英格兰和威尔士的电子监控

G. Mair
{"title":"英格兰和威尔士的电子监控","authors":"G. Mair","doi":"10.1177/1466802505055836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of an evidence-based approach to policy and practice has been a defining characteristic of the Labour administrations since 1997. This article uses the example of electronic monitoring of offenders in England and Wales to assess how far its introduction and development could be said to be evidence-based. While the idea of evidence-based policy or practice may appear appealing, the complex nature of the policy process and the question of what constitutes evidence, render it problematic. The research into electronic monitoring—all of it carried out or commissioned by government—carries consistent messages, but these do not seem to have been heeded by government. As far as the electronic monitoring of offenders is concerned, evidence-based remains at the level of a rhetorical claim.","PeriodicalId":10793,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice","volume":"145 1","pages":"257 - 277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic monitoring in England and Wales\",\"authors\":\"G. Mair\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1466802505055836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The importance of an evidence-based approach to policy and practice has been a defining characteristic of the Labour administrations since 1997. This article uses the example of electronic monitoring of offenders in England and Wales to assess how far its introduction and development could be said to be evidence-based. While the idea of evidence-based policy or practice may appear appealing, the complex nature of the policy process and the question of what constitutes evidence, render it problematic. The research into electronic monitoring—all of it carried out or commissioned by government—carries consistent messages, but these do not seem to have been heeded by government. As far as the electronic monitoring of offenders is concerned, evidence-based remains at the level of a rhetorical claim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"257 - 277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802505055836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1466802505055836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

自1997年以来,对政策和实践采取循证方法的重要性一直是工党政府的一个决定性特征。本文以英格兰和威尔士的罪犯电子监控为例,评估电子监控的引入和发展在多大程度上可以说是基于证据的。虽然以证据为基础的政策或实践的想法似乎很有吸引力,但政策过程的复杂性以及构成证据的问题使其存在问题。对电子监控的研究——所有这些研究都是由政府进行或委托进行的——传达了一致的信息,但政府似乎没有注意到这些信息。就电子监控违法者而言,基于证据的说法仍然停留在口头上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electronic monitoring in England and Wales
The importance of an evidence-based approach to policy and practice has been a defining characteristic of the Labour administrations since 1997. This article uses the example of electronic monitoring of offenders in England and Wales to assess how far its introduction and development could be said to be evidence-based. While the idea of evidence-based policy or practice may appear appealing, the complex nature of the policy process and the question of what constitutes evidence, render it problematic. The research into electronic monitoring—all of it carried out or commissioned by government—carries consistent messages, but these do not seem to have been heeded by government. As far as the electronic monitoring of offenders is concerned, evidence-based remains at the level of a rhetorical claim.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Discursive Construction of Co-Ethnic Migration A Note on Optimal Allocation Mechanisms Annual Index Educating policymakers and setting the criminal justice policymaking agenda Facing inwards and outwards? Institutional racism, race equality and the role of Black and Asian professional associations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1