免疫性血小板减少性紫癜患者的血小板计数控制:最佳罗米普罗stim剂量谱

Chia-Hung Tsai, J. Bussel, Allison Imahiyerobo, S. Sandler, B. Ogunnaike
{"title":"免疫性血小板减少性紫癜患者的血小板计数控制:最佳罗米普罗stim剂量谱","authors":"Chia-Hung Tsai, J. Bussel, Allison Imahiyerobo, S. Sandler, B. Ogunnaike","doi":"10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), a disease characterized by abnormally low platelet count, are susceptible to excessive bleeding as a direct consequence. While the problem of low platelet count can be addressed fundamentally either by slowing down the rate of platelet destruction or by increasing platelet production, or both, one of the more effective means of treating ITP patients is to increase platelet production with romiplostim. However, current romiplostim treatment strategies tend to produce undesirable responses where platelet counts oscillate between dangerously low values and extremely high peaks, as a direct consequence of the complex nonlinear dynamics associated with platelet count regulation. The objective of this study is to determine the optimum dose profile of romiplostim for a specific ITP patient required to maintain a platelet count of 70×109/L. Using clinical data of the specific patient's platelet count obtained in response to a series of subcutaneously applied doses of romiplostim, a standard pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PKPD) model was developed, validated, and analyzed to obtain insight into the patient's physiological characteristics. The model was subsequently used to investigate the performance of three control strategies: “fixed dose” open-loop control, “variable dose” discrete PI feedback control, and “variable dose” model-based open-loop optimal control. The control strategies were implemented for weekly and bi-weekly treatment regimens. With both treatment frequencies, the fixed dose open-loop control strategy resulted in unacceptable sustained oscillating platelet count. PI feedback control and model-based optimal open-loop control led to stable platelet count profiles after approximately 50 days but only for weekly injections. In summary, a stable platelet count is more likely to be achieved consistently in the specific patient with weekly treatments. Bi-weekly treatments are less effective because, as we show, fundamental pharmaceutical characteristics of romiplostim make oscillations in platelet count unavoidable at this treatment frequency. The results show that model-based decisions determined using patient-specific mathematical models are potentially useful for designing better treatment regimens for ITP patients.","PeriodicalId":13260,"journal":{"name":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","volume":"1 1","pages":"11800-11805"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet count control in immune thrombocytopenic purpura patient: optimum romiplostim dose profile\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Hung Tsai, J. Bussel, Allison Imahiyerobo, S. Sandler, B. Ogunnaike\",\"doi\":\"10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), a disease characterized by abnormally low platelet count, are susceptible to excessive bleeding as a direct consequence. While the problem of low platelet count can be addressed fundamentally either by slowing down the rate of platelet destruction or by increasing platelet production, or both, one of the more effective means of treating ITP patients is to increase platelet production with romiplostim. However, current romiplostim treatment strategies tend to produce undesirable responses where platelet counts oscillate between dangerously low values and extremely high peaks, as a direct consequence of the complex nonlinear dynamics associated with platelet count regulation. The objective of this study is to determine the optimum dose profile of romiplostim for a specific ITP patient required to maintain a platelet count of 70×109/L. Using clinical data of the specific patient's platelet count obtained in response to a series of subcutaneously applied doses of romiplostim, a standard pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PKPD) model was developed, validated, and analyzed to obtain insight into the patient's physiological characteristics. The model was subsequently used to investigate the performance of three control strategies: “fixed dose” open-loop control, “variable dose” discrete PI feedback control, and “variable dose” model-based open-loop optimal control. The control strategies were implemented for weekly and bi-weekly treatment regimens. With both treatment frequencies, the fixed dose open-loop control strategy resulted in unacceptable sustained oscillating platelet