获取和开发外部知识资源:部门和企业技术强度的影响

M. Segarra-Ciprés, J. Bou-Llusar, Vicente Roca-Puig
{"title":"获取和开发外部知识资源:部门和企业技术强度的影响","authors":"M. Segarra-Ciprés, J. Bou-Llusar, Vicente Roca-Puig","doi":"10.5172/IMPP.V14I2.1950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses whether the technological environment in which firms operate conditions the opening up of the innovation process, or whether it is the firm’s R&D efforts, regardless of the sector it operates in, that determine to a greater extent the firm’s capacity to access, assimilate and exploit external knowledge. Using negative binomial models, the paper analyses the effect of external sources of knowledge on innovation outputs, and the moderator effect of technological intensity of the sector and firm. Results show that the most R&D intensive firms and sectors access external sources of knowledge to a greater extent than those which are less R&D intensive. In contrast, no substantial differences emerge with regard to the exploitation of these sources. Results also show that opening up the innovation process is not a sectoral phenomenon, since there are significant differences in the use of external sources within the industry itself. Highly open, dynamic and innovative firms can be found in low technology-intensive sectors, indicating that heterogeneity in intra-industrial innovative behaviour should be taken into account when formulating sector-based policies to support the opening up of the innovation process.","PeriodicalId":13564,"journal":{"name":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACCESSING AND EXPLOITING EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE SOURCES: THE EFFECT OF SECTOR AND FIRM TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY\",\"authors\":\"M. Segarra-Ciprés, J. Bou-Llusar, Vicente Roca-Puig\",\"doi\":\"10.5172/IMPP.V14I2.1950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyses whether the technological environment in which firms operate conditions the opening up of the innovation process, or whether it is the firm’s R&D efforts, regardless of the sector it operates in, that determine to a greater extent the firm’s capacity to access, assimilate and exploit external knowledge. Using negative binomial models, the paper analyses the effect of external sources of knowledge on innovation outputs, and the moderator effect of technological intensity of the sector and firm. Results show that the most R&D intensive firms and sectors access external sources of knowledge to a greater extent than those which are less R&D intensive. In contrast, no substantial differences emerge with regard to the exploitation of these sources. Results also show that opening up the innovation process is not a sectoral phenomenon, since there are significant differences in the use of external sources within the industry itself. Highly open, dynamic and innovative firms can be found in low technology-intensive sectors, indicating that heterogeneity in intra-industrial innovative behaviour should be taken into account when formulating sector-based policies to support the opening up of the innovation process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation-management Policy & Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation-management Policy & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5172/IMPP.V14I2.1950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation-management Policy & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5172/IMPP.V14I2.1950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了企业所处的技术环境是否决定了创新过程的开放性,或者企业的研发努力是否在更大程度上决定了企业获取、吸收和利用外部知识的能力,而不管企业在哪个行业经营。本文采用负二项模型,分析了外部知识来源对创新产出的影响,以及部门和企业技术强度的调节作用。研究结果表明,研发密集度高的企业和部门获取外部知识的程度高于研发密集度低的企业和部门。相比之下,在开发利用这些资源方面没有出现实质性差异。研究结果还表明,开放创新过程并不是一个行业现象,因为行业内部对外部资源的利用存在显著差异。在低技术密集部门可以找到高度开放、充满活力和创新的公司,这表明在制定以部门为基础的政策以支持创新过程的开放时,应考虑到产业内创新行为的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACCESSING AND EXPLOITING EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE SOURCES: THE EFFECT OF SECTOR AND FIRM TECHNOLOGICAL INTENSITY
This paper analyses whether the technological environment in which firms operate conditions the opening up of the innovation process, or whether it is the firm’s R&D efforts, regardless of the sector it operates in, that determine to a greater extent the firm’s capacity to access, assimilate and exploit external knowledge. Using negative binomial models, the paper analyses the effect of external sources of knowledge on innovation outputs, and the moderator effect of technological intensity of the sector and firm. Results show that the most R&D intensive firms and sectors access external sources of knowledge to a greater extent than those which are less R&D intensive. In contrast, no substantial differences emerge with regard to the exploitation of these sources. Results also show that opening up the innovation process is not a sectoral phenomenon, since there are significant differences in the use of external sources within the industry itself. Highly open, dynamic and innovative firms can be found in low technology-intensive sectors, indicating that heterogeneity in intra-industrial innovative behaviour should be taken into account when formulating sector-based policies to support the opening up of the innovation process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Study: KACST Technology Innovation Centers (TICs): The Case of the TIC in Radio Frequency and Photonics for the e-Society Social capital and investment in agriculture: three networks converge with implications for Australia’s rural research system Research Note: The U.S. Advanced Manufacturing Initiative: Will it be Implemented as an Innovation – or Industrial – Policy? THE USE OF AUTOMAKERS’ KNOWLEDGE IN THE COMPONENTS SUPPLIER’S INNOVATIONS: DIFFERENT EFFECTS IN DIFFERENT SITUATIONS The institutional framework of inter- and intra-organizational transferred knowledge applying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1