改革宗教教育课程

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Curriculum Studies Pub Date : 2023-06-21 DOI:10.1080/00220272.2023.2226696
D. Lewin, J. Orchard, Kate Christopher, Alexander Brown
{"title":"改革宗教教育课程","authors":"D. Lewin, J. Orchard, Kate Christopher, Alexander Brown","doi":"10.1080/00220272.2023.2226696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article arises out of work undertaken within the After Religious Education project. It synthesizes the curriculum expertise of established researchers, with the expertise of current teachers of RE in England. A question drives our shared interests: how should we approach curriculum development in RE and how do we justify the approach taken? The article proceeds in three steps. First, we elaborate, contextualize, and justify this question by introducing varied approaches to the curriculum production in RE. We argue that these approaches lack a foundational influence from general didactics: an understanding of subject matter that is informed by distinctively educational theory. Addressing this omission, the second step presents an alternative approach to RE established on the ‘Bildung/didactic’ tradition, and the specific general didactic analysis of Klafki. Third, we explore this approach in relation to two teaching contexts, modelling these applications, and the principles they exemplify. We demonstrate the value of synthesizing theoretical and practical expertise for RE theory and practice.","PeriodicalId":47817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reframing curriculum for religious education\",\"authors\":\"D. Lewin, J. Orchard, Kate Christopher, Alexander Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220272.2023.2226696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article arises out of work undertaken within the After Religious Education project. It synthesizes the curriculum expertise of established researchers, with the expertise of current teachers of RE in England. A question drives our shared interests: how should we approach curriculum development in RE and how do we justify the approach taken? The article proceeds in three steps. First, we elaborate, contextualize, and justify this question by introducing varied approaches to the curriculum production in RE. We argue that these approaches lack a foundational influence from general didactics: an understanding of subject matter that is informed by distinctively educational theory. Addressing this omission, the second step presents an alternative approach to RE established on the ‘Bildung/didactic’ tradition, and the specific general didactic analysis of Klafki. Third, we explore this approach in relation to two teaching contexts, modelling these applications, and the principles they exemplify. We demonstrate the value of synthesizing theoretical and practical expertise for RE theory and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Curriculum Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Curriculum Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2226696\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2226696","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文源于“宗教后教育”项目的工作。它综合了现有研究人员的课程专业知识,以及英国当前RE教师的专业知识。一个问题激发了我们共同的兴趣:我们应该如何处理可再生能源的课程开发,我们如何证明所采取的方法是正确的?本文分三步进行。首先,我们通过引入RE课程制作的各种方法来阐述、背景化和证明这个问题。我们认为,这些方法缺乏一般教学法的基础影响:即通过独特的教育理论来理解主题。为了解决这一遗漏,第二步提出了一种基于“培养/教学”传统的可替代方法,以及克拉夫基的具体一般教学分析。第三,我们将在两种教学环境中探讨这种方法,对这些应用进行建模,并举例说明它们所体现的原则。我们展示了综合理论和实践专业知识对可再生能源理论和实践的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reframing curriculum for religious education
ABSTRACT This article arises out of work undertaken within the After Religious Education project. It synthesizes the curriculum expertise of established researchers, with the expertise of current teachers of RE in England. A question drives our shared interests: how should we approach curriculum development in RE and how do we justify the approach taken? The article proceeds in three steps. First, we elaborate, contextualize, and justify this question by introducing varied approaches to the curriculum production in RE. We argue that these approaches lack a foundational influence from general didactics: an understanding of subject matter that is informed by distinctively educational theory. Addressing this omission, the second step presents an alternative approach to RE established on the ‘Bildung/didactic’ tradition, and the specific general didactic analysis of Klafki. Third, we explore this approach in relation to two teaching contexts, modelling these applications, and the principles they exemplify. We demonstrate the value of synthesizing theoretical and practical expertise for RE theory and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Journal of Curriculum Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Curriculum Studies publishes conceptually rich contributions to all areas of curriculum studies, including those derived from empirical, philosophical, sociological, or policy-related investigations. The journal welcomes innovative papers that analyse the ways in which the social and institutional conditions of education and schooling contribute to shaping curriculum, including political, social and cultural studies; education policy; school reform and leadership; teaching; teacher education; curriculum development; and assessment and accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies does not subscribe to any particular methodology or theory. As the prime international source for curriculum research, the journal publishes papers accessible to all the national, cultural, and discipline-defined communities that form the readership.
期刊最新文献
Materialities of progressive curriculum reform: a case study of one kindergarten classroom Situating potentially and kinetically powerful knowledges: the power of meaning-making and social change The palimpsests of knowledge Principals’ conceptions of mathematics instruction: Co-constructing sophisticated instructional vision through professional development Alignment thinking and complementary curriculum: a qualitative study addressing the urgent need for environmental education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1