干血斑中卡马西平、拉莫三嗪和左乙拉西坦的 LC-MS/MS 分析和临床验证方法。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003589
Daphne den Besten-Bertholee, Ilse Wegner, Daan J Touw, Peter G J Ter Horst
{"title":"干血斑中卡马西平、拉莫三嗪和左乙拉西坦的 LC-MS/MS 分析和临床验证方法。","authors":"Daphne den Besten-Bertholee, Ilse Wegner, Daan J Touw, Peter G J Ter Horst","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring is performed routinely in patients on anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for optimisation and individualisation of therapy. The dried blood spot (DBS) sampling technique is a suitable, more patient-friendly alternative for conventional venous sampling methods. However, before DBS can be used in routine care, data are needed to establish the correlation between standard plasma concentrations obtained from venous puncture and concentrations measured through DBS obtained by finger prick. This study aims to investigate the correlation between carbamazepine, lamotrigine and levetiracetam drug concentrations in venous blood and DBS samples in the same patients at the same time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical validation was conducted by direct comparison of paired DBS and venous plasma samples. Method agreement was evaluated using Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots to provide insight into the relationship between the two analytically validated methods. For Bland-Altman analysis the acceptance limit required by both FDA and EMA guidelines is at least two-thirds (67%) of the paired samples within 80-120% of the mean of both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired samples from 79 patients were studied. For all three AEDs, plasma and DBS concentrations correlated highly (r=0.90 for carbamazepine, r=0.93 for lamotrigine and r=0.93 for levetiracetam), indicating a linear relationship. For carbamazepine and lamotrigine, no proportional or constant bias was revealed. For levetiracetam, concentrations were higher in plasma samples than in DBS (slope 1.21), implying a conversion factor is needed. The acceptance limit was met for carbamazepine and levetiracetam with a value of 72% and 81%, respectively. For lamotrigine, this acceptance limit was not met with a value of 60%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The method was successfully validated and will be used for therapeutic drug monitoring in patients using carbamazepine, lamotrigine and/or levetiracetam.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":"450-454"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytical and clinical validation of an LC-MS/MS method for carbamazepine, lamotrigine and levetiracetam in dried blood spots.\",\"authors\":\"Daphne den Besten-Bertholee, Ilse Wegner, Daan J Touw, Peter G J Ter Horst\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring is performed routinely in patients on anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for optimisation and individualisation of therapy. The dried blood spot (DBS) sampling technique is a suitable, more patient-friendly alternative for conventional venous sampling methods. However, before DBS can be used in routine care, data are needed to establish the correlation between standard plasma concentrations obtained from venous puncture and concentrations measured through DBS obtained by finger prick. This study aims to investigate the correlation between carbamazepine, lamotrigine and levetiracetam drug concentrations in venous blood and DBS samples in the same patients at the same time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical validation was conducted by direct comparison of paired DBS and venous plasma samples. Method agreement was evaluated using Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots to provide insight into the relationship between the two analytically validated methods. For Bland-Altman analysis the acceptance limit required by both FDA and EMA guidelines is at least two-thirds (67%) of the paired samples within 80-120% of the mean of both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired samples from 79 patients were studied. For all three AEDs, plasma and DBS concentrations correlated highly (r=0.90 for carbamazepine, r=0.93 for lamotrigine and r=0.93 for levetiracetam), indicating a linear relationship. For carbamazepine and lamotrigine, no proportional or constant bias was revealed. For levetiracetam, concentrations were higher in plasma samples than in DBS (slope 1.21), implying a conversion factor is needed. The acceptance limit was met for carbamazepine and levetiracetam with a value of 72% and 81%, respectively. For lamotrigine, this acceptance limit was not met with a value of 60%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The method was successfully validated and will be used for therapeutic drug monitoring in patients using carbamazepine, lamotrigine and/or levetiracetam.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"450-454\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003589\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对服用抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的患者进行常规治疗药物监测是为了优化和个性化治疗。干血斑(DBS)采样技术是传统静脉采样方法的一种合适且更方便患者的替代方法。然而,在将干血点采样技术用于常规治疗之前,我们需要数据来确定通过静脉穿刺获得的标准血浆浓度与通过手指点刺获得的干血点采样技术所测得的浓度之间的相关性。本研究旨在调查同一患者同一时间静脉血和 DBS 样本中卡马西平、拉莫三嗪和左乙拉西坦药物浓度之间的相关性:通过直接比较配对的 DBS 和静脉血浆样本进行临床验证。使用 Passing-Bablok 回归分析和 Bland-Altman 图评估方法的一致性,以深入了解两种分析验证方法之间的关系。对于 Bland-Altman 分析,FDA 和 EMA 指南要求的接受限度是至少三分之二(67%)的配对样本在两种方法平均值的 80-120% 范围内:对 79 名患者的配对样本进行了研究。对于所有三种 AEDs,血浆浓度和 DBS 浓度高度相关(卡马西平 r=0.90、拉莫三嗪 r=0.93 和左乙拉西坦 r=0.93),表明两者呈线性关系。卡马西平和拉莫三嗪没有发现比例偏差或恒定偏差。对于左乙拉西坦,血浆样本中的浓度高于 DBS(斜率为 1.21),这意味着需要一个转换系数。卡马西平和左乙拉西坦的接受限值分别为 72% 和 81%。拉莫三嗪未达到该接受限,其值为 60%:该方法已成功通过验证,将用于对使用卡马西平、拉莫三嗪和/或左乙拉西坦的患者进行治疗药物监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analytical and clinical validation of an LC-MS/MS method for carbamazepine, lamotrigine and levetiracetam in dried blood spots.

