Eilís Keeble, H. Roberts, Christopher Williams, J. V. van Oppen, S. Conroy
{"title":"体弱老年人住院治疗的结果:一项为期2年的队列研究","authors":"Eilís Keeble, H. Roberts, Christopher Williams, J. V. van Oppen, S. Conroy","doi":"10.3399/bjgp19X704621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background ‘Frailty crises’ are a common cause of hospital admission among older people and there is significant focus on admission avoidance. However, identifying frailty before a crisis occurs is challenging, making it difficult to effectively target community services. Better longer-term outcome data are needed if services are to reflect the needs of the growing population of older people with frailty. Aim To determine long-term outcomes of older people discharged from hospital following short (<72 hours) and longer hospital admissions compared by frailty status. Design and setting Two populations aged ≥70 years discharged from hospital units: those following short ‘ambulatory’ admissions (<72 hours) and those following longer inpatient stays. Method Data for 2-year mortality and hospital use were compared using frailty measures derived from clinical and hospital data. Results Mortality after 2 years was increased for frail compared with non-frail individuals in both cohorts. Patients in the ambulatory cohort classified as frail had increased mortality (Rockwood hazard ratio 2.3 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.5 to 3.4]) and hospital use (Rockwood rate ratio 2.1 [95% CI = 1.7 to 2.6]) compared with those patients classified as non-frail. Conclusion Individuals with frailty who are discharged from hospital experience increased mortality and resource use, even after short ‘ambulatory’ admissions. This is an easily identifiable group that is at increased risk of poor outcomes. Health and social care systems might wish to examine their current care response for frail older people discharged from hospital. There may be value in a ‘secondary prevention’ approach to frailty crises targeting individuals who are discharged from hospital.","PeriodicalId":22333,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of General Practice","volume":"56 1","pages":"e555 - e560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of hospital admissions among frail older people: a 2-year cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Eilís Keeble, H. Roberts, Christopher Williams, J. V. van Oppen, S. Conroy\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/bjgp19X704621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background ‘Frailty crises’ are a common cause of hospital admission among older people and there is significant focus on admission avoidance. However, identifying frailty before a crisis occurs is challenging, making it difficult to effectively target community services. Better longer-term outcome data are needed if services are to reflect the needs of the growing population of older people with frailty. Aim To determine long-term outcomes of older people discharged from hospital following short (<72 hours) and longer hospital admissions compared by frailty status. Design and setting Two populations aged ≥70 years discharged from hospital units: those following short ‘ambulatory’ admissions (<72 hours) and those following longer inpatient stays. Method Data for 2-year mortality and hospital use were compared using frailty measures derived from clinical and hospital data. Results Mortality after 2 years was increased for frail compared with non-frail individuals in both cohorts. Patients in the ambulatory cohort classified as frail had increased mortality (Rockwood hazard ratio 2.3 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.5 to 3.4]) and hospital use (Rockwood rate ratio 2.1 [95% CI = 1.7 to 2.6]) compared with those patients classified as non-frail. Conclusion Individuals with frailty who are discharged from hospital experience increased mortality and resource use, even after short ‘ambulatory’ admissions. This is an easily identifiable group that is at increased risk of poor outcomes. Health and social care systems might wish to examine their current care response for frail older people discharged from hospital. There may be value in a ‘secondary prevention’ approach to frailty crises targeting individuals who are discharged from hospital.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British Journal of General Practice\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"e555 - e560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British Journal of General Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52
摘要
背景:“虚弱危机”是老年人住院的常见原因,人们非常关注避免住院。然而,在危机发生之前确定脆弱性是具有挑战性的,因此难以有效地针对社区服务。如果服务要反映日益增长的体弱多病老年人的需求,就需要更好的长期结果数据。目的比较老年人在短时间(<72小时)和较长时间住院后的长期预后。设计和设定两组年龄≥70岁的出院人群:一组是短期“门诊”住院(<72小时),另一组是长期住院。方法采用来自临床和医院资料的衰弱指标,对2年死亡率和住院率进行比较。结果两组患者2年后体弱者的死亡率均高于非体弱者。与非虚弱的患者相比,被分类为虚弱的患者的死亡率(Rockwood风险比为2.3[95%可信区间{CI} = 1.5至3.4])和住院率(Rockwood风险比为2.1 [95% CI = 1.7至2.6])均有所增加。结论:即使在短暂的“门诊”住院后,出院的虚弱患者死亡率和资源利用率也会增加。这是一个容易识别的群体,其不良后果的风险增加。卫生和社会保健系统可能希望检查他们目前对出院的体弱老年人的护理反应。针对出院人员的虚弱危机采取“二级预防”方法可能有价值。
Outcomes of hospital admissions among frail older people: a 2-year cohort study
Background ‘Frailty crises’ are a common cause of hospital admission among older people and there is significant focus on admission avoidance. However, identifying frailty before a crisis occurs is challenging, making it difficult to effectively target community services. Better longer-term outcome data are needed if services are to reflect the needs of the growing population of older people with frailty. Aim To determine long-term outcomes of older people discharged from hospital following short (<72 hours) and longer hospital admissions compared by frailty status. Design and setting Two populations aged ≥70 years discharged from hospital units: those following short ‘ambulatory’ admissions (<72 hours) and those following longer inpatient stays. Method Data for 2-year mortality and hospital use were compared using frailty measures derived from clinical and hospital data. Results Mortality after 2 years was increased for frail compared with non-frail individuals in both cohorts. Patients in the ambulatory cohort classified as frail had increased mortality (Rockwood hazard ratio 2.3 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.5 to 3.4]) and hospital use (Rockwood rate ratio 2.1 [95% CI = 1.7 to 2.6]) compared with those patients classified as non-frail. Conclusion Individuals with frailty who are discharged from hospital experience increased mortality and resource use, even after short ‘ambulatory’ admissions. This is an easily identifiable group that is at increased risk of poor outcomes. Health and social care systems might wish to examine their current care response for frail older people discharged from hospital. There may be value in a ‘secondary prevention’ approach to frailty crises targeting individuals who are discharged from hospital.