德文版修订儿童焦虑抑郁量表——德国8 ~ 17岁儿童的心理测量特征及标准数据。

IF 2.4 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.1002/mpr.1965

Susanne Grothus, Ariane Sommer, Benedikt B. Claus, Lorin Stahlschmidt, Bruce F. Chorpita, Julia Wager

{"title":"德文版修订儿童焦虑抑郁量表——德国8 ~ 17岁儿童的心理测量特征及标准数据。","authors":"Susanne Grothus, Ariane Sommer, Benedikt B. Claus, Lorin Stahlschmidt, Bruce F. Chorpita, Julia Wager","doi":"10.1002/mpr.1965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Anxiety and depression are internalizing mental disorders often commencing in childhood and manifesting in adolescence. The Revised Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) is an internationally widely used standardized diagnostic tool, but the German version has only been validated in a pediatric chronic pain sample; normative data are not available. The aim of this study is to test its reliability (internal consistency) and validity (factorial, convergent, known-groups) in a representative German school sample and to provide norm data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were collected from <i>N</i> = 1562 German schoolchildren (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.2; <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 2.33; range 8–17 years; 52.4% girls).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Cronbach's <i>α</i> ranged from 0.73 to 0.96 for the total and the six subscales (five anxiety and one depression). Confirmatory factor analysis showed the 6-factor model had acceptable to good model fit with CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.05, which was better than 1- and 2-factor models. The (sub)scales correlated moderate to high negatively with health-related quality of life (−0.31 ≤ <i>τ</i> ≤ −0.51; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and positively with functional impairment (0.31 ≤ <i>τ</i> ≤ 0.48; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean scores of anxiety and depression scales were significantly higher in girls and partly in adolescents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings provide support for the good psychometric properties of the German RCADS in a community sample.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mpr.1965","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The German version of the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale—Psychometric properties and normative data for German 8- to 17-year-olds\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Grothus, Ariane Sommer, Benedikt B. Claus, Lorin Stahlschmidt, Bruce F. Chorpita, Julia Wager\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mpr.1965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anxiety and depression are internalizing mental disorders often commencing in childhood and manifesting in adolescence. The Revised Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) is an internationally widely used standardized diagnostic tool, but the German version has only been validated in a pediatric chronic pain sample; normative data are not available. The aim of this study is to test its reliability (internal consistency) and validity (factorial, convergent, known-groups) in a representative German school sample and to provide norm data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data were collected from <i>N</i> = 1562 German schoolchildren (<i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.2; <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 2.33; range 8–17 years; 52.4% girls).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cronbach's <i>α</i> ranged from 0.73 to 0.96 for the total and the six subscales (five anxiety and one depression). Confirmatory factor analysis showed the 6-factor model had acceptable to good model fit with CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.05, which was better than 1- and 2-factor models. The (sub)scales correlated moderate to high negatively with health-related quality of life (−0.31 ≤ <i>τ</i> ≤ −0.51; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and positively with functional impairment (0.31 ≤ <i>τ</i> ≤ 0.48; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Mean scores of anxiety and depression scales were significantly higher in girls and partly in adolescents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings provide support for the good psychometric properties of the German RCADS in a community sample.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mpr.1965\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.1965\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mpr.1965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:焦虑和抑郁是一种内在化的精神障碍，通常始于童年，表现于青春期。修订焦虑和抑郁量表(RCADS)是国际上广泛使用的标准化诊断工具，但德国版本仅在儿科慢性疼痛样本中得到验证;没有标准数据。本研究的目的是在具有代表性的德国学校样本中测试其信度(内部一致性)和效度(析因，收敛，已知组)，并提供规范数据。方法:收集德国学龄儿童N = 1562例(Mage = 12.2;SDage = 2.33;8-17岁;52.4%的女孩)。结果:总量表和6个量表(5个焦虑量表和1个抑郁量表)的Cronbach's α值在0.73 ~ 0.96之间。验证性因子分析表明，6因素模型具有较好的模型拟合，CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.05，优于1因素和2因素模型。(亚)量表与健康相关生活质量呈中高负相关(-0.31≤τ≤-0.51;p结论:研究结果支持德国RCADS在社区样本中具有良好的心理测量特性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The German version of the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale—Psychometric properties and normative data for German 8- to 17-year-olds

Objectives

Anxiety and depression are internalizing mental disorders often commencing in childhood and manifesting in adolescence. The Revised Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) is an internationally widely used standardized diagnostic tool, but the German version has only been validated in a pediatric chronic pain sample; normative data are not available. The aim of this study is to test its reliability (internal consistency) and validity (factorial, convergent, known-groups) in a representative German school sample and to provide norm data.

Methods

Data were collected from N = 1562 German schoolchildren (M_age = 12.2; SD_age = 2.33; range 8–17 years; 52.4% girls).

Results

Cronbach's α ranged from 0.73 to 0.96 for the total and the six subscales (five anxiety and one depression). Confirmatory factor analysis showed the 6-factor model had acceptable to good model fit with CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.93, RMSEA = 0.05, SRMR = 0.05, which was better than 1- and 2-factor models. The (sub)scales correlated moderate to high negatively with health-related quality of life (−0.31 ≤ τ ≤ −0.51; p < 0.001) and positively with functional impairment (0.31 ≤ τ ≤ 0.48; p < 0.001). Mean scores of anxiety and depression scales were significantly higher in girls and partly in adolescents.

Conclusion

Findings provide support for the good psychometric properties of the German RCADS in a community sample.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 医学-精神病学

CiteScore

5.20

自引率

6.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (MPR) publishes high-standard original research of a technical, methodological, experimental and clinical nature, contributing to the theory, methodology, practice and evaluation of mental and behavioural disorders. The journal targets in particular detailed methodological and design papers from major national and international multicentre studies. There is a close working relationship with the US National Institute of Mental Health, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Diagnostic Instruments Committees, as well as several other European and international organisations. MPR aims to publish rapidly articles of highest methodological quality in such areas as epidemiology, biostatistics, generics, psychopharmacology, psychology and the neurosciences. Articles informing about innovative and critical methodological, statistical and clinical issues, including nosology, can be submitted as regular papers and brief reports. Reviews are only occasionally accepted. MPR seeks to monitor, discuss, influence and improve the standards of mental health and behavioral neuroscience research by providing a platform for rapid publication of outstanding contributions. As a quarterly journal MPR is a major source of information and ideas and is an important medium for students, clinicians and researchers in psychiatry, clinical psychology, epidemiology and the allied disciplines in the mental health field.