most Cited Publications Relevant to Dental Education Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Dental Radiology Anterior Labial Alveolar Bone Thickness After Orthodontic Retraction Of Anterior Teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1