Objectives: Therapeutic drug monitoring is performed routinely in patients on anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for optimisation and individualisation of therapy. The dried blood spot (DBS) sampling technique is a suitable, more patient-friendly alternative for conventional venous sampling methods. However, before DBS can be used in routine care, data are needed to establish the correlation between standard plasma concentrations obtained from venous puncture and concentrations measured through DBS obtained by finger prick. This study aims to investigate the correlation between carbamazepine, lamotrigine and levetiracetam drug concentrations in venous blood and DBS samples in the same patients at the same time.

Methods: Clinical validation was conducted by direct comparison of paired DBS and venous plasma samples. Method agreement was evaluated using Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Altman plots to provide insight into the relationship between the two analytically validated methods. For Bland-Altman analysis the acceptance limit required by both FDA and EMA guidelines is at least two-thirds (67%) of the paired samples within 80-120% of the mean of both methods.

Results: Paired samples from 79 patients were studied. For all three AEDs, plasma and DBS concentrations correlated highly (r=0.90 for carbamazepine, r=0.93 for lamotrigine and r=0.93 for levetiracetam), indicating a linear relationship. For carbamazepine and lamotrigine, no proportional or constant bias was revealed. For levetiracetam, concentrations were higher in plasma samples than in DBS (slope 1.21), implying a conversion factor is needed. The acceptance limit was met for carbamazepine and levetiracetam with a value of 72% and 81%, respectively. For lamotrigine, this acceptance limit was not met with a value of 60%.

Conclusions: The method was successfully validated and will be used for therapeutic drug monitoring in patients using carbamazepine, lamotrigine and/or levetiracetam.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
期刊最新文献
Mobile pharmacies of the Ukrainian chain 'Apteka 9-1-1': access to medicines during the war in Ukraine. Integrating automated dispensing cabinets into the medication dispensing process: feedback from the practice in European hospitals. Cardiovascular events in eGFR-mutation non-small-cell lung cancer patients on osimertinib. Ceftaroline combination therapy for methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia and endocarditis. Predictive performance of glomerular filtration rate equations based on cystatin C, creatinine and their combination in critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1