采用画廊步行法提高伊朗护士麻醉专业学生的学习效果和记忆力:一项准实验研究

Q3 Medicine Shiraz E Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-13 DOI:10.5812/semj-135035
A. Khalafi, F. Javaheri, Nasrin Khajeali, M. Haghighizadeh
{"title":"采用画廊步行法提高伊朗护士麻醉专业学生的学习效果和记忆力:一项准实验研究","authors":"A. Khalafi, F. Javaheri, Nasrin Khajeali, M. Haghighizadeh","doi":"10.5812/semj-135035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gallery Walk (GW) is a student-centered educational method emphasizing team-based learning. In this approach, students actively participate in the learning process while the instructor is a facilitator. Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the GW method to the lecture method in teaching the topic of general anesthesia care during the induction phase. Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test-post-test approach involving 60 nurse anesthesia students at Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz, Iran, in 2022. The data were collected through 30 four-choice questions assessing the knowledge of nurse anesthetists in the main stages of general anesthesia induction. After randomly assigning students into two homogeneous groups, an intervention group (GW) and a control group (lecture), the study investigated the effects of the two educational methods on learning outcomes and retention of general anesthesia care during the induction phase. This was done by comparing the mean scores of the students on three tests. Results: There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean scores of the immediate posttest (GW: 22.3 ± 0.47, lecture: 20.8 ± 1.01) compared to the pretest (GW: 15.13 ± 0.87, lecture: 14.73 ± 1) (P < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant difference in the mean scores of the one-month posttest (GW: 23.37 ± 0.61, lecture: 17.33 ± 1.12) (P < 0.001) between the two groups. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the mean scores on the immediate posttest (P = 0.186). Unlike the lecture group, there was no significant difference between the mean scores of immediate and delayed (one-month) posttests in the GW group (P = 0.16). Conclusions: The GW method not only enhances knowledge but also proves to be significantly more effective than the lecture method in retaining knowledge of general anesthesia care during the induction phase. Therefore, GW is recommended as an effective educational method for topics that require long-term retention.","PeriodicalId":39157,"journal":{"name":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Gallery Walk Method to Enhance Learning Outcomes and Retention of Nurse Anesthesia Students in Iran: A Quasi-Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"A. Khalafi, F. Javaheri, Nasrin Khajeali, M. Haghighizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/semj-135035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Gallery Walk (GW) is a student-centered educational method emphasizing team-based learning. In this approach, students actively participate in the learning process while the instructor is a facilitator. Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the GW method to the lecture method in teaching the topic of general anesthesia care during the induction phase. Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test-post-test approach involving 60 nurse anesthesia students at Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz, Iran, in 2022. The data were collected through 30 four-choice questions assessing the knowledge of nurse anesthetists in the main stages of general anesthesia induction. After randomly assigning students into two homogeneous groups, an intervention group (GW) and a control group (lecture), the study investigated the effects of the two educational methods on learning outcomes and retention of general anesthesia care during the induction phase. This was done by comparing the mean scores of the students on three tests. Results: There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean scores of the immediate posttest (GW: 22.3 ± 0.47, lecture: 20.8 ± 1.01) compared to the pretest (GW: 15.13 ± 0.87, lecture: 14.73 ± 1) (P < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant difference in the mean scores of the one-month posttest (GW: 23.37 ± 0.61, lecture: 17.33 ± 1.12) (P < 0.001) between the two groups. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the mean scores on the immediate posttest (P = 0.186). Unlike the lecture group, there was no significant difference between the mean scores of immediate and delayed (one-month) posttests in the GW group (P = 0.16). Conclusions: The GW method not only enhances knowledge but also proves to be significantly more effective than the lecture method in retaining knowledge of general anesthesia care during the induction phase. Therefore, GW is recommended as an effective educational method for topics that require long-term retention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shiraz E Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shiraz E Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-135035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shiraz E Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-135035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Gallery Walk (GW)是一种以学生为中心,强调团队学习的教育方法。在这种方法中,学生积极参与学习过程,而教师是一个促进者。目的:比较GW法与讲授法在诱导期全麻护理课题教学中的效果。方法:本研究采用准实验设计,采用前测试-后测试的方法,于2022年在伊朗阿瓦士的Jundishapur医学科学大学招收60名麻醉护士学生。通过30道四选题对麻醉护士在全麻诱导主要阶段的知识进行评估。本研究将学生随机分为两组,干预组(GW)和对照组(讲座),研究两种教育方式对诱导阶段全麻护理学习效果和保留的影响。这是通过比较学生在三次测试中的平均分数来完成的。结果:两组患者即时后测均分(GW: 22.3±0.47,讲课:20.8±1.01)与前测均分(GW: 15.13±0.87,讲课:14.73±1)比较,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。另外,两组1个月后测平均得分(GW: 23.37±0.61,lecture: 17.33±1.12)差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。两组即时后测平均得分无显著差异(P = 0.186)。与讲课组不同,GW组即时后测与延迟后测(1个月)均分差异无统计学意义(P = 0.16)。结论:GW法在诱导期全麻护理知识的保留上,不仅提高了知识的掌握,而且比讲座法更有效。因此,对于需要长期记忆的主题,推荐使用GW作为一种有效的教育方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Gallery Walk Method to Enhance Learning Outcomes and Retention of Nurse Anesthesia Students in Iran: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Background: Gallery Walk (GW) is a student-centered educational method emphasizing team-based learning. In this approach, students actively participate in the learning process while the instructor is a facilitator. Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the GW method to the lecture method in teaching the topic of general anesthesia care during the induction phase. Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test-post-test approach involving 60 nurse anesthesia students at Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences in Ahvaz, Iran, in 2022. The data were collected through 30 four-choice questions assessing the knowledge of nurse anesthetists in the main stages of general anesthesia induction. After randomly assigning students into two homogeneous groups, an intervention group (GW) and a control group (lecture), the study investigated the effects of the two educational methods on learning outcomes and retention of general anesthesia care during the induction phase. This was done by comparing the mean scores of the students on three tests. Results: There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the mean scores of the immediate posttest (GW: 22.3 ± 0.47, lecture: 20.8 ± 1.01) compared to the pretest (GW: 15.13 ± 0.87, lecture: 14.73 ± 1) (P < 0.001). Additionally, there was a significant difference in the mean scores of the one-month posttest (GW: 23.37 ± 0.61, lecture: 17.33 ± 1.12) (P < 0.001) between the two groups. No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the mean scores on the immediate posttest (P = 0.186). Unlike the lecture group, there was no significant difference between the mean scores of immediate and delayed (one-month) posttests in the GW group (P = 0.16). Conclusions: The GW method not only enhances knowledge but also proves to be significantly more effective than the lecture method in retaining knowledge of general anesthesia care during the induction phase. Therefore, GW is recommended as an effective educational method for topics that require long-term retention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shiraz E Medical Journal
Shiraz E Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
Patterns of Midface and Mandible Fractures in a Government Hospital. Attitudes of Healthcare Professionals and Internship Students Toward Patient Safety During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Qom, Iran, 2021 Diagnosis of Rib Fracture and Related Complications in Patients with Blunt Chest Wall Trauma Using Point-of-Care Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography Scan Artificial Intelligence and Its Potential Applications to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic Exploring the Potential of Chatbots in Medical Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1