在2013/48/EU和2016/1919/EU指令范围内的波兰刑事诉讼司法阶段有效获得辩护律师

Adrian Zbiciak
{"title":"在2013/48/EU和2016/1919/EU指令范围内的波兰刑事诉讼司法阶段有效获得辩护律师","authors":"Adrian Zbiciak","doi":"10.31743/recl.6429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyses certain regulations of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the right of the accused to access a defence counsel, limited to the stage of proceedings before a court, in the context of the provisions of the two European Union’s legal acts regarding this issue: Directive 2013/48/EU and Directive 2016/1919/EU. The provisions of the Polish CCP give the opportunity to maintain the standard of Directive 2013/48. However, the problem may occur when there is an ex officio defence counsel appointed and the court would decide to proceed in his/her absence. As for the standard arising from Directive 2016/1919, Polish provisions regarding the stage of judicial proceedings meet the European standard to a level even higher than the minimum. The only significant problem may arise from the obligation to submit an application for the appointment of an ex officio defence counsel within a specified period, but still due to specific solutions provided in Polish CCP, the standard of 2016 Directive is implemented.","PeriodicalId":20823,"journal":{"name":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","volume":"65 1","pages":"153-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective Access to Defence Counsel in the Judicial Stage of Polish Criminal Proceedings in the Scope of Directives 2013/48/EU and 2016/1919/EU\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Zbiciak\",\"doi\":\"10.31743/recl.6429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyses certain regulations of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the right of the accused to access a defence counsel, limited to the stage of proceedings before a court, in the context of the provisions of the two European Union’s legal acts regarding this issue: Directive 2013/48/EU and Directive 2016/1919/EU. The provisions of the Polish CCP give the opportunity to maintain the standard of Directive 2013/48. However, the problem may occur when there is an ex officio defence counsel appointed and the court would decide to proceed in his/her absence. As for the standard arising from Directive 2016/1919, Polish provisions regarding the stage of judicial proceedings meet the European standard to a level even higher than the minimum. The only significant problem may arise from the obligation to submit an application for the appointment of an ex officio defence counsel within a specified period, but still due to specific solutions provided in Polish CCP, the standard of 2016 Directive is implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"153-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.6429\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recueil des Travaux Chimiques des Pays-Bas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.6429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了波兰刑事诉讼法中关于被告在法庭诉讼阶段获得辩护律师的权利的某些规定,并结合欧盟关于这一问题的两项法律法案的规定:2013/48/EU指令和2016/1919/EU指令。波兰CCP的规定为维持2013/48号指令的标准提供了机会。但是,当指定了一名当然辩护律师,而法院决定在他/她缺席的情况下进行诉讼时,可能会出现问题。至于2016/1919号指令产生的标准,波兰关于司法程序阶段的规定达到了欧洲标准,甚至高于最低标准。唯一的重大问题可能来自于在规定期限内提交任命当然辩护律师的申请的义务,但由于波兰CCP提供的具体解决方案,2016年指令的标准得以实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effective Access to Defence Counsel in the Judicial Stage of Polish Criminal Proceedings in the Scope of Directives 2013/48/EU and 2016/1919/EU
The article analyses certain regulations of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure regarding the right of the accused to access a defence counsel, limited to the stage of proceedings before a court, in the context of the provisions of the two European Union’s legal acts regarding this issue: Directive 2013/48/EU and Directive 2016/1919/EU. The provisions of the Polish CCP give the opportunity to maintain the standard of Directive 2013/48. However, the problem may occur when there is an ex officio defence counsel appointed and the court would decide to proceed in his/her absence. As for the standard arising from Directive 2016/1919, Polish provisions regarding the stage of judicial proceedings meet the European standard to a level even higher than the minimum. The only significant problem may arise from the obligation to submit an application for the appointment of an ex officio defence counsel within a specified period, but still due to specific solutions provided in Polish CCP, the standard of 2016 Directive is implemented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investing on the Polish Market of Condo-Hotels and Apart-Hotels – Selected Legal Issues Environmental Management of ISO 14001 System Enforcement in EU Countries Councillor Clubs in Communes in Poland and France Observance of Human Rights as an Element of Shaping the Position of the European Enterprise in the Knowledge-Based Economy Financial-Law Problems in Providing Free-of-Charge Legal Aid in Poland. Legal Comparative Aspects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1