加拿大SoTL的特征

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2019-08-31 DOI:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8174
Genevieve Newton, J. Miller-Young, Monica Sanago
{"title":"加拿大SoTL的特征","authors":"Genevieve Newton, J. Miller-Young, Monica Sanago","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SoTL Canada recently conducted a survey to gain insight into the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) activities of faculty and staff at institutions of higher education across Canada. Questions were guided by several principles, including: (a) identifying who is doing SoTL (such as personal, institutional, geographical and professional characteristics); (b) characterizing how SoTL is being conducted, supported, and disseminated (such as collaborations with peers and students, the number of active projects), and (c) differentiating the levels at which SoTL activities are occurring and funded. While we likely did not fully capture the work being done, our inquiry nonetheless provides important data related to the current nature and scope of SoTL in Canada. We noted that the people doing SoTL show a wide diversity of characteristics including appointments and disciplinary affiliations although a majority of respondents were female, and that collaborations with both colleagues and students were commonplace. SoTL continues to be conducted primarily at the classroom level, and approximately 65% of respondents have received funding, mostly from the institutional level. We also found an increased amount of activity compared to the last Canadian survey conducted in 2012, in particular by staff from Centres for Teaching and Learning. Survey participants reported discussing their SoTL findings with their colleagues more often than with their students. A number of areas of future research are identified.","PeriodicalId":44267,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing SoTL Across Canada\",\"authors\":\"Genevieve Newton, J. Miller-Young, Monica Sanago\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SoTL Canada recently conducted a survey to gain insight into the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) activities of faculty and staff at institutions of higher education across Canada. Questions were guided by several principles, including: (a) identifying who is doing SoTL (such as personal, institutional, geographical and professional characteristics); (b) characterizing how SoTL is being conducted, supported, and disseminated (such as collaborations with peers and students, the number of active projects), and (c) differentiating the levels at which SoTL activities are occurring and funded. While we likely did not fully capture the work being done, our inquiry nonetheless provides important data related to the current nature and scope of SoTL in Canada. We noted that the people doing SoTL show a wide diversity of characteristics including appointments and disciplinary affiliations although a majority of respondents were female, and that collaborations with both colleagues and students were commonplace. SoTL continues to be conducted primarily at the classroom level, and approximately 65% of respondents have received funding, mostly from the institutional level. We also found an increased amount of activity compared to the last Canadian survey conducted in 2012, in particular by staff from Centres for Teaching and Learning. Survey participants reported discussing their SoTL findings with their colleagues more often than with their students. A number of areas of future research are identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.2.8174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

SoTL Canada最近进行了一项调查,以深入了解加拿大各高等教育机构教职员工的教学奖学金活动。这些问题以若干原则为指导,包括:(a)确定谁在进行SoTL(例如个人、机构、地理和专业特征);(b)描述SoTL是如何进行、支持和传播的(例如与同伴和学生的合作,活动项目的数量),以及(c)区分SoTL活动发生和资助的级别。虽然我们可能没有完全捕捉到正在进行的工作,但我们的调查仍然提供了与加拿大SoTL当前性质和范围相关的重要数据。我们注意到,从事SoTL的人表现出广泛的多样性特征,包括任命和学科隶属关系,尽管大多数受访者是女性,而且与同事和学生的合作是司空见惯的。SoTL继续主要在课堂一级进行,大约65%的答复者获得了资金,主要来自机构一级。我们还发现,与2012年进行的上一次加拿大调查相比,活动的数量有所增加,尤其是来自教与学中心的员工。调查参与者报告说,他们与同事讨论SoTL发现的频率要高于与学生讨论。确定了未来研究的若干领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing SoTL Across Canada
SoTL Canada recently conducted a survey to gain insight into the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) activities of faculty and staff at institutions of higher education across Canada. Questions were guided by several principles, including: (a) identifying who is doing SoTL (such as personal, institutional, geographical and professional characteristics); (b) characterizing how SoTL is being conducted, supported, and disseminated (such as collaborations with peers and students, the number of active projects), and (c) differentiating the levels at which SoTL activities are occurring and funded. While we likely did not fully capture the work being done, our inquiry nonetheless provides important data related to the current nature and scope of SoTL in Canada. We noted that the people doing SoTL show a wide diversity of characteristics including appointments and disciplinary affiliations although a majority of respondents were female, and that collaborations with both colleagues and students were commonplace. SoTL continues to be conducted primarily at the classroom level, and approximately 65% of respondents have received funding, mostly from the institutional level. We also found an increased amount of activity compared to the last Canadian survey conducted in 2012, in particular by staff from Centres for Teaching and Learning. Survey participants reported discussing their SoTL findings with their colleagues more often than with their students. A number of areas of future research are identified.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Value of Integrating Writing and Writing Instruction into a Research Methods Course Student Perceptions on the Benefits and Barriers to Study Abroad Renewing our Commitment to Teaching Excellence through SoTL: An Introduction to Issue 14.1 Developing an Undergraduate Career Conference: Leveraging Mentorship to Promote Career Discovery Facilitated Study Groups for Undergraduate Organic Chemistry: Experience from a Large Public Canadian University
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1