count. PI feedback control and model-based optimal open-loop control led to stable platelet count profiles after approximately 50 days but only for weekly injections. In summary, a stable platelet count is more likely to be achieved consistently in the specific patient with weekly treatments. Bi-weekly treatments are less effective because, as we show, fundamental pharmaceutical characteristics of romiplostim make oscillations in platelet count unavoidable at this treatment frequency. The results show that model-based decisions determined using patient-specific mathematical models are potentially useful for designing better treatment regimens for ITP patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IFAC Proceedings Volumes\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"11800-11805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IFAC Proceedings Volumes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00474\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.00474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

免疫性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)是一种以血小板计数异常低为特征的疾病,其直接后果是易出血。虽然血小板计数低的问题可以从根本上通过减慢血小板破坏速度或增加血小板产生,或两者兼而有之来解决,但治疗ITP患者更有效的方法之一是使用罗米洛stim增加血小板产生。然而,目前的romiplostim治疗策略往往产生不良反应,当血小板计数在危险的低值和极高的峰值之间振荡时,作为与血小板计数调节相关的复杂非线性动力学的直接后果。本研究的目的是确定特定ITP患者需要维持血小板计数70×109/L的最佳剂量谱。利用对一系列皮下应用剂量的罗米普罗stim获得的特定患者血小板计数的临床数据,建立、验证和分析标准药代动力学/药效学(PKPD)模型,以深入了解患者的生理特征。该模型随后用于研究三种控制策略的性能:“固定剂量”开环控制、“变剂量”离散PI反馈控制和基于“变剂量”模型的开环最优控制。采用每周一次和两周一次治疗方案的控制策略。在两种治疗频率下,固定剂量开环控制策略导致不可接受的持续振荡血小板计数。PI反馈控制和基于模型的最优开环控制在大约50天后导致稳定的血小板计数分布,但仅限于每周注射。总之,稳定的血小板计数更有可能在每周治疗的特定患者中持续实现。两周治疗效果较差,因为,正如我们所示,在这种治疗频率下,罗米普罗stim的基本药物特性使血小板计数不可避免地出现振荡。结果表明,使用患者特异性数学模型确定的基于模型的决策可能有助于为ITP患者设计更好的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Platelet count control in immune thrombocytopenic purpura patient: optimum romiplostim dose profile
Abstract Patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), a disease characterized by abnormally low platelet count, are susceptible to excessive bleeding as a direct consequence. While the problem of low platelet count can be addressed fundamentally either by slowing down the rate of platelet destruction or by increasing platelet production, or both, one of the more effective means of treating ITP patients is to increase platelet production with romiplostim. However, current romiplostim treatment strategies tend to produce undesirable responses where platelet counts oscillate between dangerously low values and extremely high peaks, as a direct consequence of the complex nonlinear dynamics associated with platelet count regulation. The objective of this study is to determine the optimum dose profile of romiplostim for a specific ITP patient required to maintain a platelet count of 70×109/L. Using clinical data of the specific patient's platelet count obtained in response to a series of subcutaneously applied doses of romiplostim, a standard pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PKPD) model was developed, validated, and analyzed to obtain insight into the patient's physiological characteristics. The model was subsequently used to investigate the performance of three control strategies: “fixed dose” open-loop control, “variable dose” discrete PI feedback control, and “variable dose” model-based open-loop optimal control. The control strategies were implemented for weekly and bi-weekly treatment regimens. With both treatment frequencies, the fixed dose open-loop control strategy resulted in unacceptable sustained oscillating platelet count. PI feedback control and model-based optimal open-loop control led to stable platelet count profiles after approximately 50 days but only for weekly injections. In summary, a stable platelet count is more likely to be achieved consistently in the specific patient with weekly treatments. Bi-weekly treatments are less effective because, as we show, fundamental pharmaceutical characteristics of romiplostim make oscillations in platelet count unavoidable at this treatment frequency. The results show that model-based decisions determined using patient-specific mathematical models are potentially useful for designing better treatment regimens for ITP patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Control of a Vibrating Axisymmetric Membrane using Piezoelectric Transducers An expert system for freshwater fish-farming industry Platelet count control in immune thrombocytopenic purpura patient: optimum romiplostim dose profile A Hybrid Model of the Akamai Adaptive Streaming Control System Control of an Industrial Scale Bioreactor using a PAT Analyser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1