{"title":"克鲁格曼论现代宏观的弊病:没有选择的批判","authors":"Keith Rankin","doi":"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The views of Paul Krugman on modern macro in terms of the global financial crisis representing a collective failure of an economics profession which had become complacent, believing that financial markets could not, in themselves, cause non-trivial recessions is discussed. Krugman is right to question the capability of economics developed under the auspices of the dominant neoclassical paradigm to predict business cycle events; however, a more constructive critique is required.","PeriodicalId":41700,"journal":{"name":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","volume":"15 1","pages":"95-100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Krugman on the Malaise of Modern Macro: Critique without Alternative\",\"authors\":\"Keith Rankin\",\"doi\":\"10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The views of Paul Krugman on modern macro in terms of the global financial crisis representing a collective failure of an economics profession which had become complacent, believing that financial markets could not, in themselves, cause non-trivial recessions is discussed. Krugman is right to question the capability of economics developed under the auspices of the dominant neoclassical paradigm to predict business cycle events; however, a more constructive critique is required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"95-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agenda-A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AG.17.01.2010.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Krugman on the Malaise of Modern Macro: Critique without Alternative
The views of Paul Krugman on modern macro in terms of the global financial crisis representing a collective failure of an economics profession which had become complacent, believing that financial markets could not, in themselves, cause non-trivial recessions is discussed. Krugman is right to question the capability of economics developed under the auspices of the dominant neoclassical paradigm to predict business cycle events; however, a more constructive critique is required.