实践环境难题的另一部分:团队美德工具的开发和验证。

Lynn Varagona, Nancy Ballard, Peggy McCartt, Kevin K McEwan, Kimberly Knotts
{"title":"实践环境难题的另一部分:团队美德工具的开发和验证。","authors":"Lynn Varagona,&nbsp;Nancy Ballard,&nbsp;Peggy McCartt,&nbsp;Kevin K McEwan,&nbsp;Kimberly Knotts","doi":"10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, a widely used practice environment instrument, does not measure vital coworker interrelations. Team virtuousness measures coworker interrelations, yet the literature lacks a comprehensive instrument built from a theoretical foundation that captures the structure. This study sought to develop a comprehensive measure of team virtuousness built from Aquinas' Virtue Ethics Theory that captures the underlying structure. Subjects included nursing unit staff and master of business administration (MBA) students. A total of 114 items were generated and administered to MBA students. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were run on randomly split halves. Based on analyses, 33 items were subsequently administered to nursing unit staff. EFA and CFA were repeated on randomly split halves; CFA item loadings replicated EFA. Three components emerged from the MBA student data: integrity, α = .96; group benevolence, α = .70; and excellence, α = .91. Two components emerged from the nursing unit data: wisdom, α = .97; and excellence, α = .94. Team virtuousness varied significantly among units and correlated significantly with engagement. The two component instrument, named the Perceived Trustworthiness Indicator, is a comprehensive measure of team virtuousness built from a theoretical framework that captures the underlying structure, demonstrates adequate reliability and validity, and measures coworker interrelations on nursing units. Forgiveness and relational and inner harmony emerged as elements of team virtuousness, broadening understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":35640,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Administration Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another Piece of the Practice Environment Puzzle: Development and Validation of a Team Virtuousness Instrument.\",\"authors\":\"Lynn Varagona,&nbsp;Nancy Ballard,&nbsp;Peggy McCartt,&nbsp;Kevin K McEwan,&nbsp;Kimberly Knotts\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, a widely used practice environment instrument, does not measure vital coworker interrelations. Team virtuousness measures coworker interrelations, yet the literature lacks a comprehensive instrument built from a theoretical foundation that captures the structure. This study sought to develop a comprehensive measure of team virtuousness built from Aquinas' Virtue Ethics Theory that captures the underlying structure. Subjects included nursing unit staff and master of business administration (MBA) students. A total of 114 items were generated and administered to MBA students. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were run on randomly split halves. Based on analyses, 33 items were subsequently administered to nursing unit staff. EFA and CFA were repeated on randomly split halves; CFA item loadings replicated EFA. Three components emerged from the MBA student data: integrity, α = .96; group benevolence, α = .70; and excellence, α = .91. Two components emerged from the nursing unit data: wisdom, α = .97; and excellence, α = .94. Team virtuousness varied significantly among units and correlated significantly with engagement. The two component instrument, named the Perceived Trustworthiness Indicator, is a comprehensive measure of team virtuousness built from a theoretical framework that captures the underlying structure, demonstrates adequate reliability and validity, and measures coworker interrelations on nursing units. Forgiveness and relational and inner harmony emerged as elements of team virtuousness, broadening understanding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Administration Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Administration Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Administration Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

护理工作指数的实践环境量表是一种广泛使用的实践环境工具,它不测量重要的同事关系。团队美德衡量同事之间的相互关系,然而,文献缺乏一个建立在理论基础上的综合工具来捕捉这种结构。本研究试图从阿奎那的美德伦理理论出发,建立一个全面的团队美德衡量标准,以捕捉其潜在的结构。研究对象包括护理单位员工和工商管理硕士(MBA)学生。总共有114个项目被生成并管理给MBA学生。探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)在随机分割的两半上进行。根据分析,随后对护理单位工作人员进行了33个项目的管理。随机分两半重复EFA和CFA;CFA项目加载复制了EFA。从MBA学生数据中得出三个组成部分:完整性,α = 0.96;组仁,α = 0.70;卓越,α = 0.91。从护理单位数据中出现了两个成分:智慧,α = 0.97;卓越,α = 0.94。团队美德在不同单位之间差异显著,且与敬业度显著相关。这个由两部分组成的工具,被称为感知可信度指标,是一个综合衡量团队美德的方法,它建立在一个理论框架上,该框架捕捉了潜在的结构,证明了足够的可靠性和有效性,并测量了护理单位的同事相互关系。宽恕、关系和内在和谐成为团队美德的要素,扩大了理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Another Piece of the Practice Environment Puzzle: Development and Validation of a Team Virtuousness Instrument.

The Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, a widely used practice environment instrument, does not measure vital coworker interrelations. Team virtuousness measures coworker interrelations, yet the literature lacks a comprehensive instrument built from a theoretical foundation that captures the structure. This study sought to develop a comprehensive measure of team virtuousness built from Aquinas' Virtue Ethics Theory that captures the underlying structure. Subjects included nursing unit staff and master of business administration (MBA) students. A total of 114 items were generated and administered to MBA students. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were run on randomly split halves. Based on analyses, 33 items were subsequently administered to nursing unit staff. EFA and CFA were repeated on randomly split halves; CFA item loadings replicated EFA. Three components emerged from the MBA student data: integrity, α = .96; group benevolence, α = .70; and excellence, α = .91. Two components emerged from the nursing unit data: wisdom, α = .97; and excellence, α = .94. Team virtuousness varied significantly among units and correlated significantly with engagement. The two component instrument, named the Perceived Trustworthiness Indicator, is a comprehensive measure of team virtuousness built from a theoretical framework that captures the underlying structure, demonstrates adequate reliability and validity, and measures coworker interrelations on nursing units. Forgiveness and relational and inner harmony emerged as elements of team virtuousness, broadening understanding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Administration Quarterly
Nursing Administration Quarterly Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Nursing Administration Quarterly (NAQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides nursing administrators with practical, up-to-date information on the effective management of nursing services in all health care settings. Published 4 times per year, each issue focuses on a selected topic providing an in depth look at the many aspects of nursing administration.
期刊最新文献
Advancing the Art and Science of Professional Nursing Practice With the Virtually Integrated CareSM Model. Beyond the Basics: Partnerships and Innovations for Empowerment to Address Workplace Violence, a Call to Action. Centralized Scheduling of Nursing Staff: A Rapid Review of the Literature. Clinician Wellbeing and Mental Health Assessment Across Two Acute Care Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic. COVID-19 Stressors and Resilience Among Nurse Leaders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1