整合、人口委托和监狱保健和福利——通过远程医疗研究探索益处和挑战

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2022-06-03 DOI:10.1108/jica-11-2021-0055
Chantal Edge, N. Luffingham, G. Black, Julie George
{"title":"整合、人口委托和监狱保健和福利——通过远程医疗研究探索益处和挑战","authors":"Chantal Edge, N. Luffingham, G. Black, Julie George","doi":"10.1108/jica-11-2021-0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper seeks to understand relationships between prison healthcare and integrated care systems (ICS), including how these affect the delivery of new healthcare interventions. It also aims to understand how closer integration between prison and ICS could improve cross system working between community and prison healthcare teams, and highlights challenges that exist to integration between prison healthcare and ICS.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses evidence from research on the implementation of a pilot study to establish telemedicine secondary care appointments between prisons and an acute trust in one English region (a cross-system intervention). Qualitative interview data were collected from prison (n = 12) and community (n = 8) healthcare staff related to the experience of implementing a cross-system telemedicine initiative. Thematic analysis was undertaken on interview data, guided by an implementation theory and framework.FindingsThe research found four main themes related to the closer integration between prison healthcare and ICS: (1) Recognition of prison health as a priority; (2) Finding a way to reconcile networks and finances between community and prison commissioning; (3) Awareness of prison service influence on NHS healthcare planning and delivery; and (4) Shared investment in prison health can lead to benefits.Originality/valueThis is the first article to provide research evidence to support or challenge the integration of specialist health and justice (H&J) commissioning into local population health.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integration, population commissioning and prison health and well-being – an exploration of benefits and challenges through the study of telemedicine\",\"authors\":\"Chantal Edge, N. Luffingham, G. Black, Julie George\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jica-11-2021-0055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis paper seeks to understand relationships between prison healthcare and integrated care systems (ICS), including how these affect the delivery of new healthcare interventions. It also aims to understand how closer integration between prison and ICS could improve cross system working between community and prison healthcare teams, and highlights challenges that exist to integration between prison healthcare and ICS.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses evidence from research on the implementation of a pilot study to establish telemedicine secondary care appointments between prisons and an acute trust in one English region (a cross-system intervention). Qualitative interview data were collected from prison (n = 12) and community (n = 8) healthcare staff related to the experience of implementing a cross-system telemedicine initiative. Thematic analysis was undertaken on interview data, guided by an implementation theory and framework.FindingsThe research found four main themes related to the closer integration between prison healthcare and ICS: (1) Recognition of prison health as a priority; (2) Finding a way to reconcile networks and finances between community and prison commissioning; (3) Awareness of prison service influence on NHS healthcare planning and delivery; and (4) Shared investment in prison health can lead to benefits.Originality/valueThis is the first article to provide research evidence to support or challenge the integration of specialist health and justice (H&J) commissioning into local population health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-11-2021-0055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-11-2021-0055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文旨在了解监狱医疗保健和综合护理系统(ICS)之间的关系,包括它们如何影响新的医疗保健干预措施的提供。它还旨在了解监狱和ICS之间更紧密的整合如何改善社区和监狱医疗团队之间的跨系统工作,并强调监狱医疗与ICS之间整合存在的挑战。设计/方法/方法本研究使用了一项试点研究的实施证据,该研究旨在在英国一个地区的监狱和急性信任之间建立远程医疗二级保健预约(跨系统干预)。定性访谈数据来自监狱(n = 12)和社区(n = 8)与实施跨系统远程医疗倡议相关的卫生保健人员。在执行理论和框架的指导下,对访谈数据进行了专题分析。调查结果研究发现,监狱保健与ICS之间的紧密结合涉及四个主要主题:(1)承认监狱保健是一项优先事项;(2)寻找一种方法来协调社区和监狱之间的网络和资金;(3)认识到监狱服务对国民保健服务计划和提供的影响;(4)共同投资监狱卫生可产生效益。原创性/价值这是第一篇提供研究证据来支持或挑战专家卫生与司法(H&J)委托融入当地人口健康的文章。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integration, population commissioning and prison health and well-being – an exploration of benefits and challenges through the study of telemedicine
PurposeThis paper seeks to understand relationships between prison healthcare and integrated care systems (ICS), including how these affect the delivery of new healthcare interventions. It also aims to understand how closer integration between prison and ICS could improve cross system working between community and prison healthcare teams, and highlights challenges that exist to integration between prison healthcare and ICS.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses evidence from research on the implementation of a pilot study to establish telemedicine secondary care appointments between prisons and an acute trust in one English region (a cross-system intervention). Qualitative interview data were collected from prison (n = 12) and community (n = 8) healthcare staff related to the experience of implementing a cross-system telemedicine initiative. Thematic analysis was undertaken on interview data, guided by an implementation theory and framework.FindingsThe research found four main themes related to the closer integration between prison healthcare and ICS: (1) Recognition of prison health as a priority; (2) Finding a way to reconcile networks and finances between community and prison commissioning; (3) Awareness of prison service influence on NHS healthcare planning and delivery; and (4) Shared investment in prison health can lead to benefits.Originality/valueThis is the first article to provide research evidence to support or challenge the integration of specialist health and justice (H&J) commissioning into local population health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Integrated care’s missing piece: the US experience Concept analysis of patient journey disruptions: the obstacle of integrated care Community-engaged co-design of a quality improvement capacity building program within an integrated health system in Ontario, Canada Commissioning for integration: exploring the dynamics of the “subsidy tables” approach in Dutch social care delivery Reimagining chronic pain management: the case for integrated care in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1