隐私与审查:另一个视角

Will Buck
{"title":"隐私与审查:另一个视角","authors":"Will Buck","doi":"10.1080/14649055.2016.1214520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A traditional expectation for publicly funded libraries is that they should be institutions where patron records are kept confidential and a standard of privacy is maintained. After the events of 911, methods increasing search and surveillance powers and reducing legal protections were drafted into law as the “Patriot Act.” Searching patron records can be rendered ineffective by library procedures that keep identifiable information to a minimum. Librarians must make responsible collection development decisions while avoiding the pitfalls of censorship. Information has value, and can help or hinder those in the pursuit of goals. Outsourcing collection development decisions is, therefore, not an ideal practice. Librarians should use their training and experience in the selection of information materials.","PeriodicalId":43196,"journal":{"name":"LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy and Censorship: Another Look\",\"authors\":\"Will Buck\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14649055.2016.1214520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A traditional expectation for publicly funded libraries is that they should be institutions where patron records are kept confidential and a standard of privacy is maintained. After the events of 911, methods increasing search and surveillance powers and reducing legal protections were drafted into law as the “Patriot Act.” Searching patron records can be rendered ineffective by library procedures that keep identifiable information to a minimum. Librarians must make responsible collection development decisions while avoiding the pitfalls of censorship. Information has value, and can help or hinder those in the pursuit of goals. Outsourcing collection development decisions is, therefore, not an ideal practice. Librarians should use their training and experience in the selection of information materials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43196,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2016.1214520\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2016.1214520","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对公共资助的图书馆的传统期望是,它们应该是对用户记录保密并保持隐私标准的机构。911事件后,增加搜查和监视权力以及减少法律保护的方法被起草为“爱国者法案”。图书馆将可识别信息保持在最低限度的程序可能会使搜索用户记录变得无效。图书馆员必须在避免审查陷阱的同时,做出负责任的馆藏发展决策。信息是有价值的,可以帮助或阻碍人们追求目标。因此,外包收集开发决策并不是一个理想的实践。图书馆员应该利用他们在选择信息材料方面的培训和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Privacy and Censorship: Another Look
A traditional expectation for publicly funded libraries is that they should be institutions where patron records are kept confidential and a standard of privacy is maintained. After the events of 911, methods increasing search and surveillance powers and reducing legal protections were drafted into law as the “Patriot Act.” Searching patron records can be rendered ineffective by library procedures that keep identifiable information to a minimum. Librarians must make responsible collection development decisions while avoiding the pitfalls of censorship. Information has value, and can help or hinder those in the pursuit of goals. Outsourcing collection development decisions is, therefore, not an ideal practice. Librarians should use their training and experience in the selection of information materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES
LIBRARY COLLECTIONS ACQUISITIONS & TECHNICAL SERVICES INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services provides a forum for the international exchange of ideas and experiences among members of the library collection management, technical services, vendor and publishing communities throughout the world. It is a comprehensive publication designed to bring together many of the specializations within the broad areas of library collection management and technical services including, but by no means limited to, acquisition of books and serials in academic, public, school and special libraries; cataloging and authority control.
期刊最新文献
Special Digital Repository Practice - Developing a Service-Oriented Database of Cases of Emergency Management at Jinan University Four Categories of Academic Libraries: A Cluster Analysis Based on Collections, Expenditures, and Circulation per Student Data An Examination of the Quality of Social Sciences Journals Published in Nigeria: Implications for Collection Development Price Determinants of Scholarly Business Books: An Econometric Model Celebrating Cuba! Collaborating to Provide Global Access to the Cuban National Library's Catalog Records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1