Rosemary H Jenkins, Eszter P Vamos, David Taylor-Robinson, Kate E Mason, Anthony A Laverty
{"title":"英格兰地方公共部门支出和食品购买的变化:一项纵向生态学研究。","authors":"Rosemary H Jenkins, Eszter P Vamos, David Taylor-Robinson, Kate E Mason, Anthony A Laverty","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Changes in public sector service spending may influence food consumption. We make use of changing local authority (LA) expenditure in England to assess impacts on food purchasing. We examine total LA service spending and explore two potential pathways: highways and transport spending which may affect access to food; and housing service expenditure which may affect household resources available to purchase foods.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal panel survey at the LA level (2008-2015) using fixed effects linear regression.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>324 LAs in England.</p><p><strong>Main exposure: </strong>Expenditure per capita on total LA services, highways and transport services, and housing services.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>LA area estimates of purchasing of fresh fruits and vegetables, high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) foods, and takeaways at home, expressed as a percentage of total food and drink expenditure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total LA service spending decreased by 17% on average between 2008 and 2015. A 10% decrease in total LA spending was associated with a 0.071 percentage point decrease in HFSS (95% CI -0.093 to -0.050) and a 0.015 percentage point increase in takeaways (95% CI 0.006 to 0.024). A 10% decrease in highways and transport expenditure was associated with a 0.006 percentage point decrease in fruit and vegetable purchasing (95% CI -0.009 to -0.002) and a 0.006 percentage point increase in takeaway purchasing (95% CI 0.001 to 0.010). These associations were seen in urban areas only when analyses were stratified by rural/urban area status. A 0.006 percentage point decrease in HFSS purchasing was also seen with a 10% decrease in housing expenditure (95% CI -0.010 to -0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changes in LA spending may have impacts on food purchasing which are evident at the area level. This suggests that in addition to more prominent impacts such as foodbank use, austerity measures may have mixed impacts on food purchasing behaviours among the wider population. Individual-level research is needed to further elucidate these relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes to local area public sector spending and food purchasing in England: a longitudinal ecological study.\",\"authors\":\"Rosemary H Jenkins, Eszter P Vamos, David Taylor-Robinson, Kate E Mason, Anthony A Laverty\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Changes in public sector service spending may influence food consumption. We make use of changing local authority (LA) expenditure in England to assess impacts on food purchasing. We examine total LA service spending and explore two potential pathways: highways and transport spending which may affect access to food; and housing service expenditure which may affect household resources available to purchase foods.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal panel survey at the LA level (2008-2015) using fixed effects linear regression.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>324 LAs in England.</p><p><strong>Main exposure: </strong>Expenditure per capita on total LA services, highways and transport services, and housing services.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>LA area estimates of purchasing of fresh fruits and vegetables, high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) foods, and takeaways at home, expressed as a percentage of total food and drink expenditure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total LA service spending decreased by 17% on average between 2008 and 2015. A 10% decrease in total LA spending was associated with a 0.071 percentage point decrease in HFSS (95% CI -0.093 to -0.050) and a 0.015 percentage point increase in takeaways (95% CI 0.006 to 0.024). A 10% decrease in highways and transport expenditure was associated with a 0.006 percentage point decrease in fruit and vegetable purchasing (95% CI -0.009 to -0.002) and a 0.006 percentage point increase in takeaway purchasing (95% CI 0.001 to 0.010). These associations were seen in urban areas only when analyses were stratified by rural/urban area status. A 0.006 percentage point decrease in HFSS purchasing was also seen with a 10% decrease in housing expenditure (95% CI -0.010 to -0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changes in LA spending may have impacts on food purchasing which are evident at the area level. This suggests that in addition to more prominent impacts such as foodbank use, austerity measures may have mixed impacts on food purchasing behaviours among the wider population. Individual-level research is needed to further elucidate these relationships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9237904/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:公共部门服务支出的变化可能影响食品消费。我们利用英格兰不断变化的地方当局(LA)支出来评估对食品采购的影响。我们研究了洛杉矶的总服务支出,并探索了两种潜在的途径:可能影响食物获取的高速公路和运输支出;以及住房服务支出,这可能会影响家庭可用于购买食物的资源。设计:采用固定效应线性回归在洛杉矶水平进行纵向面板调查(2008-2015)。设置:英国324个LAs。主要暴露:总洛杉矶服务、公路和运输服务以及住房服务的人均支出。主要结果测量:洛杉矶地区购买新鲜水果和蔬菜、高脂肪、高糖和高盐(HFSS)食品和在家外卖的估计,以食品和饮料总支出的百分比表示。结果:2008年至2015年间,洛杉矶服务总支出平均下降了17%。洛杉矶总支出减少10%与HFSS减少0.071个百分点(95% CI -0.093至-0.050)和外卖增加0.015个百分点(95% CI 0.006至0.024)相关。公路和运输支出减少10%,水果和蔬菜购买量减少0.006个百分点(95%可信区间为-0.009至-0.002),外卖购买量增加0.006个百分点(95%可信区间为0.001至0.010)。只有在按农村/城市地区状况分层分析时,才能在城市地区看到这些关联。住房支出减少10%(95%置信区间为-0.010至-0.002),家庭资费支出减少0.006个百分点。结论:洛杉矶消费的变化可能对食品购买产生影响,这在地区层面上是明显的。这表明,除了食物银行的使用等更突出的影响外,紧缩措施可能对更广泛人群的食品购买行为产生混合影响。个人层面的研究需要进一步阐明这些关系。
Changes to local area public sector spending and food purchasing in England: a longitudinal ecological study.
Objectives: Changes in public sector service spending may influence food consumption. We make use of changing local authority (LA) expenditure in England to assess impacts on food purchasing. We examine total LA service spending and explore two potential pathways: highways and transport spending which may affect access to food; and housing service expenditure which may affect household resources available to purchase foods.
Design: Longitudinal panel survey at the LA level (2008-2015) using fixed effects linear regression.
Setting: 324 LAs in England.
Main exposure: Expenditure per capita on total LA services, highways and transport services, and housing services.
Main outcome measures: LA area estimates of purchasing of fresh fruits and vegetables, high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) foods, and takeaways at home, expressed as a percentage of total food and drink expenditure.
Results: Total LA service spending decreased by 17% on average between 2008 and 2015. A 10% decrease in total LA spending was associated with a 0.071 percentage point decrease in HFSS (95% CI -0.093 to -0.050) and a 0.015 percentage point increase in takeaways (95% CI 0.006 to 0.024). A 10% decrease in highways and transport expenditure was associated with a 0.006 percentage point decrease in fruit and vegetable purchasing (95% CI -0.009 to -0.002) and a 0.006 percentage point increase in takeaway purchasing (95% CI 0.001 to 0.010). These associations were seen in urban areas only when analyses were stratified by rural/urban area status. A 0.006 percentage point decrease in HFSS purchasing was also seen with a 10% decrease in housing expenditure (95% CI -0.010 to -0.002).
Conclusion: Changes in LA spending may have impacts on food purchasing which are evident at the area level. This suggests that in addition to more prominent impacts such as foodbank use, austerity measures may have mixed impacts on food purchasing behaviours among the wider population. Individual-level research is needed to further elucidate these relationships.