官员与中国司法:清代法律中的公、私行为

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES T'oung Pao Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.1163/15685322-10656p05
Nancy Park
{"title":"官员与中国司法:清代法律中的公、私行为","authors":"Nancy Park","doi":"10.1163/15685322-10656p05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines the law of officials during the Qing dynasty (1644-1912), focusing on the body of statutes, substatutes, and regulations pertaining to the organization and operations of the imperial Chinese bureaucracy. The general objective of the article is to draw attention to the law of officials and its significance within the Qing legal system. A more specific goal is to examine how official wrongdoing was defined, differentiated, and dealt with in Qing law, highlighting the crucial distinction between the two main categories of official wrongdoing: “public wrongdoing” (gongzui 公罪) and “private wrongdoing” (sizui 私罪). Part I analyzes the legal distinction between public and private wrongdoing; Part II examines the historical antecedents of the public-private distinction, as expressed in the philosophical writings and the codified law of earlier dynasties; and Part III analyzes the substantive and procedural consequences of the public-private distinction on Qing officials.","PeriodicalId":23193,"journal":{"name":"T'oung Pao","volume":"35 1","pages":"661-713"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Officials and Chinese Justice: Public and Private Wrongdoing in Qing Law\",\"authors\":\"Nancy Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685322-10656p05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article examines the law of officials during the Qing dynasty (1644-1912), focusing on the body of statutes, substatutes, and regulations pertaining to the organization and operations of the imperial Chinese bureaucracy. The general objective of the article is to draw attention to the law of officials and its significance within the Qing legal system. A more specific goal is to examine how official wrongdoing was defined, differentiated, and dealt with in Qing law, highlighting the crucial distinction between the two main categories of official wrongdoing: “public wrongdoing” (gongzui 公罪) and “private wrongdoing” (sizui 私罪). Part I analyzes the legal distinction between public and private wrongdoing; Part II examines the historical antecedents of the public-private distinction, as expressed in the philosophical writings and the codified law of earlier dynasties; and Part III analyzes the substantive and procedural consequences of the public-private distinction on Qing officials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"T'oung Pao\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"661-713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"T'oung Pao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685322-10656p05\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"T'oung Pao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685322-10656p05","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了清朝(1644-1912)官员的法律,重点关注与中国帝国官僚机构的组织和运作有关的法规、附属法规和规章。本文的总目的是引起人们对官吏法及其在清朝法律体系中的意义的关注。一个更具体的目标是研究清朝法律如何定义、区分和处理官方不法行为,强调两种主要官方不法行为之间的关键区别:“公共不法行为”和“私人不法行为”。第一部分分析了公、私不法行为的法律区别;第二部分考察了公私区分的历史渊源,如在早期王朝的哲学著作和法典中所表达的;第三部分分析了公私区分对清朝官员的实质性和程序性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Officials and Chinese Justice: Public and Private Wrongdoing in Qing Law
This article examines the law of officials during the Qing dynasty (1644-1912), focusing on the body of statutes, substatutes, and regulations pertaining to the organization and operations of the imperial Chinese bureaucracy. The general objective of the article is to draw attention to the law of officials and its significance within the Qing legal system. A more specific goal is to examine how official wrongdoing was defined, differentiated, and dealt with in Qing law, highlighting the crucial distinction between the two main categories of official wrongdoing: “public wrongdoing” (gongzui 公罪) and “private wrongdoing” (sizui 私罪). Part I analyzes the legal distinction between public and private wrongdoing; Part II examines the historical antecedents of the public-private distinction, as expressed in the philosophical writings and the codified law of earlier dynasties; and Part III analyzes the substantive and procedural consequences of the public-private distinction on Qing officials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
T'oung Pao
T'oung Pao ASIAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The Early Qing Compilation of the Ming History in Manchu: The Contexts, Contents, and Significance of the Ming gurun i suduri From Stone Canal to Orchid Terrace: Libraries and Archives in the Two Han Capitals Books of Fate and Popular Culture in Early China: The Daybook Manuscripts of the Warring States, Qin, and Han , by Donald Harper and Marc Kalinowski (eds.) The Penumbra of the Great Tang: Poetry from the Margins of the Empire at the Turn of the Eighth Century The Quanzhou Qianfo xinzhu zhuzushi song (Or.8210/S.1635): Manuscript, Textual History, and Genealogy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1